It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכ,א גמרא

with our Mishna ??? and etc. combine together ??? they eat Raysh Lakish said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? that there is ??? but: Let him say did not occur ??? And R' Yochanan said: even Let him say also ??? He said to him Reish Lakish: to R' Yochanan and who that it is possible ??? atop ??? He disagreed with this Rav Acha Except I can object with text from here: tefillin in what way does ??? this one in the case of "writing" he was astonished there is not in this case. ??? this one that they said in the west all ??? transgresses upon it he does not ??? R' Yochanan ??? in which there is upon it an olive's volume meat ??? that is coming out from him ??? tamei Is this not It is because of this: ??? No. It is because of this: a hand Let him say One for what ??? Like that which was said by Rabbi ??? that are between ??? So, here, ??? that are between ??? in a case it was said: of Rabbi ??? to this other teaching For it was taught in a baraita ??? impart tumah ??? And there is no meaning to the word combine together ??? for what ??? he said Rabbi ??? that are between ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabba said: ??? He said to him Abaye should it itself ??? they eat except milk ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? For No. ??? also for he said: ??? brine for upon regarding ??? by day ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? he in all ??? Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? he If it was ??? If it was No. ??? No. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbah said ??? He said to him Abaye should it itself ??? they eat except Rav Pappa said: ??? It was taught there: ??? the blood and he ate or ??? ??? he is liable This is satisfactory ??? the blood and he ate immediately ??? except ??? ??? food ??? of him. Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not food She he said Reish Lakish: Scripture states: (Lev. 7) ??? one who drinks It was taught: also regarding chametz ??? if chametz he ??? he is spiritually cut off if ??? She yes. a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover This is satisfactory if ??? She yes. a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover (Deut. 17) bread ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and that one Is this not bread ??? he except if chametz he ??? he is spiritually cut off food ??? of him. Raysh Lakish said Scripture states: (Ex. 12) ??? one who drinks and it was taught: also regarding ??? "uf" tahor ??? tamei ??? tahor and we were at of it food it is written of him. Raysh Lakish said Scripture states: (Lev. 17) ??? one who drinks If so, ??? also ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: milk chametz No. will come of him which provides No. it was to him ??? No. will come of him which provides ??? he is spiritually cut off and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: chametz milk No. will come of him which provides No. ??? No. We come to compare of him which provides ??? he is spiritually cut off and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? No. We come to compare ??? which provides imparts tumah one ??? No. We come to compare ??? one ??? Which ??? No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? he is spiritually cut off No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? Just as ??? which provides No. it was to them ??? No. let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? Just as ??? which provides No. ??? shall you say ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say milk livestock ??? also ??? "uf" ??? So rather, milk raw lit., living ??? also ??? to the priests In reality lit: In the world milk raw lit., living ??? and that he came it is a problem to you priests priests ??? that is high ??? and this one that teaches ??? that are theirs why do I have ??? from those It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was it is not written: the Merciful One then I might incorrectly say: ??? in going from justice. to be ??? Just as there i.e., in another mishna until That there are an olive's volume So, too, here in this case, also, until That there are an olive's volume

דף קכ,ב גמרא

??? the Merciful One ??? It is because of this: That there are ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? and this one that teaches ??? all of them ??? from them ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? Just as ??? which provides prohibits that comes upon it. are they, this accounts in a case which is a prohibition came upon it. in a case ??? prohibits that comes upon it. From where do we derive this? we complete it ??? From where do we derive this? for it teaches: R' Yosi ??? you sends and if you sends ??? grapes ??? from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: (Deut. 27) ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? except ??? and terumah ??? From where do we derive this? ??? As Mar said: (Deut. 12) and terumah of your hand. these ??? Just as ??? which provides we are guilty on its account death plus a fifth except ??? Just as ??? which provides they are obligated upon them death plus a fifth except We come to compare ??? and one ??? or ??? and one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita honey ??? and wine ??? and vinegar ??? but the remainder of varieties of fruits of terumah Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated the principal amount plus a fifth and R' Yehoshua exempts in what way ??? what they disagree about of Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? Just as ??? that is coming out from them ??? Even terumah also ??? that is coming out from them ??? Just as ??? Even if the remainder of sectarians. Even terumah also even the remainder of sectarians. and Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned ??? Just as ??? from them ??? Even terumah ??? from them ??? Just as ??? from terumah ??? yes. something other than this No. Even ??? from them ??? yes. something other than this No. Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita yes. bring in ??? except that is coming out from ??? and from ??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yehoshua She for he said: ??? them ??? Hey, isn't it the case that For it was taught in a baraita yes. ??? ??? It is because of this: orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree except on that is coming out from ??? and from ??? with whom does it agree? Rabbi Yehoshua She for he said: ??? them ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.