It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

Rav said Isaac son of ??? it is written I would say ten ??? Rabba said: ??? a thing the scripture we have learned ten ??? ten ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 7) on ??? bread chametz opposite chametz that comes ??? And so a thing ??? he returns This teaches ??? from him and Another thing: he and all from him and Another thing: shall not be ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: shall not be ??? except ??? you shall ??? What is there to say? ??? She

דף עח,א משנה

??? they were have come ??? euphemisms for nazarite vows it was she entered two ??? of a thangkgiving-offering ??? there is not there ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found ten ??? that are Six ???

דף עח,א גמרא

From where in Tanach do we know this? Rav Chisdah said Rav said Chama son of ??? For scripture said: (Lev. 8) ??? the commandments. who before Hashem ??? One ??? bread oil One ??? one This is satisfactory ??? oil What then does it mean when it says ??? Is this not ??? He disagreed with this Rav Aviya I would say ??? except ??? Rav ??? son of Rav Chisda in the name of Rabbi ??? (Lev. 6) this sacrifice "... Aharon and his sons who ??? to Hashem by day ??? that specific And so Just as we have learned to his children by day ??? except There is an analogy between ??? Just as ??? Even ??? Rav Chisdah said the high priest ??? It is necessary for him two ??? One ??? and one ??? Master, son of Rav Ashi said: three and does not disagree this one ??? the blessing of the Service ??? a priest ??? this one that is not a slave the blessing of the Service ??? a priest ??? euphemisms for nazarite vows it was she entered two ??? The rabbis taught: (Lev. 7) ??? a Nazir ??? oil It is possible for all Just as ??? Scripture states: the commandments What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Pappa said: a thing as it is said in it the commandments To exclude ??? that is not it is said in it the commandments of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: the commandments A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? yes. something other than this No.

דף עח,ב משנה

??? The thangkgiving-offering within and to the sun except ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it before it was even the case that ??? and even ??? all of them except ??? from them No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice

דף עח,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says except ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: except ??? the house of ??? he said except ??? he said except ??? in the case of on ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: except ??? the house of ??? but: except ??? and not in the case of on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of it one ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? the Paschal offering on the chametz transgresses without shall you do Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? and Raysh Lakish said In reality lit: In the world he is not liable until that it should be or ??? or ??? or to one ??? with it in the courtyard And Rabbi Yochanan said: Even ??? that do not with it in the courtyard Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? in a case ??? he arises but: in the matter of make kiddush. bread I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him ??? For if it was ??? inside ??? No. ??? And if it was said In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? but: ??? I would say give thanks for him to Rabbi Yochanan Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan ??? The thangkgiving-offering within and to the sun except ??? the house of ??? No. and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it before it was even the case that ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Lev. 6) on ??? bread chametz ??? its sacrifice on zevach-offering This teaches that do not ??? But rather, if so, ??? its sacrifice on zevach-offering This teaches that do not ??? except ??? zevach-offering ??? This teaches ??? that did not have ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice The rabbis taught: ??? please, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? please, Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said all ??? And there is no meaning to the word threads ??? Rabba said: and thus in the matter of ??? a thangkgiving-offering This is obvious! Here in this case, bread it is written and here in this other case, bread it is written What would you have said? one the Merciful One in the Torah says that did not have wash ??? Hey, isn't it the case that like who ??? is comparable Come and hear from this. it was said: a thangkgiving-offering ??? on ??? Hezekiyah said: His holiness forty from the midst of ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: No. His holiness forty from the midst of ??? Rabbi Zeira said Everyone acknowledges in a case for he said: ??? forty from the midst of ??? His holiness to ??? forty But rather, if so, ??? No. His holiness Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? one master reasons that each of them as backups for the other ??? and one master reasons that ??? The greatness ??? Abaye said everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? and in a vessel of service ??? that did not have ??? one master reasons that implements of ??? that did not have ??? and one master reasons that implements of ??? yes. ??? that did not have ??? Rav Papa said, everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world implements of ??? that did not have ??? and here in this other case, ??? one master reasons that ??? reasoned ??? immediately the one who does not have ??? It is not ??? and there are that they said Rav Papa said, everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world implements of ??? yes. ??? except ??? and here in this other case, ??? one master reasons that ??? the one who does not have ??? and one master reasons that ??? No. ??? for him ???

דף עח,ב משנה

it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it outside its designated time or outside its designated place nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it and then found with a disqualifying blemish, R' Eliezer says: ??? But the sages say: No. ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it that did not have ??? and thus a ram ??? and thus two ??? that did not have ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice

דף עח,ב גמרא

??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi Meir as it is taught: This is the general rule: all ??? before ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice ??? after ??? nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it outside its designated time or outside its designated place nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? No. nevertheless, the slaughtering of the offering is sufficient to render holy the bread associated with the sacrifice

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.