It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

??? rabbis in front of Rav Chisda this one that is not like Rabbi For if it was Rabbi immediately for he said: ??? them in a case If it was ??? them ??? immediately As it is written before Hashem ??? them ??? If it was ??? this one ??? Those who are ill ??? He said to them Rav Chisda In reality lit: In the world like Rabbi ??? them ??? and Those who are ill ipso facto ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: For it was taught: ??? yes. ??? except outside this one certainly Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon She For if it was Rabbi this one ??? them ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi Let us say, ??? of R' Yochanan from this ??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? on ??? Hezekiyah said: His holiness forty from the midst of ??? And R' Yochanan said: No. His holiness forty from the midst of ??? Is this not who it was said: He ascended Rabbi Zeira said Everyone acknowledges in a case for he said: ??? forty from the midst of ??? Here in this case, also, for he said: ??? both from the midst of four It was taught by R' Chaninah ??? in front of R' Yochanan ??? four ??? on two ??? two from them ??? their blood that did not have ??? If it was You say thus in the same way ??? ??? He said to him: R' Yochanan And so says to a person ??? he sinned on account of ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? A sin-offering ??? an elevation-offering R' Eliezer says: ??? is more ??? I meat A sin-offering is more it is as if She pieces of wood But the sages say: ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? why is it that Let us say, ??? he sinned on account of ??? he sinned the case is that of a sin-offering, on account of ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, say ??? he sinned the case is that of a sin-offering, on account of ??? the case is that of an elevation-offering, we do not say ??? the validity Watch out for leading vav And who said it? and this was taught! ??? that did not have ??? or ??? between before ??? between after ??? the blood ??? shall eat and if it was Sabbath No. ??? and if In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? to offer ??? But why? Let us say, ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned on account of ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned on Shabbat so that ??? on Shabbat say ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned on Shabbat so that ??? we do not say ??? words did not say For it was taught in a mishna: ??? of terumah ??? the upper one ??? Those who are ill ??? give thanks Rabbi Eliezer and R' Yehoshua ??? It is possible ??? from it ??? And if not, R' Eliezer says:

דף מח,ב גמרא

??? and do not ??? in the hand of and R' Yehoshua says Even ??? in the hand of It is different there in that case ??? For he came Rav Isaac It was taught by ??? that did not have ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? Rav Nachman said Master, ??? them ??? It was taught by ??? a Tanna taught: of the academy of Levi ??? guilt-obligation ??? It was taught by are proper for it teaches: Levi but the remainder of ??? a Nazir ??? that did not have ??? and not if they put it up on the altar ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of guilt-obligation ??? for a day and a night And there is no meaning to the word ??? No. bread and not ??? They challenged him from this teaching: a guilt-offering son of year" ??? son of two son of two ??? son of year" ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? but: ??? a Nazir ??? she will give birth ??? one suffering from tzara'at that were My son, two two ??? are proper "The general principle of the thing is that all ??? is valid ??? guilt-obligation and all ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, is invalid, ??? except ??? This a Tanna taught: a Tanna taught: of the academy of Levi he Come and hear: for it teaches: Levi a guilt-offering a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? that did not have ??? are proper and not if they put it up on the altar ??? guilt-obligation ??? time ??? or that were My son, two two ??? and if ??? peace-offerings ??? a guilt-offering ??? No. ??? and if ??? peace-offerings ??? also a guilt-offering ??? a guilt-offering a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? thefts and a guilt-offering misappropriations of sanctified items or a guilt-offering thefts and a guilt-offering misappropriations of sanctified items ??? a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at Rav said ??? son of ??? a thing that did not have ??? that did not have ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? a thing that did not have ??? and not and this was taught! from where do we learn to be taken out. ??? He ascended No. He descended for behold! he would exit is valid ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.