It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נז,א גמרא

Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? meat atop ??? in it he is liable No. ??? in it is exempt Rabba said: What then does it mean when it says he is liable also for he says ??? prayed of Sabbath Back to the main body of the text: Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? meat atop ??? in it he is liable No. ??? in it is exempt How so? Shall I say For if it was No. ??? of him. No. ??? This is obvious! except For if it was No. ??? for him also it was. ??? why is it that No. ??? it is not necessary to teach this For if it was No. ??? of him. it was. ??? one ??? son of ??? And so ??? of him. ??? son of ??? So come and learn from this. ??? one ??? son of ??? No. anything he Rabba said: and if ??? in it ??? one in one place he is liable He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi in one place yes. with the passage of the requisite number of years or three ??? No. For it was taught in a mishna: ??? Any thing that was he is liable How so? Shall I say in one place Any thing that was for what Look, except Is this not with the passage of the requisite number of years or three ??? No. In reality lit: In the world in one place ??? and there are that they said Rabba said: even with the passage of the requisite number of years and three ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Even We also ??? Any thing that was he is liable How so? Shall I say in one place Any thing that was for what Look, except Is this not with the passage of the requisite number of years and three ??? No. In reality lit: In the world in one place ??? The rabbis taught: Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said (Lev. 2) who ??? to Hashem No. shall you do chametz I was says yes. for me ??? without shall you do chametz except the accompanying handful of flour only. the afternoon service (Minchah) from where do we learn Scripture states: the afternoon service (Minchah) the remainder of menuchot offerings: from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 2) all the Minchah who ??? to Hashem is valid and not is invalid from here ??? said ??? he is liable and ??? is exempt he is required Rav ??? and was it taken out and he returned ??? What then? immediately ??? to it ??? And so he returns ??? to it No. ??? He ascended It is because of this: ??? after ??? or perhaps, immediately ??? is invalid, he would exit Watch out for leading vav And ??? not of him. And so he returns ??? to it ??? He ascended It is because of this: ??? after ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Rav ??? on its head of An altar of What then? who ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Hey, isn't it the case that ??? or, perhaps, ??? It once happened he is equivalent. ??? and now ??? for him from all the Minchah who ??? why do I have should bring himself to account for that which was taught who ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean Rabbi Akiva says: ??? bread ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation who fruits are these

דף נז,ב גמרא

and who fruits yes. ??? Raysh Lakish said says he was Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? in water and is valid bread ??? the attribute of ??? She ??? for him to R' ??? for he said: the attribute of ??? No. ??? in the name of Rabbi Yochanan thus in the same way She ??? of ??? who ??? bread ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean R' ??? says ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? And he is consistent R' Yochanan with his reasoning for he said: R' Yochanan Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean and one ??? R' Yishmael And they said a thing one ??? Rabbi ??? as it is taught: (Num. 6) ??? Rabbi ??? says the attribute of ??? between ??? between ??? the attribute of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi ??? says the attribute of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? No. ??? all the essence Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: to you for behold! yes. ??? As it is written (Lev. 23) ??? bread ??? two two ??? chametz ??? to Hashem when does the previous statement apply? there are. to Hashem after ??? in what way ??? Rabbi ??? reasoned ??? the attribute of ??? outside and R' ??? reasoned the attribute of ??? weekday he and not It was necessary to provide both opinions he read ??? For It is necessary to teach this he read ??? the attribute of ??? Let us say, also R' ??? and one ??? R' Yishmael And they said a thing one ??? Rabbi ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? with the attribute of ??? He said to him Rav ??? And this is present here. ??? he He said to him For example, three atop ??? If so, for he says for him Rabbi ??? Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: to you for behold! It is not ??? Let us say, for him For example, ??? of weekday thus now This is satisfactory ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? of him. For kneading to it atop ??? we do not have an objection to it. except ??? immediately for he said: the Merciful One does he act? ??? of him. ??? of weekday The rabbis taught: from where do we learn is more ??? A sin-offering ??? a guilt-offering ??? the Holy of Holies ??? two ??? menuchot offerings: that he was without shall you do Scripture states: (Lev. 2) For all sourdough and all honey No. ??? from him a woman to Hashem Any thing that was from him ??? Behold! he ??? and two ??? and bread ??? there are from them ??? For it was taught: they have fulfilled the mitzvah two ??? and bread ??? that do not from them ??? Rav Sheshet said yes. ??? it was said: ??? atop ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is liable R' Elazar he said is exempt R' Yochanan said: he is liable as it is taught: the altar of yes. for me except An altar of ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 2) and do not the altar of No. they went up to ??? and R' Elazar he said is exempt What is the reason מאי טעמא For scripture said: (Lev. 2) sourdough ??? sacrifice ??? he of Rabbi to you ??? but: something other than this No.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.