It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סד,א גמרא

I would say to you ??? he reasons for himself. So, too, Up to this point, No. ??? Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? there i.e., in another mishna except ??? for him ??? that is high And it is not necessary ??? Sabbath But here, in this case, that is not ??? for him ??? that is high and it is necessary ??? Sabbath I would say ??? he reasons for himself. except Rabbah said R' Yishmael And Rabbi ??? viceroy the priests. And they said a thing one For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi ??? viceroy the priests. says on Shabbat ??? privately ??? one ??? One ??? in a case where there are three ??? but the sages say one Sabbath and one weekday ??? who No. ??? viceroy the priests. there i.e., in another mishna immediately where it is possible No. ??? Here in this case, also, immediately where it is possible No. ??? From where can you derive Perhaps Up to this point, No. ??? Yishmael Here in this case, except ??? the proclamation of the validity but: there i.e., in another mishna That there are the proclamation of the validity I would say ??? he reasons for himself. So, too, Up to this point, No. ??? viceroy the priests. there i.e., in another mishna For if it was it is dealing with a case where there is only one. If it was in a case where there are three ??? that is high ??? But here, in this case, that is not ??? that is high I would say ??? he reasons for himself. except Rav Ashi said Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Yosei, And they said a thing one For it was taught in a baraita between ??? or whether that did not have ??? upon it the Sabbath Rabbi Yosei says: if ??? yes. ??? upon it the Sabbath who No. R' Yosi said there i.e., in another mishna immediately where it is possible No. ??? Here in this case, also, immediately where it is possible No. ??? From where can you derive Perhaps Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yishmael Here in this case, except ??? you ??? in the future in going but: there i.e., in another mishna ??? you ??? in the future in going I would say ??? he reasons for himself. So, too, Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yosei there i.e., in another mishna except ??? that is high and not ??? Sabbath ??? But here, in this case, That there are ??? that is high ??? Sabbath ??? I would say ??? he reasons, it was said: ??? two sin-offerings of ??? and it is not necessary for him except One Rabbah said (and there are those who say Rabbi Ami he is liable on ??? but exempt him on ??? and even ??? to him in the second and even ??? the first ??? And who said it? Rabbah thus for this statement that Rabbah said poses a contradiction: they were before him two sin-offerings One ??? and one ??? and after this ??? he is liable ??? and after this ??? is exempt and not only this, but for they would say to him that comes ??? initially ??? If you wish, I would say ??? And if you wish, I would say this particular Rabbi Ami he said He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi the first one is found ??? he expects What then? according to ??? do we go? and a person ??? or, perhaps, according to ??? do we go? He said to him Is this not we were of Rabbah and Raba ??? "Hear!" ??? the infant in the sea ??? fish and raised up fish he is liable ??? fish and raised up fish and the infant Rava said: he is liable and Ravah said is exempt and Up to this point, Rabbah No. ??? he exempted except immediately ??? also ??? but not "Hear!" No. and there are that they said He said to him we were ??? of Rabbah and Raba ??? "Hear!" ??? the infant in the sea ??? fish and raised up fish he is liable ??? fish and raised up the infant and fish Rava said: is exempt And Rabba said he is liable Rava said: is exempt ??? according to ??? And Rabba said he is liable ??? according to ??? Rabbah said an ill person ??? One ??? ten people and they brought ten ??? "At the same time," are exempt even "In the case of this one after that one," even Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? in the first, he is required Raba an ill person ??? to have two ??? and there are two ??? and three ??? One Which ??? two ??? for him or, perhaps, three ??? that he came ??? This is obvious! three ???

דף סד,ב גמרא

that until here, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yishmael there i.e., in another mishna except and so when ??? in cases regarding eating ??? But here, in this case, and so when ??? in cases regarding eating ??? certainly three ???

דף סד,ב משנה

the commandments ??? from ??? No. ??? to Jerusalem bring in that specific from all a place It once happened ??? came and two ??? well ???

דף סד,ב גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא If you wish, I would say It is because of this: ??? And if you wish, I would say It is because of this: ??? on ??? It once happened ??? came The Rabbis taught ??? the kings of the house of ??? this on this and it was the case that ??? Every day and day, they were ??? to them ??? elevate to them the Tamid-offerings he was in that place an elderly person one that he was ??? to them ??? He said to them: The whole time ??? yes. ??? tomorrow ??? to them ??? to them ??? immediately arrived ??? wall ??? the Land of Israel four hundred a parsa on four hundred a parsa At that very hour And they said ??? his son ??? and on it hour We learned: It once happened ??? came and two ??? well ??? For it arrived ??? Watch out for leading vav But they did not know ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? he came This certain individual ??? one ??? and one his hand ??? He said to them ??? who that it is possible cases ??? or ??? Examine ??? For he is required ??? two ??? Watch out for leading vav But they did not know ??? to include ??? he came There was this guy ??? his hand ??? and one ??? He said to them ??? and who that it is possible cases ??? well ??? or ??? well Examine ??? three women ??? three ??? one he said ??? and one he said ??? and one he said ??? They deduced from this ??? actually and really ??? actually and really ??? one A sin-offering and one an elevation-offering He said to them ??? lest ??? lest in the sea ??? lest ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.