It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ז,א גמרא

And so he turned for him ??? R' Yochanan said: This one says implements of ??? yes. ??? except ??? this one ??? and He brought this very question ??? Yochanan implements of ??? What then? ??? He said to him: yes. ??? He said to him: yes. ??? but: ??? Subject to disqualification, Rav ??? he said For example, ??? in what way does ??? except For example, ??? And because of the fact ??? for him a slave for him ??? For he turned ??? he turned for him ??? he turned for him he would place for him ??? for him and it fell ipso facto ??? He said to him Rabbi ??? to R' Zeira ??? For example, ??? atop ??? except Learn from this ??? for upon regarding ??? to us of Rabbi ??? It was taught by menuchot offerings: among Rav Chisda ??? among Rav Chisda It was taught by For didn't Rav Chisda say ??? He ascended for it is the case that ??? came to proclaim ??? day two ??? ??? for him and he came in front of Rav Chisda to mention ??? for him and he shall take ??? reasoned thus ??? the validity ??? of him. Rav ??? He said to him: How so? ??? He said to him ??? this He said to him: And so ??? for upon regarding ??? He said to him ??? for him a priest How so? ??? The menuchot offerings: He said to him: ??? this And so ??? in a vessel for upon regarding ??? He said to him ??? for him a priest He said to him: If so, ??? three priests He said to him: and shall be it requires the 13th ??? This is the general rule: all The fistful of a meal-offering he gives in a vessel ??? to eat a thing ??? to eat and etc. And even ??? No. The tanna teaches: a Tanna taught: order of ??? and took and not order of priests They asked of him ??? What then? ??? for upon regarding ??? He said to him: ??? Look, Just as ??? four priests enters two in their hands. two ??? and two in their hands. two ??? and four ??? before them two to be picked up two ??? and two to be picked up two ???

דף ז,ב גמרא

And even ??? ??? No. The tanna teaches: Is this not is what you say? Do you really mean that? there i.e., in another mishna order of ??? So, here, order of ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna No. Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down ??? Here in this case, Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down ??? if ??? Let the Tanna teach: ??? except Learn from this ??? for upon regarding ??? Learn from this Rabba said: This is obvious! for me the accompanying handful of flour ??? for upon regarding ??? which provides ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) in a vessel for upon regarding ??? which provides ??? he is required Raba kiddush the accompanying handful of flour What then does it mean when it says ??? to it or ??? to it he returns ??? to it And who said it? Raba thus Hey, isn't it the case that was it said; the accompanying handful of flour ??? with two vessels Rav ??? he said he does not ??? And Rabba said ??? and if ??? he returns of him. Raba ??? From where do we derive this? that is not ??? For Rav learned: ??? son of the grave ??? less than ??? in a vessel this less than ??? in a vessel this No. ??? They posed this difficulty: with blood What then does it mean when it says Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion She ??? No. ??? or, perhaps, there i.e., in another mishna What is the reason? As it is written (Num. 19) and immersed in water Here in this case, also, it is written (Lev. 4) and immersed with blood and it was said: Thus said Rabbi Zerika Rabbi Eliezer said Even with blood No. ??? Rabba said: Another teaching is like this: ??? a priest ??? and immersed and not ??? with blood that it should be with blood the measure immersion ??? from the blood from the blood ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? and immersed and It is necessary to teach this ??? with blood For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: and immersed then I might incorrectly say: even though that is not ??? the measure ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: with blood and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: with blood then I might incorrectly say: even ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: and immersed from the blood ??? What then does it mean when it says Rabba said: ??? That would be a support to him. To whose position? ??? for he said: ??? He said to him ??? son of Rav ??? to Raba They said: ??? Rav said ??? It was taught: he was from this ??? if before it was even the case that ??? required ??? yes. required ??? Is this not before it was even the case that ??? Learn from this ??? are proper No. before it was even the case that Came forth ??? required ??? yes. required ??? Abaye ??? he wipes ??? of a cow ??? yes. No. ??? No. He said to him ??? he wipes ??? No. ??? he wipes its spur lit., its finger This is satisfactory ??? he wipes ??? of a cow As it is written (Num. 19) ??? ??? except No. ??? he wipes its spur lit., its finger in what way he wipes ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? of a cow It was necessary for him ??? he wipes ??? and its spur lit., its finger ??? of a cow ??? The tanna teaches: thus Learn from this that is not he is required ??? Abayye said: ??? as it is written (Ezra 1) ??? gold etc. And who said it? Rabbi Eliezer thus Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? the high priest Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is not "Kedushah" ??? Rabbi Eliezer he said from the midst of ??? "Kedushah" ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.