It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נט,א משנה

there are ??? oil frankincense oil and not Watch out for leading vav frankincense Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not oil No. Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not oil and these ??? oil frankincense Minchah-offering of ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the anointed priest Minchah-offering of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: gentiles Minchah-offering of women Minchah-offering of ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation require oil And there is no meaning to the word require Watch out for leading vav frankincense bread ??? required Watch out for leading vav frankincense And there is no meaning to the word required oil two ??? and Minchah-offering of a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? yes. ??? No. oil and not Watch out for leading vav frankincense

דף נט,א גמרא

Rav Pappa said: all in a case For it was taught in a baraita ten We have learnt in a Mishna: To exclude from that of Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? Come and learn from this. that is not The rabbis taught: (Lev. 2) ??? upon it oil and not on bread ??? oil that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as the meal-offering associated with a libation that is not require Watch out for leading vav frankincense require oil bread ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense is it not logical ??? oil Scripture states: upon it upon it oil and not on bread ??? oil (Lev. 2) ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not on the meal-offering associated with a libation Watch out for leading vav frankincense that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as bread ??? that is not required oil required Watch out for leading vav frankincense the meal-offering associated with a libation that requires oil is it not logical that requires Watch out for leading vav frankincense Therefore, scripture states: upon it upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not on the meal-offering associated with a libation Watch out for leading vav frankincense the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Minchah-offering of ??? She to discharge the mitzvah two ??? that did not have ??? No. oil and not Watch out for leading vav frankincense Mar said: upon it oil and not on bread ??? oil I would say upon it oil and not on Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests oil ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests it was. for him ??? which provides ??? implements of except and an image ??? bread ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? guilt-obligation ??? on the Sabbath ??? Mar said: upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not on the meal-offering associated with a libation Watch out for leading vav frankincense I would say upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and not on Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests it was. for him ??? which provides ??? the meal-offering associated with a libation it was. for him ??? which provides ??? guilt-obligation ??? on the Sabbath ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Minchah-offering of ??? and so go ahead and say to discharge the mitzvah This What then does it mean when it says If you say, This is satisfactory ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, to discharge the mitzvah why do I have hour ??? No. ??? She to discharge the mitzvah two ??? that did not have ??? No. oil and not Watch out for leading vav frankincense and so go ahead and say to discharge the mitzvah Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests it was. for him ??? which provides ??? implements of ???

דף נט,ב גמרא

two ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? guilt-obligation ??? he was eating ??? on the Sabbath permits ??? in the land." at a time i.e., in a case new and Behold! ???

דף נט,ב משנה

he is liable on the oil alone by itself he is liable on Watch out for leading vav frankincense in its own right he gave upon it oil ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? he gave oil on ??? he does not transgresses without shall you do he gave implements of atop implements of No. ???

דף נט,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Lev. 5) No. ??? about them oil and if in that place ??? It is possible They do not give it upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and if he gave ??? Therefore, scripture states: For A sin-offering It is possible Even with oil Therefore, scripture states: She for just as you see ??? with oil ??? invalidates it I with oil where it is not possible ??? considers it proper I ??? where it is possble ??? Rabbah the son of Rav Huna asked ??? Yochanan he gave upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? What then? It is because of this: where it is possible ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? or perhaps, It is because of this: that is not ??? and Here, too, No. ??? Come and hear: frankincense ??? Perhaps one And furthermore, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one that is not ??? And furthermore, ??? Come and hear: considers it proper I ??? where it is possble ??? Here in this case, also, one And furthermore, ??? he said What then do we do about it? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said It was taught: Minchah-offering of a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? Watch out for leading vav the frankincense and is valid and if before it was even the case that ??? upon it between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, and if ??? upon it with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. ??? and reversed But why? ??? he Abayye said: A sin-offering ??? the Merciful One Rava said: So, with whom does it agree? ??? he the one who does not have ??? as it is taught: ??? says even blood ??? sends his fellow that did not have ??? to him Rav Ashi said: all ??? shall not be ??? Rav said ??? of Rav ??? for him is what he has ??? it is Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita And furthermore, R' Yehudah said: ??? the blood ??? did he die ??? the blood And even in a case ??? It was taught: R' Yehuda says: a cup he was ??? One opposite the foundation Rav said Isaac son of Joseph Rabbi Yochanan said: he gave a smidge lit: a whatever oil atop an olive's volume the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? What is the reason? No. ??? all ??? upon it until That there are ??? And Rav says Isaac son of Joseph Rabbi Yochanan said: he gave an olive's volume Watch out for leading vav frankincense atop a smidge lit: a whatever the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? What is the reason? They do not give it it is written until That there are ??? upon it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.