It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עט,א גמרא

it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it and then found with a disqualifying blemish, Rabbi Eliezer says: and that which was sanctified for Temple use Rabbi Yehoshua says: No. and that which was sanctified for Temple use These are the words of R' Meir Rabbi Yehuda said No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer and R' Yehoshua on ??? that did not have and that which was sanctified for Temple use and on with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? and on the master of ??? that did not have and that which was sanctified for Temple use and on Just as ??? on with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? Eliezer says and that which was sanctified for Temple use and Rabbi Yehoshua says: No. and that which was sanctified for Temple use Thus said Rabbi Eliezer Because and with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time is invalid, and with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, Just as with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time and that which was sanctified for Temple use Even with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place and that which was sanctified for Temple use R' Yehoshua said: Because and with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, and the master of ??? is invalid, Just as the master of ??? No. and that which was sanctified for Temple use Even with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place No. and that which was sanctified for Temple use He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer I ??? outwards ??? And you, ??? to whoever ??? if ??? outwards ??? if ??? he begins, Rabbi Eliezer ??? is invalid, ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? is invalid, ??? he begins, Rabbi Yehoshua ??? is invalid, in which is not he is spiritually cut off ??? in which is not he is spiritually cut off and do not He corrects with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? in which there is in it he is spiritually cut off And furthermore, ??? And there is not the penalty of excision, ??? Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Meir what is the difference here, it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? that there is ??? before ??? and what is the difference here, it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it and then found with a disqualifying blemish, that is not you shall ??? before ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' ??? for he said: If they ascended, they did not descend and Rabbi Yehoshua For he said Rabbi Akiva If they ascended, they did not descend ??? but: ??? bread No. it was said: A sin-offering ??? except ??? if is credited lit, rises No. ??? except ??? Rava said: ??? Rava said: No. ??? Raba like Rabbi Joshua and Rabbah like Rabbi Eliezer and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had of him. Rabbah ??? of Raba ??? of him. Rabbi Eliezer ??? of Rabbi Joshua and there are that they said Even though it will be ??? of him. R' Eliezer ??? of Rabbi Joshua Rabbah ??? of Raba No. he returns of him. there i.e., in another mishna he for he says for him ??? But here, in this case, If it was ??? for him ??? if is credited lit, rises No. ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it that did not have ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? a Tanna taught: ??? a ram a Nazir ??? and and took a ram ??? and it was taught ??? the essence the validity ???

דף עט,א משנה

??? in a vessel and it is found zevach-offering is invalid, if there are zevach-offering after ??? with it And if not, ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight,

דף עט,א גמרא

he said ??? yes. ??? except ??? What is the reason? Scripture states: (Lev. 23) zevach-offering ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? in a vessel and it is found zevach-offering is invalid, if there are zevach-offering after ??? with it And if not, ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, Is this not ??? No. ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified like who like Rabbi for he said: two items ??? elevate this without this even you say R' Elazar ??? Shimon Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? their blood ???

דף עט,ב גמרא

and R' Elazar ??? Shimon derive it ??? for he said: all ??? to throw ??? he is equivalent. Mar said: if there are zevach-offering after ??? with it for this statement that Rav Chisda said poses a contradiction: oil ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) this is invalid, ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? he said Rabbi ??? heart a court gifts upon them if ??? And if not, ??? after If so, oil also oil ??? he ??? about them ??? lest they shall say ??? now also ??? lest they shall say ??? zevach-offering this are proper ??? zevach-offering after ??? son of Yehudah For example, that he was zevach-offering ??? At that very hour but: yes. zevach-offering ??? At that very hour What then does it mean when it says ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, ??? at the end of the teaching, or not. ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, ??? ??? ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? zevach-offering ??? At that very hour but: yes. zevach-offering ??? At that very hour No. Here, too, ??? he said Regarding what matters are we speaking? that he was zevach-offering ??? At that very hour but: yes. zevach-offering ??? At that very hour was it made? ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, ??? and who it has to Rabbi Shimon ??? heart a court gifts about them for this statement that Rav Idi bar Avin said poses a contradiction: Rav said ??? Rabbi Yitzchak said Rabbi Yochanan said: the Tamid-offerings that did not have ??? according to the words of Rabbi Shimon yes. ??? according to the words of the sages ??? It is different there in that case for there is them ???

דף עט,ב משנה

??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? a thangkgiving-offering and it was lost misplaced so he set aside another one as its replacement, It is not require bread as it is said (Lev. 7) and he sacrificed on zevach-offering The thangkgiving-offering The thangkgiving-offering require bread and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? bread

דף עט,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: What does he say? a thangkgiving-offering ??? on a thangkgiving-offering ??? from where do we learn ??? and it was lost misplaced so he set aside another one as its replacement, and the first one is found and behold, the both of them stand designated. from where do we learn ??? from them ??? and to the sun ??? Therefore, scripture states: The thangkgiving-offering ??? It is possible that it should be the second require bread Therefore, scripture states: ??? one and not two after ??? the scripture ??? from where do we learn ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 7) if on a thangkgiving-offering It is possible ??? bread Scripture states: and he sacrificed on zevach-offering The thangkgiving-offering a thangkgiving-offering require bread and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? bread ??? Rav ??? in the name of Rabbi Yochanan They did not teach such a ruling except after atonement but: before atonement ??? you shall of it Rav ??? Shall I say ??? guilt-obligation If it was before atonement ??? If it was after atonement ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.