It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קב,א גמרא

(Deut. 12) It may not be eaten ??? with ??? R' Yehudah and R' Elazar reason that all that you ??? on ??? you ??? on ??? and Behold! ??? also Because And you, ??? on their blood you ??? on ??? And the rabbbis reason that It may not be eaten ??? with ??? except meat ??? all ??? is permitted. you ??? on ??? and all that do not ??? is permitted. If it was you ??? on ??? And R' Yehudah what is the purpose according to him he read he shall take prohibits ??? on prohibits ??? which provides ??? accustomed ??? yes. Here, too, And so It is necessary to teach this he read to Rabbi ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? from ??? accustomed ??? raw lit., living and "uf" between that is tamei between that is tahor as it is said (Deut. 12) He spat ??? the blood all that you ??? on ??? you ??? on ??? and all ??? you ??? on ??? If it was you ??? on ??? these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer But the sages say: is not customary except ??? as it is said It may not be eaten ??? with ??? except meat ??? all ??? is permitted. you ??? on ??? and all that do not ??? is permitted. yes. you ??? on ??? R' Meir says is not customary except ??? that is tahor only. ??? Shmuel ??? Rabbah said son of Watch out for leading vav And Shmuel said Rav Chisda (and there are those who say Rav Yosef And there are those who say it was Rabbah said son of ??? Rav Chisdah said (and there are those who say Rav Yosef And there are those who say it was Rabbah son of ??? Rav Chisdah said (and there are those who say Rav Yosef What is the reason? of Rabbi Meir Scripture states: (Deut. 12) ??? Rav Gidel said that Rav said It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are ??? on ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? from ??? son of ??? upon it on ??? and a Jew lit, Israel he does not ??? except on ??? only. that it is possible that they said that is tahor ??? that it is possible that they said ??? And the rabbbis Rav said ??? Even We also ??? he ate ??? from ??? from it he does not ??? forty And there is no meaning to the word ??? in what way Shall I say ??? This is obvious! ??? except Is this not ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Rabbi with whom does it agree? son of ??? pointed out a contradiction. But the beginning of the teaching, ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? Rav said ??? from ??? It is necessary for him an olive's volume What is the reason מאי טעמא food "writing" of him. He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? he ate ??? from ??? from it he does not ??? ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? and if You might have thought in the case of an olive's volume Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? an olive's volume Like that which was said by Rav ??? meat ??? Here in this case, also, ??? meat ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rav

דף קב,ב גמרא

he ate a bird that is tahor ??? in all that he was ??? in the amount like an olive and that is tamei between ??? between ??? in all that he was Here in this case, also, ??? meat ??? Come and hear: he took a bird in which is not an olive's volume and he ate Rabbi exempts and R' Elazar son of Rabbi Shimon he is obligated R' Eliezer said ??? Shimon is a kal vachomer on ??? from it he is liable on All of it is it not all the more so? ??? the words of all are in the amount like an olive Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? reasoned ??? is standing and one master reasons that ??? Is this not ??? is standing ??? from this No. in the case of an olive's volume Rav Nachman said ??? meat ??? and who that it is possible something ??? is not there? an olive's volume meat it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? an olive's volume ??? meat ??? Rav said ??? yes. ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? the words of all are in the amount like an olive Hey, isn't it the case that ??? "uf" tamei he And Rav says that is tamei between ??? between ??? except similar to ??? Rabba said: ??? reasoned Rabbi ??? they eat her name ??? All of it he is liable He said to him Abaye and who that it is possible something For this he has already eaten after No. ??? and he has already eaten This ??? He said to him: this on account of ??? and this on account of ??? Rabba said: if ??? to say reasoned R' Elazar son of R' Shimon ??? they eat her name ??? raw lit., living is exempt He said to him Abaye and who that it is possible something For this he has already eaten after he is obligated and he has already eaten This is exempt He said to him this on account of ??? and this on account of ??? R' Yochanan said: (Deut. 12) It may not be eaten ??? with ??? this ??? from ??? (Ex. 22) meat in the field ??? No. ??? this meat from ??? meat from ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said It may not be eaten ??? with ??? this ??? from ??? meat from ??? meat in the field ??? No. ??? this meat from ??? he ate ??? from ??? meat from ??? to R' Yochanan he is liable two ??? son of ??? he is not liable except One he ate meat from ??? meat from ??? son of ??? he is liable two to R' Yochanan he is not liable except One he ate ??? from ??? meat from ??? according to the words of The entirety he is liable two They challenged this from a baraita:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.