It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ח,א גמרא

and if ??? And if you say Rabbi Eliezer the validity ??? No. ??? for this statement that R' Elazar said poses a contradiction: the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? is valid which provides ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? he learns it the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? No. he learns it the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? who he learns it For it was taught: before it was even the case that ??? to the sun ??? is invalid, And there is no meaning to the word ??? upon it ??? to the sun ??? is invalid, ??? upon it ??? and R' Eliezer said No. ??? actually and really except immediately arrived ??? to section despite the fact that did not have ??? is comparable But why? ??? before ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction the afternoon service (Minchah) No. ??? the accompanying handful of flour that are his Hey, isn't it the case that ??? the accompanying handful of flour ??? And because of the fact arrived ??? to section like who ??? is comparable Except I can object with text from here: ??? are kosher ??? between ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them Is this not ??? Rabbi Eliezer derive it ??? between ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them Back to the main body of the text: ??? the high priest Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is not "Kedushah" ??? and R' Elazar he said from the midst of ??? "Kedushah" ??? Rabbi Acha says: What is the reason? of Rabbi Yochanan Scripture states: (Lev. 6) the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) and after this ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? the high priest No. they were ??? except sends ??? and it was taught: Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? I was says sends ??? from his house morning, ??? from his house Arvit ??? Scripture states: ??? in the morning ??? must make restitution he sends ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Hey, isn't it the case that ??? it is written of it He said to him: No. ??? except ??? from his house and who that R' Yochanan said thus Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? Rav said: he does not ??? And R' Yochanan said: ??? and if ??? And if you say R' Yochanan the validity ??? No. he learns it For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say peace-offerings ??? kosher As it is written (Lev. 3) ??? he opens ??? festival that it should not be the subsidiary part a donkey ??? that I as it is taught: (Num. 7) ??? yes. ??? except peace-offerings ??? that is not ??? until that it should be ??? and he said Rabbi Yosei when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that his attention is not ??? but: at a time i.e., in a case whose knowledge ??? Rav ??? like who he reasons, If it was ??? And if you say Rav the validity ??? No. he learns it For didn't Rav say the afternoon service (Minchah) "Kedushah" without oil ??? which provides ??? without Watch out for leading vav frankincense which provides ??? without oil and without Watch out for leading vav frankincense which provides ??? a sinner on ??? Rav ??? Yochanan he reasons, Back to the main body of the text: Rav said the afternoon service (Minchah) "Kedushah" without oil ??? Dinah. ??? which provides ??? without Watch out for leading vav frankincense which provides ??? without oil and without Watch out for leading vav frankincense which provides ??? a sinner and oil frankincense my sanctity This without This and that one without This oil which provides ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at Watch out for leading vav frankincense which provides ??? And Rabbi ??? he said

דף ח,ב גמרא

No. -- this refers to "Kedushah" without -- this refers to and not -- this refers to "Kedushah" without -- this refers to to R' ??? For what reason ??? he does not ??? except ??? only. ??? he does not ??? without ??? a sinner ??? For what reason ??? of one suffering from tzara'at And even Shmuel derive it about this teaching of Rav For it was taught in a baraita implements of ??? ??? ??? And there is no meaning to the word implements of ??? ??? and not ??? ??? and Shmuel said They did not teach this לא שנו except ??? but: ??? ??? as it is said (Num. 7) both ??? with oil ??? He said to him Rav Acha ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? She He said to him No. ??? except ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense And if it enters your mind to argue that his reasoning is Shmuel yes. the afternoon service (Minchah) "Kedushah" until ??? all of them ??? in what way does It concerns itself Is it not the case that all of them ??? there are. because of the oil except Learn from this his reasoning is Shmuel This without ??? And if you wish, I would say the afternoon service (Minchah) to join with the body of blood ??? is comparable Back to the main body of the text: R' Elazar said the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? is valid which provides ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... R' ??? From here ??? en Beteira says from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: ??? From here ??? Already that it is possible that they said he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it that it is possible that they said He said to him R' Ya'akov to R' ??? son of ??? to you No. ??? except ??? all The Courtyard --- All of it that did not have shall you say Because and ascend The holiest of holy offerings the afternoon service (Minchah) The holiest of holy offerings Just as an elevation-offering require north Even the afternoon service (Minchah) require north Just as ??? which provides ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? on ??? Just as ??? which provides varieties of ??? also which provides varieties of ??? except It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say Because and then it is written (Lev. 2) ??? to ??? to the altar of ??? Just as ??? south ??? Even ??? also ??? south ??? Come and learn from this. Back to the main body of the text: that R' Yochanan said peace-offerings ??? are proper as it is said ??? he opens ??? festival and not ??? the subsidiary part a donkey from the essence They challenged him from this teaching: R' Yehudah en Beteira says from where do we learn ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles ??? enters ??? and they eat in the case of the holiest of holy offerings and the remnants i.e., leftovers of menuchot offerings: Scripture states:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.