It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

Just as ??? objection Rav ??? the son of of Rav This he said It is because of this: That there are to say ??? judgement ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. the trapping of Just as ??? which provides ??? milk ??? Just as ??? which provides shall come from this general principle it would follow permission ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? and are permitted ??? Even I ??? even though ??? shall be it is permitted. ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? objection except Rav Ashi said It is because of this: That there are to say from the beginning that judgement ??? to it ??? Just as ??? which provides One who acts in it ??? He said to him: Rav Acha elder to Rav Ashi he would exit the wall He corrects that did not have One who acts in it ??? and it is permitted ??? is forbidden ??? Just as to be taken out. the wall which provides he does not ??? the master of ??? He corrects Just as ??? which provides One who acts in it ??? he would exit the wall He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? and are forbidden ??? and how much more so ??? shall be forbidden ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides No. ??? shall you say ??? Rav Acha the son of Rabba said to Rav Ashi ??? Who is it Shall I say ??? the master of ??? also ??? they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? And there is no meaning to the word they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? except ??? to the priests priests ??? that is high ??? So rather, ??? thus Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? shall you say ??? which provides yes. ??? and because of this It is necessary to teach this he read ??? from here ??? from there ??? (Ezek. 45) ??? Israel from ??? to Israel (Lev. 27) from all who under passes over ??? creates an exclusion ??? that is not ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was ??? Israel ??? in a case that is not it was to it ??? is equivalent ??? the vineyard but: it was to it ??? I would say ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: all who and if passes over Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: all who then I might incorrectly say: passes over ??? in a case ??? and in the end ??? is equivalent ??? but: ??? and in the end ??? it was. ??? I would say ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: from the morning It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other.

דף ו,א משנה

one Minchah-offering of a sinner and one all The menuchot offerings: ??? A tevul yom ??? garments ??? that did not have He washed his hands and his feet ??? tamei who dwells ??? atop vessels atop livestock atop על גבי ??? his fellow is invalid, ??? is invalid, en Beteira says he returns and he shall return ??? He ascended in his hand ??? or ??? salt or drops of Watch out for leading vav frankincense is invalid, because of where they said The fistful of a meal-offering permission ??? is invalid, and Who is permission ??? and lacking ???

דף ו,א גמרא

why do I have ??? one Minchah-offering of a sinner and one all The menuchot offerings: Let the Tanna teach: all The menuchot offerings: ??? It is necessary to teach this as it is taught: Thus said Rabbi Shimon In justice, he that it should be Minchah-offering of a sinner require oil frankincense that it should not be a sinner ??? And on account of what It is not require that it should not be its sacrifice ??? In justice, he that it should be A sin-offering milk require ???

דף ו,ב גמרא

that it should not be a sinner ??? And on account of what It is not require that it should not be its sacrifice ??? For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and he said Rabbi Shimon that it should not be its sacrifice ??? For ants??? to it ??? also ??? Come and learn from this. If so, there i.e., in another mishna also Let the Tanna teach: one A sin-offering milk and one all ??? their blood ??? and let us say, ??? It was necessary to provide both opinions Perhaps, immediately ??? for him all and not The tanna teaches: except all of them ??? So, here, immediately ??? all and not The tanna teaches: except all of them ??? It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? that is not like Rabbi Shimon at the end of the teaching, also that is not like Rabbi Shimon Come and learn from this. Rav said ??? he returns Hey, isn't it the case that We ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: What then does it mean when it says ??? until ??? If so, we were en Beteira If it was ??? does not disagree rabbis upon it ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? the accompanying handful of flour rabbis reason that No. ??? from the midst of his house ??? en Beteira reasoned ??? from the midst of his house ??? If so, en Beteira says he returns and he shall return ??? en Beteira says he returns ??? from the midst of his house ??? and he shall return ??? should bring himself For ??? Rav said ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? Up to this point, No. ??? en Beteira except ??? but: in the remainder of ??? No. Come and learn from this. what is the difference here, ??? to it ??? by day ??? also ??? to it ??? Is this not the blessing of the Service She and not ??? Zeira Rav said ??? a cow ??? is invalid And Rav says He ascended ??? it is written of it that I a cow ??? the house She Is this not all ??? he my sanctity ??? the house They asked the priesthood my sanctity An altar of No. They asked the priesthood Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This something ??? leprous plague ??? the blessing of the Service ??? he is required the priesthood and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? And if you would say ??? No. ??? For it was taught: from where do we learn to be taken out. ??? He ascended No. He descended for behold! he would exit is valid ??? a Tanna taught: (Lev. 6) ??? The elevation-offering right next lit: and leaning for him except The reason is ??? Rav this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: in the remainder of ??? en Beteira For it was taught: Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah and Rabbi Eliezer ??? say considers it proper he was en Beteira in all ??? all of them and it was taught: ??? From here ??? en Beteira says from where do we learn ??? and he shall return ??? Scripture states: ??? From here ??? Already And because of the fact ??? it is written of it What do I have to learn from ??? and What do I have to learn from the remainder of ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Come and hear from this. Rav ??? and even ??? and To exclude from those ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Yosei son of ??? son of ??? And Rabbi Yehudah ??? And they said In what matters are we saying this? ??? and not ??? but: ??? and there are that they said ??? yes. ??? No. like who ??? and To exclude ??? that came first He disagreed with this Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? reason that Behold! ??? If it was ??? the blessing of the Service She even though that is not does he act? for him the giving of implements of If it was ??? Is this not the blessing of the Service She For a slave to it the giving of implements of What then does it mean when it says it was. he returns he said ??? In reality lit: In the world the blessing of the Service She and not ??? until that He performs to it the giving of implements of If so, even No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.