It's a start Dafcast Draft
ראש השנה
מועד קטן
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
עבודה זרה


Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits


This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.


This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."


I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קח,א גמרא

all ??? are forbidden ??? are permitted there i.e., in another mishna this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Master, son of Rav Ashi ??? upon it

דף קח,א משנה

??? milk ??? on ??? if there are of it ??? is forbidden ??? ??? if there are of it ??? forbidden

דף קח,א גמרא

Abayye said: ??? and not ??? in reality a law established by the Torah For if it was You might have thought is a law established by the Rabbis ??? What is the reason? No. we complete it ??? he If it was ??? he Even though it will be ??? he gives ??? also He said to him: Raba a way ??? Torah Rav said immediately ??? herself she was made ??? all ??? all of them because of that are ??? He said to him: Mar Zutra the son of of Rav ??? Rav like who he said ??? like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? No. ??? Let us say, disagrees ??? for he said: Raba his reasoning is Rabbi Yehudah Any thing that was ??? and Another thing: ??? ??? that is not but when it is not ??? Rabbah upon it ??? He said to him: If it was ??? Here, too, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? and What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is ??? is permitted. ??? why is it that she was made ??? except his reasoning is ??? is forbidden ??? Rav And Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Yochanan that they said ??? is forbidden Shmuel and Rabbi Shimon son of Rabbi ??? that they said ??? is permitted. reasoned Rav ??? is forbidden ??? an olive's volume meat ??? of milk Rav said meat is forbidden and milk is permitted. and if You might have thought ??? is forbidden

דף קח,ב גמרא

milk why is it that is permitted. milk ??? he In reality lit: In the world his reasoning is Rav ??? is forbidden and It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Ex. 23) No. ??? of its mother ??? Torah and not milk reasoned Rav ??? Torah and not milk Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk ??? this with that Rav said ??? on ??? and does not ??? on ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? Torah and not milk ??? why is it that ??? the measure he But rather, in reality lit: in the world, his reasoning is Rav milk he also forbids it. and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? No. ??? the end of the end of For ??? he returns ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? olive tree meat ??? olive tree milk ??? this with that Rav said ??? on ??? and does not ??? on ??? Just as your soul If it was combine together ??? also ??? If it was No. combine together ??? also No. ??? In reality lit: In the world No. ??? that is large and Levi said Even ??? on ??? and thus It was taught by Levi ??? in the same way ??? on ??? thus in the same way ??? on ??? this ??? And they said ??? they eat that specific ??? himself ??? She as it is taught: ??? milk ??? on ??? immediately that was given ??? herself ??? all ??? all of them because of that are ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah but the sages say until ??? he said Rabbi can be seen these are the words of R' Yehudah ??? or in the case that one is not ??? these are the words of the sages ??? What then does it mean when it says No. ??? and not ??? Shall I say No. ??? A general principle: and not ??? A general principle: ??? No. ??? So rather, No. ??? at the beginning except in the rear of and not ??? at the beginning except in the rear of why is it that this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? his reasoning is ??? is forbidden

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.