It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יב,א גמרא

Passover and holy offerings What is there to say? except in a case where it is possible ??? in a case where it is not possible No. ??? So, here, in a case where it is possible ??? in a case where it is not possible No. ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav said he saw one ??? if ??? from the beginning and until the end of is permitted. to eat ??? And if not, is forbidden to eat ??? How so? If it was ??? why do I have he saw and if ??? that is not ??? This is obvious! So rather, that is not know If it was ??? If it was No. ??? Let us say, most of ??? next to ??? there are. who was not taught? Behold! ??? or who said ??? "Go!" ??? he has walked and found ??? Perhaps, say most of ??? next to ??? there are. Here in this case, also, Let us say, most of ??? next to ??? there are. In reality lit: In the world ??? that is not ??? For example, ??? one a sign of then the ruling is acceptable. What would you have said? ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? also then the ruling is acceptable. Come and learn from this. This ??? for him Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one lest ??? lest ??? Rav Dimi brought this very question son of Joseph ??? One who says ??? "Go!" ??? he has walked and found ??? What then? He said to him: ??? One who says ??? "Go!" ??? he has walked and found ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him: yes. ??? Just as your soul If it was ??? makes ??? even terumah also and if yes. ??? makes ??? even ??? also did not say to him ??? He ascended ??? In reality lit: In the world yes. ??? makes ??? So, too, perhaps, a person other than this "Hear!" and He went ??? most of ??? next to ??? there are. terumah perhaps, a person other than this "Hear!" and He went he separated terumah it was. for him separates terumah that did not have ??? that did not have ??? yes. its terumah terumah Let us say, most of ??? next to ??? there are. ??? She as it is taught: Behold! ??? to him ??? he has walked ??? Rabbi Yehudah ??? Rabbi ??? his son of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean permits he said Rabbi can be seen items of Rabbi Yehudah ??? in the dunghill these are the words of Rabbi ??? his son of R' Yosi the Gallilean ??? in the house of Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? say most of ??? next to ??? there are. and one master reasons that we do not say most of ??? next to ??? there are. Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world most of ??? next to ??? there are. in the house of ??? does not disagree who permits in the dunghill ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: in the dunghill ??? a person ??? in the dunghill ??? and one master reasons that yes. a person ??? in the dunghill ??? Mar said: he said Rabbi can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. ??? in the dunghill What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? except Is this not This is obvious! in the dunghill ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, these are the words of Rabbi ??? his son of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean ??? in the house of What then does it mean when it says the house of Shall I say the house of actually and really ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree who permits except This is obvious! in the dunghill ??? it is a problem of Rabbi ???

דף יב,ב גמרא

thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: can be seen these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. to Rabbi ??? his son of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean in the dunghill ??? Rabbi ??? his son of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean No. ??? upon it except in the dunghill ??? but: in the dunghill ??? he would acknowledge the correct position of for him and can be seen ??? except for a deaf-mute and a child lest ??? ??? lest ??? No. The tanna teaches: except lest ??? Rabba said: This one says yes. ??? to them Those who are ill ??? and all of them ??? and others saw ??? are slaughtered ??? Which Tanna taught: that is not in the case of concentration and intent. ??? Rabba said: Rabbi Natan She for it teaches: ??? their blood ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? in a wall and the halacha is and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? Rabbi Natan considers it proper and the sages invalidate it he It was taught by to it This is only in the case he said to it The halacha is like Rabbi he gave Hey, isn't it the case that in the case of ??? and sends ??? and she entered ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said he is required Rabbi Yochanan a child he has ??? or he (??? ) does not have He said to him Rabbi Ami ??? for him It once happened What is the difference It once happened that is not ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? for him For it was taught in a baraita there is regarding them It once happened ??? also No. ??? for him For it was taught in a baraita Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? of them ??? or ??? to the hands of ??? because of in which they have It once happened

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.