It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צא,א גמרא

Because and then it is written and from ??? like who As it is written ??? he is equivalent. and to Rebbi ??? for he said: even though that is not it is written ??? like who As it is written ??? he is equivalent. that he read should request it is written (Lev. 1) if an elevation-offering its sacrifice from the morning (Lev. 1) and if from ??? its sacrifice And the other one It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say What case is he dealing with? ??? but: ??? he shall take ??? Come and learn from this. Mar said: a thangkgiving-offering from where do we learn Scripture states: or zevach-offering because a thangkgiving-offering Is this not zevach-offering he It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that Because and there are bread ??? No. ??? and what is the difference here, ??? a Nazir That there are ??? bread he is required ??? You might have thought that I would say that there i.e., in another mishna two sectarians. Here in this case, ??? sectarians. Come and learn from this. and let the Merciful One write in the Torah (Num. 15) ??? or ??? and it does not require an elevation-offering If it was it is not written: the Merciful One an elevation-offering then I might incorrectly say: ??? a woman to Hashem A general principle: ??? or ??? creates an exclusion ??? and A general principle: had a vision A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? a thing that is not came on Watch out for leading vav he sinned Even all that do not came on Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering that are have come on Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? first-born ??? Passover that do not have come on Watch out for leading vav he sinned Scripture states: an elevation-offering now As it is written an elevation-offering A general principle: and creates an exclusion Just as ??? of him. Just as ??? that is not ??? Even all that is not ??? holy offerings ??? and ascend ??? from ??? and a guilt-offering ??? and all ??? that did not have ??? and now that you said or ??? or ??? why do I have ??? It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that until ??? No. that ??? should request Come and learn from this. ??? that ??? should request and if Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? he shall take ??? This is satistfactory to Rabbi ??? except to R' ??? why do I have ??? I thought to say Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? that ??? should request Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? that ??? should request Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? Come and learn from this. or ??? why do I have You might have thought that I would say that that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי that he came ??? an elevation-offering ??? and peace-offerings ??? So, too, ??? but: in a case that he came ??? an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? So, too, an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? in that place ??? one in that place ??? One She ??? for him ??? Come and learn from this. or ??? (Num. 15) And so shall you do son of mornings an elevation-offering or zevach-offering why do I have It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? in a case that he came ??? an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? So, too, an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? but: in a case that he came ??? two ??? one ??? and one ??? So, too, two peace-offerings one ??? and one ??? I would say in that place peace-offerings One She in that place an elevation-offering One She ??? for him ??? Come and learn from this. (Num. 15) ??? or peace-offerings why do I have You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? two ??? one ??? and one ??? So, too, two peace-offerings one ??? and one ??? but: in a case that he came ??? two ??? and two ??? So, too, two peace-offerings ??? and a second person peace-offerings ??? in that place an elevation-offering one he in that place ??? one he ??? for him ??? Come and learn from this. And Rabbi ??? This from the morning or from ??? why do I have You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? ??? varieties of but: it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? for him ??? Come and learn from this. (Num. 15) ??? to one why do I have For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Behold! ??? "In the case of this one after that one," but: "At the same time," ??? for him ??? except ??? of one suffering from tzara'at ??? required ??? From where do we derive this? ??? (Lev. 14) and three ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) at Minchah ??? with ??? is what the scripture says. You say at Minchah ??? with ??? Or perhaps, except at Minchah ??? in its own right For as it says: (Lev. 14) and raised up ??? The elevation-offering and the Minchah you shall says at Minchah ??? with ??? is what the scripture says. ??? Really? know if require ??? And if not, Scripture states: (Num. 15) and wine ??? shall you do on The elevation-offering or ??? the one an elevation-offering -- this refers to ??? one suffering from tzara'at zevach-offering -- this refers to A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at or ??? -- this refers to a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at Is it not enough for him both of them. An altar of

דף צא,ב גמרא

As Mar said: A sin-offering and a guilt-offering from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: zevach-offering What case is he dealing with? in a case ??? For ??? but: in a case ??? and A sin-offering ??? in the case of two ??? zevach-offering -- this refers to A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at and so go ahead and say -- this refers to A sin-offering and a guilt-offering ??? No. You might have thought as it is taught: (Num. 5) ??? is what the scripture says. You say ??? Or perhaps, except even A sin-offering Scripture states: (Num. 5) and ??? may he do it? zevach-offering peace-offerings ??? a ram are in the general category he was and for what reason he has fulfilled his obligation ??? Just as a ram ??? came ??? Even all came ??? an elevation-offering -- this refers to ??? one suffering from tzara'at and so go ahead and say -- this refers to ??? she will give birth Abayye said: ??? she will give birth from the end of the teaching: ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says ??? -- this refers to ??? she will give birth the one this one ten of tithe ??? that did not have ??? to it in all the Torah that it should be the subsidiary part a donkey from the essence Rava said: Who is a thing ??? three ??? you shall says -- this refers to one suffering from tzara'at ??? why do I have Rav Sheshet said ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even of ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even of ??? You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? ??? but: for an individual No. and what is the difference here, ??? she will give birth You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? a thing that do not ??? to him time but: a thing ??? to him time I would say No. Come and learn from this. or ??? why do I have ??? ??? This is satistfactory to R' Yochanan for he said: the son of he For it was taught in a baraita bring offerings sends upon it ??? a ram and does not an elevation-offering to him ??? And R' Yochanan said or ??? ??? except for there to be wheat ??? for he said: ??? and he would say over ??? he It was necessary to provide both opinions he read ??? doubt ??? for there to be wheat ??? it is a problem (Num. 15) ??? may he do it? ??? the one or ??? the one or ??? or ??? the one Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? the scripture between ??? a ram ??? It is possible ??? between ??? A bull ??? Scripture states: ??? the one or ??? Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? the scripture between ??? son of year" ??? son of two It is possible ??? between ??? son of two ??? son of three Scripture states: or ??? the one or ??? Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? the scripture between ??? a ram It is possible ??? between ??? Scripture states: or ??? or ??? Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? the scripture between ??? a ram It is possible ??? between ??? a male goat Therefore, scripture states: or ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? to us Raba

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.