It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכא,א גמרא

and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? to it ??? What then does it mean when it says offal Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? and Reish Lakish: he said meat ??? They challenged him from this teaching: (Job 13) ??? "You ??? that is false ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: ??? we were ??? son of ??? he except for one for he said: meat ??? son of ??? he ??? does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? Come and hear: R' Yehuda says: ??? if there are an olive's volume in one place we are guilty on its account Rav Huna said This is only in the case ??? This is satisfactory ??? meat ??? we were and so when that it is possible an olive's volume ??? except ??? For that it is possible an olive's volume What then does it mean when it says you shall wood in reality he According to the opinion of R' Yehudah does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis R' Yochanan said: ??? also ??? he said ??? meat ??? but: ??? No. ??? This meat ??? How so? If it was ??? upon it Even if ??? and if that is not He accounts for upon it ??? Rabbi Avin: And Rabbi ??? One says partially ??? upon it and one says partially ??? raw lit., living and partially ??? It was taught there: ??? and impart tumah and combine together ??? wood in reality he Rabbi Eliezer said ??? also wood in reality he Rav Pappa said: ??? of on high." ??? Rabbi Eliezer said a place ??? in the case of the flesh. ??? Rav Pappa said: in a place ??? and he goes out from them ??? one like it; ??? he said abbi Assi ??? Israel ??? some texts say: and a worshipper of stars some texts say: and a gentile ??? they all require ??? water from someplace else ??? why do I have ??? is stricter and all ??? is stricter it does not require ??? for it was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael (Lev. 11) And so ??? water on seed Just as ??? that do not ??? is stricter they all require ??? Even all that do not ??? is stricter It is necessary for him ??? and it was taught: R' Yosi said On account of what did they say ??? "uf" tahor it requires ??? It is not it requires ??? because of

דף קכא,ב גמרא

??? is stricter he said ??? Because It is possible ??? on less than an olive's volume He said to him R' ??? to Rabbi Zeira And who said it? ??? thus Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: ??? of it two or most of two ??? She ??? Hezekiyah said: It is not ??? R' Yochanan said: that is old ??? Hezekiyah said: It is not ??? She Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: that is old ??? Is this not ??? She He said to him Came forth from this general principle it would follow raw lit., living ??? No. ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? of it two or most of two ??? She ??? Hezekiyah said: It is not ??? R' Yochanan said: that is old ??? R' Eliezer said ??? about this teaching of R' Yochanan into your hand For Rav learned: ??? For Rav learned: ??? Israel ??? livestock that is tamei some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? of it two or most of two ??? imparts tumah ??? they eat but not ??? from it ??? from ??? meat ??? from it ??? from ??? is forbidden to the children of ??? And even if after ??? of it one or most of one It is not imparts tumah ??? they eat ??? there is not there ??? of anything some texts say: and a worshipper of stars some texts say: and a gentile ??? livestock that is tahor to Israel ??? imparts tumah ??? they eat but not ??? from it ??? from ??? meat ??? from it ??? from ??? is forbidden to the children of ??? and even after ??? of it one or most of one It is not imparts tumah ??? they eat ??? there is not there ??? of anything ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? in a place that does not do anything it ??? came Israel ??? is valid ??? Israel between in a place which does it ??? or whether in a place that does not do anything it ??? came some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? is invalid One who wishes ??? before ??? an olive's volume meat from the house of Its slaughter ??? proper proper ??? proper proper ??? to it until ??? one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and one Israel are permitted in it That would be a support to him. To whose position? for Rav, Idi bar Avin for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin R' Yitzchak said son of ??? One who wishes ??? an olive's volume meat from the house of ??? proper proper ??? proper proper ??? to it until ??? one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and one Israel ??? in it he is required R' Elazar ??? of it ??? of it What then? He said to him This certain individual elder thus that R' Yochanan said it requires ??? that is tahor ??? for what Rav said Shmuel son of Isaac ??? Rabbi brought this very question Zeira ??? What then? ??? on ??? He said to him imparts tumah ??? they eat ??? He said to him It is not imparts tumah ??? and not ??? Abayye said: It is not ??? on ??? for it is the case that imparts tumah ??? they eat ??? he is liable for it is the case that It is not imparts tumah ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? Rav Huna said This is only in the case ??? Rav Huna said two ??? atop ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.