It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

(in Numbers 18) ??? Hey, isn't it the case that why do I have he read Let us say, ??? festival ??? and not ??? the subsidiary part a donkey from the essence the blessing of the Service ??? in a place his rabbi; say that it should not be the subsidiary part a donkey from the essence food that do not a person he eats in a place his rabbi; The reason is ??? he read this one it is not written: he read No. ??? the subsidiary part a donkey from the essence No. ??? it was said: ??? except ??? The Courtyard --- R' Yochanan said: is invalid Reish Lakish: he said is valid Reish Lakish: he said is valid As it is written poured upon it oil and gave upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? to My son, ??? the priests. ??? the commandments the priesthood ??? on ??? and by night ??? No. ??? also No. ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid immediately ??? in a vessel he ??? No. ??? Regardless, ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of R' Yochanan ??? is valid except ??? it was said: the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? before ??? R' Yochanan said: ??? from the midst of his house ??? he said No. ??? from the midst of his house ??? R' Yochanan said: sends from the midst of his house ??? for him ??? he said No. ??? from the midst of his house ??? the sanctity of implements of ??? for him ??? R' Yochanan ??? lacking ??? if before it was even the case that poured ??? it was said: ??? between ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them ??? he said yes. ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Eliezer ??? does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yehoshua For it was taught in a baraita ??? he loses it ??? R' Eliezer is valid ??? Rabbi Yehoshua is invalid one ??? Joshua and one ??? Up to this point, did not say Rabbi Yehoshua there i.e., in another mishna except that is not ??? but: in a case ??? Even if R' Yehoshua give thanks for him as it is taught: R' Yehoshua says all ??? from them an olive's volume meat or an olive's volume milk ??? the blood ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk he does not ??? the blood the case is that of an elevation-offering, Even if ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk ??? the blood because of ??? All of it ??? and at Minchah even though ??? standing No. ???

דף ט,ב גמרא

the afternoon service (Minchah) What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Pappa said: the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? I thought to say Because ??? zevach-offering We come to compare For ??? is comparable Come and learn from this. and one ??? that I Here in this case, For scripture said: (Lev. 6) ??? from the Minchah ??? the Minchah until ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) No. ??? And the other one from the Minchah the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Already ??? in the hour of ??? even though ??? It is not ??? R' Yochanan ??? before it was even the case that ??? is invalid, And there is no meaning to the word ??? upon it ??? and if ??? to the sun ??? is invalid, ??? upon it ??? and Rabbi Eliezer said No. ??? actually and really except immediately arrived ??? to section And even though that did not have ??? He said to him So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer She He said to him I I thought to say to you ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? for me Rabbi Eliezer If it was R' Eliezer why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? Even if ??? also ??? He was silent. But why? ??? Let us say, for him community that I Because ??? also ??? Rav Adda bar Ahava said This one says ??? he is equivalent. And there is no meaning to the word the master of the master of ??? Rav ??? and he said about this teaching ??? He said to him Rav Yosef son of for Rav, heard him ??? Are we are not dealing of Rabbi Yochanan ??? She ??? Rav said ??? a Tanna taught: one (Lev. 2) ??? Any thing that was is invalid (Lev. 2) ??? Any thing that was is invalid, And another teaching "and the remainder" from the Minchah creates an exclusion ??? She ??? or in the case that one is not ??? anything two ??? why do I have Is this not one ??? before ??? and one ??? between ??? of R' Yochanan ??? No. one ??? before ??? For if it was sends from his house ??? yes. and if No. No. and one ??? between ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them those particular ??? are forbidden as regard to eating, ??? them according to the words of One who says ??? between ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them those particular ??? Just as there are. in cases regarding eating he said ??? Scripture states: "and the remainder" and not Watch out for leading vav "and the remainder" from Watch out for leading vav "and the remainder" And Rabbi ??? he said ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? From where do we derive this? Rabbi Zeira said For scripture said: (Lev. 9) ??? the Minchah "And he filled ??? from it ??? this Really? know What then? For as it says: (Lev. 14) ??? the oil poured on ??? here, ??? this one in all places as it is said ??? he does not except ??? Hey, isn't it the case that should bring himself ??? other than this it is written and so go ahead and say yes. ??? after ??? except ??? other than this it is written here, ??? And there is no meaning to the word after ??? and so go ahead and say ??? Just as here, ??? Even in reality also ??? four ??? are written two ??? and two ??? He said to him: R' ??? to Rabbi Zeira on of them ??? and on of them ??? As it is written ??? why do I have

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.