It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קכד,א גמרא

until that it should be in the land." Rabbi Meir says: it is not necessary for him No. ??? ??? and not until that it should be in the land." except ??? handbreadths For ??? to it ??? from this tahor why is it that Let us say, this one ??? and he arises He said to him: Raba and so go ahead and say According to Rabbinic law, ??? ??? until that it should be in the land." except Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: an oven that became tamei, How so? ??? that specific the words of all are ??? that three ??? ??? until that it should be in the land." and One who wishes that did not have ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? How so? he makes ??? that three ??? ??? until that it should be in the land." Rabbi Meir says: it is not necessary for him No. ??? ??? and not until that it should be in the land." except ??? handbreadths Mar said: ??? that three They challenged this from a baraita: an oven ??? four ??? four these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: in the case of a child. ??? Any thing that was ??? and how much time is the duration of Any thing that was They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? which provides ??? the daughters of ??? The reason is That there are ??? four Watch out for leading vav And that is absent here ??? four tahor They said: there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? Mar said: ??? the majority of his body ??? for what you shall Abayye said: the remnants i.e., leftovers of The greatness ??? rabbis four There is no difficulty. this one ??? son of nine this one ??? son of seven ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And there are those who say it was Rav Huna said It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael the son of Rabbi Yosi and even ??? of it so that ??? Raysh Lakish said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? He accounts for And Rabbi Yochanan said: even ??? also No. He accounts for ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? tamei ??? upon it ??? immediately ??? in it ??? tahor these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. But the sages say: until ??? handbreadths For ??? from this tahor why is it that Let us say, He accounts for Here in this case, with what are we dealing? that he came he is required for him ??? One suffering from gonorrhea

דף קכד,א משנה

??? in which there is upon it an olive's volume meat ??? that is coming out from him ??? tamei they were upon it ??? become tamei by being carried and not ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: No. ??? and not by being carried give thanks Rabbi Akiva with two ??? that he was tamei And on account of what Rabbi Akiva ??? because of ???

דף קכד,א גמרא

Ulla said Rabbi Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? raw lit., living but: ??? He said to him: Rav ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: even ??? He said to him: yes. and even ??? He said to him yes. He said to him God if He said to me: Rabbi Yochanan ??? No. ??? for him For ??? Rav Oshaya: he found for him to Rabbi Ami he said ??? in front Thus said ??? So, too, here, ??? for him Rav ??? He said to him but on account of of Rav ??? of the academy of ??? he ??? of R' Yochanan There were times when he found ??? and he said to it ??? they were upon it two ??? by being carried and not ??? these are the words of R' Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: No. ??? and not by being carried that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? raw lit., living but: ??? He said to him Master, ??? he would say over to it He said to him yes. So rather, ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text he said ??? He said to him yes. He said to him God If it was He said to me: Joshua bin Nun in the name No. ??? for him For he came ??? and all and I shall grant rest ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text So rather, it is a problem Like that which was said by Rav ???

דף קכד,ב גמרא

??? Here in this case, also, ??? they were ??? he said son of ??? They did not teach such a ruling except from behind him but: before Him." there are ??? and he returns ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: yes. ??? and he returns ??? And he is consistent Rabbi Yochanan with his reasoning for he said: Rabbi Yochanan Rabbi Yishmael And Rabbi ??? son of ??? And they said a thing one Rabbi Yishmael this one of which we were speaking? Rabbi ??? son of ??? For it was taught in a baraita all ??? the house R' ??? son of ??? and the sages ??? Is this not he said Rabbi ??? son of ??? there i.e., in another mishna yes. ??? and he returns ??? Here in this case, also, yes. ??? and he returns ??? and from that of Rabbi ??? son of ??? like Rabbi Yishmael rabbis like Rabbi ??? Hey, isn't it the case that R' ??? Up to this point, No. ??? Rabbi Akiva except ??? but: in reality become tamei ??? at the end of the teaching, give thanks Rabbi Akiva ??? that he was tamei And on account of what Rabbi Akiva ??? because of ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? son of Chama (Lev. 11) ??? and not ??? in which there is upon it two ??? It is possible Even by being carried Scripture states: (Lev. 11) and One who married ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: ??? and One who married ??? came came ??? does not come ??? does not come ??? and if ??? Behold! came ??? before Him." Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? came in all trapping of came ??? does not come ??? in all trapping of does not come ??? Rav Aviya brought this very question elder ??? son of Rav Huna ??? to Rabbi Yishmael What then? ??? it has to R' Yishmael ??? came came ??? does not come ??? does not come ??? and here in this other case, we were The reason is It is because of this: ??? before Him." or, perhaps, he does not have He said to him: ??? Raba said to him the son of Is this not we were Rav Aviya elder ??? to us Master, ??? Rabbah he He said to him I the day (Song of Songs 2) ??? and ??? asked the validity who seeks The reason is Ulla said two ??? Even if ??? and sends all the day all of it tahor What is the reason מאי טעמא it is written (Lev. 11) and exalted. and we recite ??? in the case of ??? This is only in the case ??? "At the same time," We have learnt in a Mishna: they were upon it two ??? impart tumah by being carried and not ??? these are the words of R' Yishmael why is it that Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not ??? he Thus said Rabbi ??? Come and hear: give thanks Rabbi Akiva with two ??? that he was tamei why is it that Hey, isn't it the case that Is this not ??? he So, here, ??? one ??? and one ??? R' Eliezer says: Even One who married because ??? Is this not ??? he except Is this not thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one ??? and one ??? without ??? and he came R' Eliezer to say This is only in the case ??? And what does it mean when it says Even I would say This is only in the case ???

דף קכד,ב משנה

??? the dead

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.