It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סח,א גמרא

from the midst of that did not have ??? to him except by way of lit., through the hands of ??? he Abaye said to him: this accounts ??? What is there to say? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? atop ??? the house of the sodden ones ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? the house of the sodden ones ??? but not ??? What is there to say? except Abayye said: new ??? of him chametz No. ??? of him Rabba said: with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? it is a problem is a law established by the Rabbis ??? There is no difficulty. except Rabba said: with R' Yehudah Because R' Yehudah said ??? There is no difficulty. ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? There is no difficulty. should it itself ??? upon it ??? of him Rav Ashi said: of Rabbi Yehudah ??? Yehudah There is no difficulty. ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: Hey, isn't it the case that of Rav ??? She this accounts ??? until ??? What is there to say? And if you say Here in this case, also, by way of lit., through the hands of ??? the house of the sodden ones ??? What is there to say? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching of Rav ??? She

דף סח,א משנה

??? new immediately ??? are permitted ??? the day and elsewhere in the scripture ??? he decreed R' Yochanan son of ??? that it should be day ??? all of it is forbidden R' Yehudah said Is it not the case that from the Torah he is forbidden as it is said (Lev. 23) until ??? the day ??? On account of what ??? are permitted ??? the day and elsewhere in the scripture because of that are ??? that do not a court בית דין ??? therein.

דף סח,א גמרא

Rav And for Shmuel who both say at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? permits at a time i.e., in a case that do not the house of ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? East permits What is the reason? two ??? are written it is written (Lev. 23) until ??? and then it is written until ??? the day ??? How so? here, at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived here, at a time i.e., in a case that do not the house of ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived R' Yochanan ??? who both say even at a time i.e., in a case ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? East permits For it is written until ??? new immediately ??? he was permits in the countryside and two ??? in the Holy Temple ???

דף סח,ב גמרא

from when the Holy House the Temple was destroyed he decreed Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai that it should be day ??? all of it is forbidden What is the reason? rapidly" ??? the house of ??? and they shall say ??? who No. ??? East now also ??? and not ??? It was not ??? East permits and now That there are ??? permits and if You might have thought ??? It is because of this: a commandment he shall arise ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai following the position of Rabbi Yehudah he said for he said: from the Torah is forbidden as it is said (Lev. 23) until ??? the day ??? until ??? of day but his thought is until and until are in the general category and who derive it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? upon it For it was taught in a baraita from when the Holy House the Temple was destroyed he decreed Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai that it should be day ??? all of it is forbidden R' Yehudah said: Is it not the case that from the Torah he is forbidden As it is written until ??? the day ??? Rabbi Yehudah he that he came ??? he reasoned Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai According to Rabbinic law, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and not She according to Torah law, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Hey, isn't it the case that he decreed The tanna teaches: What then does it mean when it says he decreed ??? and he decreed Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? new ??? going into ??? They reason new "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel is a law established by the Rabbis ??? No. there is a fear of them. And the rabbbis of the academy of Rav Ashi he ate ??? They reason new "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel a law established by the Torah and Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai According to Rabbinic law, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: And so ??? No. ??? Ravina said he said for me if your father: It was not ??? new except ??? going into ??? to it like R' Yehudah ???

דף סח,ב משנה

??? he was permits in the countryside and two ??? in the Holy Temple yes. bring in menuchot offerings: ??? and Minchah-offering of livestock before ??? if it has been brought, is invalid, before to have two ??? No. ??? if it has been brought, is value

דף סח,ב גמרא

??? Rabbi ??? has a problem Just as between before ??? two ??? he said before him Yehudah son of ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? before ??? which provides No. ??? next to ??? shall you say before to have two ??? next to ??? Rabbi ??? his face of Rabbi Yehudah son of ??? He said to him: Rabbi Akiva Yehudah ??? Your face ??? an elderly person ??? if ??? days Rabbi Yehuda said ??? that specific the section ??? the Paschal offering he was ??? after him: Yehudah son of ??? he and They said to me: he has become exempt he has walked to him Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said according to the words of Yehudah son of ??? before ??? kosher This is obvious! What would you have said? there i.e., in another mishna he ??? next to ??? But here, in this case, that is not ??? No. Come and learn from this. all the more so Here in this case, that is not ??? A general principle: ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama two ??? What then? ??? that did not have ??? How so? For example, ??? between ??? to have two ??? upon them two ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that did not have ??? No. ??? or, perhaps, that did not have ??? also ??? Rabbah said Come and hear: (Lev. 2) and if ??? Minchah-offering of ??? is what the scripture says. ??? she entered from ??? You say from ??? Or perhaps, except from ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: it is said ??? on the Egyptians and it is said ??? Just as ??? is said on the Egyptians ??? Even ??? is said ??? and Rabbi Akiva says: ??? an individual ??? from ??? from ??? from ??? bring in ??? from ??? and if You say came from ??? No. ??? from ??? Another thing: if You say ??? came from ??? yes. two ??? and if ??? that did not have ??? It concerns itself ??? before to have two ??? according to ??? and two ??? before ??? according to two ??? Who deduces

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.