It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פט,א גמרא

??? gold all ??? oil ??? It was taught: Rabbi Akiva says: Just as Therefore, scripture states: with oil with oil two occasions Watch out for leading vav !! And even It is not said except with oil one I was says Behold! he ??? The menuchot offerings: ??? now ??? with oil with oil you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? the scripture ??? after ??? one ??? he except Watch out for leading vav !! And even It is not said with oil all the essence I was says Behold! he ??? The menuchot offerings: ??? now as it is said with oil with oil you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? the scripture ??? It is possible ??? this ??? sectarians. ??? For as it says: with oil ??? that do not Scripture states: ??? oil ??? How so? sends ??? oil ??? He said to him: R' Elazar ben Azarya ??? if you ??? all the day all of it with oil with oil Really? listen to you except ??? oil ??? oil ??? and one ten day that are between a menstruant ??? The halacha is to Moses ??? he was ??? The Rabbis taught ??? Responded it is written (Lev. 14) ??? on ??? these are the words of the sages Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Eliezer say Even if the afternoon service (Minchah) of ??? It does not have except ??? as it is said (Lev. 14) ??? oil And Rabbi ??? and R' Eliezer ??? This ??? What then does it mean when it says my slave for him This certain individual ??? that he came the Merciful One in the Torah says he shall take one ??? And the other one ??? It is not necessary ??? the Merciful One regarding one suffering from tzara'at three ??? and three ??? Here in this case, ??? sacrifice one ??? And the other one It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that Because ??? the Merciful One upon it to include ??? I would say No. that ??? should request A general principle: And the other one ??? No. ??? And the rabbbis This ??? oil What then does it mean when it says my slave for him This certain individual ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) that did not have ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? And the other one both ??? Six ??? four ??? three ??? From where do we derive this? As it is written (Num. 28) ??? it shall be ??? there shall be As it is written (Ex. 30) oil olive tree ??? and then it is written (Ex. 30) oil ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use it shall be this for me ??? this in gematria ??? three ??? for all ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Ex. 27) est until mornings give to it ??? that it should be ??? est until mornings Another thing: est until mornings yes. to you the blessing of the Service ??? est until mornings except -- this refers to only. ??? the sages ??? From twilight and until daybreak that it is possible that they said upwards to the bottom ??? and there are that they said ??? is more ??? The one who said ??? is more ??? the Torah ??? on ??? of Israel and the one who said ??? to the bottom ??? yes. ??? in a place ???

דף פט,א משנה

we make an eruv ??? of an individual ???

דף פט,ב משנה

of day ??? but: yes. we make an eruv ??? and if ??? these before ??? and these before ??? are proper if before it was even the case that ??? is invalid, ??? that comes with ??? despite the fact ??? No. they were ???

דף פט,ב גמרא

They challenged this from a baraita: (Lev. 3) ??? that did not have ??? R' Yochanan said: if ??? he said If so, And there is no meaning to the word we make an eruv ??? And even if ??? also No. Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? these before ??? and these before ??? are proper from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching initially ??? he said Abayye said: This is what he means: we make an eruv ??? if it was combined ??? initially No. For it was taught: Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? and oil but: wine we make an eruv except Abayye said: This is what he means: in a case ??? we make an eruv wine initially in a case that is not ??? if it was combined ??? we make an eruv also ??? And if not, yes. we make an eruv Perhaps will come ??? and oil ??? that comes with ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 23) ??? two ??? on ??? that comes with ??? It is possible in the same way ??? thus in the same way And this is like the position ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 23) ??? wine ??? It is possible No. ??? And this is like the position ??? that is not ??? with ??? but: ??? with ??? Scripture states: ??? all ??? No. ??? except ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbi Eliezer said it is written ??? and we recite ??? How so? ??? Just as wine ??? Even oil also ??? that R' Yochanan said a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? that did not have ??? required ??? If you say that, ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? son of ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? that comes with ??? that did not have ??? shall be ??? If you say that, ??? The Tamid-offering of the morning ??? that did not have ??? required two ??? one ??? If you say that, ??? The Tamid-offering of twilight ??? that did not have ??? required two ??? with two priests ??? If you say that, ??? yes. So, here, except Abayye said: one ??? R' Abba -- he said This is satisfactory ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.