It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

??? It is because of this: Rabbi ??? son of ??? And they said ??? Rav Kahana he would say over to it the son of Rabbi Chanina son of ??? like who ??? this one For it was taught in a baraita ??? and were given in the midst of ??? Behold! This is forbidden like who Let us say, Rabbi ??? son of ??? She and not rabbis Even if you say rabbis ??? complete. shall not be ??? from this you shall Thus said Rabbi ??? yes. to you ??? -- more ??? a sinner Rav Isaac son of ??? he said Minchah-offering of a sinner ??? in water and is valid Let us say, In this case, ??? reasoned ??? that are ??? and one master reasons that ??? that were ??? No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? that are ??? In this case, ??? reasoned What then does it mean when it says ??? and one master reasons that ??? from all ??? It was taught there: meat ??? meat ??? that are Rav and R' Chiyya and Rabbi Yochanan They said: ??? that are Shmuel and Rabbi Shimon ??? They said: ??? that are They challenged him from this teaching: meat ??? that did not have he was in it ??? and he stood on ??? tahor on that which was in the past and tamei ??? According to Rabbinic law, If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, and thus ??? and thus ??? If you say, This is satisfactory a law established by the Torah we were That there are an invalidating act nevertheless and notar except If you say, is a law established by the Rabbis an invalidating act nevertheless and notar ??? who that it is possible I would say and thus ??? an invalidating act nevertheless and thus ??? notar For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? an invalidating act nevertheless ??? notar is a law established by the Rabbis She all this ??? No. ??? rabbis Come and hear from this Come and hear: meat ??? that he was in it ??? less than ??? tamei on that which was in the past and tahor ??? Rabbah said all in a case originally it was. of him. and now is not there? this one is not there? and all in a case originally It was not of him. and now it was. of him. According to Rabbinic law,

דף נד,ב גמרא

Because specifically, where they disagree is this: For example, that he was in it ??? and he returned ??? reasoned there are ??? and one master reasons that yes. ??? and who that it is possible ??? For it was taught in a mishna: an egg's volume they eat ??? and thus an olive's volume from the dead an olive's volume from ??? from ??? and an olive's volume an invalidating act nevertheless and an olive's volume notar and an olive's volume milk ??? and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless and notar and milk ??? and they are obligated upon them It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless and notar and milk ??? there are ??? Come and hear: ??? figs on ??? in number If you say, This is satisfactory ??? that are ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? that are it was. for him ??? who gives much ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? that are I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? on ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? that are then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? that are ??? he except Here in this case, from terumah that is large is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and the beginning of the teaching, ??? proper and at the end of the teaching, ??? proper She If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, R' Elazar said ??? Abba he was take ten ??? on ??? and if from terumah that is large ten What then does it mean when it says ??? except Here in this case, ??? tithe is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and Abba ??? son of the one who lovingly grants he as it is taught: Abba ??? son of the one who lovingly grants says (in Numbers 18) ??? to you ??? is what the scripture says. One terumah that is large and one terumah of tithe in the same way ??? that is large ??? thus in the same way terumah of tithe ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.