It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קט,א גמרא

from this general principle it would follow with R' Yehudah reasoned For ??? from the beginning and until the end of ??? from the beginning and until the end of is forbidden why is it that this one No. ??? A general principle: I would say No. ??? proper proper and not ??? proper proper Mar said: these are the words of the sages ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? in the rear of and not ??? at the beginning ??? in the rear of and not ??? at the beginning ??? can be seen these are the words of R' Yehudah In this case, except ??? from the beginning and until the end of ??? from the beginning and until the end of from this general principle it would follow is a law established by the Rabbis reason that ??? in the rear of and not ??? at the beginning ??? in the rear of and not ??? at the beginning is permitted. Perhaps, They reason ??? is permitted. He said to him Rav Acha ??? From where can you derive ??? Perhaps ??? the words of all are is forbidden and here in this other case, ??? And Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: ??? No. ??? And the rabbbis ??? that they said ??? This What then does it mean when it says If you say, This is satisfactory is a law established by the Rabbis ??? Here in this case, like Rabbi Yehudah they both reason this way ??? we were for he says Rabbi can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. In this case, these are the words of the sages In this case, except If you say, ??? the words of all are is forbidden and here in this other case, ??? what they disagree about This can be seen these are the words of R' Yehudah And there is no meaning to the word can be seen he had asked for him And naught else something

דף קט,א משנה

??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it

דף קט,ב גמרא

Rabbi Zeira said Rav said he does not transgresses upon it and it is permitted Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: he does not transgresses upon it ??? he that is not he crossed but nevertheless a prohibition does apply to it. In justice, he ??? also there is not in this case. ??? at the end of the teaching, the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it there i.e., in another mishna ??? he that is not he crossed but nevertheless a prohibition does apply to it. a Tanna taught: also But the beginning of the teaching, he does not transgresses upon it Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? after ??? and it is permitted heart he who seeks ??? but: ??? it does not require ??? Perhaps heart he ??? for him ??? but: ??? No. ??? for him ??? and there are that they said R' Zayra said: Rav said he does not transgresses upon it is forbidden Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: he does not transgresses upon it ??? he that is not he crossed but nevertheless a prohibition does apply to it. In justice, he ??? also there is not in this case. ??? at the end of the teaching, the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it for in that place ??? he that is not he crossed but nevertheless a prohibition does apply to it. a Tanna taught: also But the beginning of the teaching, he does not transgresses upon it Come and hear: ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? he does not transgresses upon it the heart ??? and sends forth ??? No. ??? after ??? and it is permitted heart he who seeks ??? but: ??? it does not require ??? Perhaps heart he ??? for him ??? but: ??? No. ??? for him ??? It was taught: ??? that came first of Rav ??? is permitted. ??? is forbidden for just as ??? between this to this this collected ??? and this yes. collected ??? How so? ??? Rav Yehudah said ??? two and evening ??? in a wall He said to him R' Elazar ??? for me and I ??? And what can we come and learn from this? Our mishna She Thus can we come and learn from this. that is not in the case of two and evening ??? in a wall he said for him ??? for Rav, ??? all ??? to us the Merciful One ??? to us ??? to us the blood ??? to us ??? a menstruant blood ??? milk livestock milk raw lit., living ??? a man a divorcee ??? in the case of ??? He said to them Rav ??? to it ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? This certain individual ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted ??? for even in the case where initially ??? that he came he is required ??? at the end of the teaching, ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.