It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נו,א גמרא

??? male goats of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? He disagreed with this Ravina this accounts to Rabbi Yehudah to Rabbi Shimon What is there to say? He said to him Mar Zutra the son of of Rav ??? to Rabbi Yehudah also What then does it mean when it says ??? What then does it mean when it says that is not ??? No. ??? And if you say If it was No. ??? he read then I might incorrectly say: ??? he read of him ??? except hour ??? No. ??? Here in this case, also, hour ??? No. ??? except that specific required north And there is no meaning to the word ??? in the north from that of Rabbi ??? as it is taught: Rabbi ??? says (Lev. 1) ??? that specific on ??? the altar of the north Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? in the north and he accepts in the north and if he stood ??? in the north is invalid, It is possible Even this thus Scripture states: that specific that specific in the north and not ??? It is necessary for him to be ??? in the north except that specific in the north And there is no meaning to the word son of "uf" in the north You might have thought that I would say that he shall take ??? for just as son of ??? that did not have fixed to him a priest fixed to him north son of "uf" ??? to him a priest is it not logical ??? to him north Just as ??? which provides fixed to him implements of except that specific in the north And there is no meaning to the word Passover in the north Passover ??? son of Ya'akov ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says It is possible ??? the Paschal offering required north It would be a logical inference for just as an elevation-offering that did not have fixed to it time ??? fixed to it north Passover ??? to him time ??? is it not logical ??? to him north Just as ??? which provides ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? on ??? Just as ??? which provides The holiest of holy offerings ??? also which provides The holiest of holy offerings But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? from the beginning that specific in the north And there is no meaning to the word ??? in the north and that he came it is a problem to you ??? For R' ??? Is this not ??? in the north he who has arrived except thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: yes. ??? in the north but: he accepts in the north he accepts ??? No. ??? he is liable on ??? and on ??? and on ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? two One on ??? and one on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? Just as ??? is isolated ??? that it It once happened ??? and we are guilty on its account in its own right There is no difficulty. this one ??? he and he baked he this one ??? and he will give for him and he baked The Rabbis taught first-born ??? blood ??? that specific the blood in a place that do not doing in it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? the blood in a place ??? in it ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. but the sages say ??? Even in a place ??? in it ??? but only that did not have ??? that specific ??? Rabbi Shimon says:

דף נו,ב גמרא

Even ??? on that specific ??? Rabbi Yehudah says even did he die yes. ??? to him the blood Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said Rabbi Yochanan said: Everyone acknowledges ??? after ??? that he was he is liable As it is written (Lev. 2) No. shall you do chametz (Lev. 6) and not ??? chametz ??? after ??? that he was he is liable As it is written (Lev. 22) ??? if on ??? he he is liable on ??? is it not all the more so? except ??? after ??? that he was he is liable No. ??? except ??? R' Meir reasoned all ??? No. it shall be in it And the rabbbis reason that (Lev. 22) ??? it shall be ??? and R' Meir also it is written ??? it shall be ??? This certain individual ??? the master of ??? from the beginning the master of ??? from the beginning ??? in reality he except ??? invalid as regarding ??? after ??? You might have thought that I would say that Because ??? and the blessing of the Service ??? also ??? Come and learn from this. And the rabbbis also it is written (Lev. 22) all ??? No. it shall be in it This certain individual should bring himself to account for that which was taught and all ??? No. it shall be in it yes. for me except that it should not be in it ??? from where do we learn that did not have it be caused by to him by way of lit., through the hands of others that did not have Watch out for leading vav !! and he shall place ??? or of figs atop ??? so that ??? Scripture states: all ??? he said ??? and he said all ??? he said R' Ami ??? sourdough atop על גבי ??? he has walked and he sat to him ??? he is liable upon it ??? Sabbath And it once happened Sabbath For This ??? who ??? For didn't Rabbah say son of son of ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.