It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

And they do not have ??? He said to him: ??? No. ??? for him For ??? for him ??? from the midst of ??? For example, ??? an elevation-offering ??? in the north and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it What then does it mean when it says ??? in the north ??? to it or perhaps, a place he that is not ??? for him Here, too, he said Rabbi Yochanan one ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? because of ??? He descended upon them ??? are not crying ??? and if ??? Behold! there are. crying ??? A deaf person a mute and a child even though ??? are not crying ??? because of in which they have It once happened And they do not have ??? And R' Yochanan said They did not teach this לא שנו except that did not have ??? of them but: ??? of them Behold! this crying ??? thus ??? for him a law established by the Torah or is a law established by the Rabbis Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he would say over thus Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said he is required Rabbi Yochanan a child he has It once happened or he (It once happened) does not have He said to him: Rabbi Ami ??? for him ??? what is the difference here, ??? that is not ??? for him For it was taught in a baraita Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? It once happened also No. ??? for him For it was taught in a baraita there is regarding them It once happened thus ??? for him a law established by the Torah or is a law established by the Rabbis ??? there is regarding them It once happened and even according to Torah law, Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? And even if According to Rabbinic law, ??? from the midst of ??? according to Torah law, he (According to Rabbinic law,) does not have he has Shmuel brought this very question ??? from where do we learn ??? it is invalid. as it is said (Lev. 1) ??? son of the morning that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of son of mornings He said to him: -- this refers to ??? She ??? from where do we learn ??? (Lev. 19) ???

דף יג,א משנה

??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars ??? and imparts tumah by being carried

דף יג,א גמרא

??? yes. prohibits benefit No. Which Tanna taught: said Rabbi Chiyya ??? Abba that R' Yochanan said that is not like Rabbi Eliezer For if it was ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Rabbi Ami he said Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? this one ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? about this teaching ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? bread a Cuthean And this is like the position wine ??? and there are those who say יש אומרים Even

דף יג,ב גמרא

his children ??? And the first tanna his wife No. ??? Mar said: ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger ??? lest ??? he Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah yes. sectarians. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? That there are I would say yes. most of some texts read: worshippers of stars ??? sectarians. derive it This is like for he said: R' Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said gentiles ??? Is this not ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry there are. except ??? Rav Yosef said son of ??? Rav Nachman said yes. sectarians. ??? for what Shall I say ??? now ??? of Israel is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? except ??? now of Israel ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? Rav said ??? son of Chama ??? from them sacrifice as it is taught: (Lev. 1) from among you and not ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? from among you among you ??? and not ??? From where can you derive Perhaps thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: from Israel ??? No. ??? but: ??? A general principle: A general principle: No. Don't let it enter your mind! as it is taught: a man Just as Scripture states: a man a man ??? some texts read: the worshipers of stars some texts read: the gentiles ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering and nedavot free-will offerings ??? and imparts tumah ??? This is obvious! immediately ??? She imparts tumah by being carried Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: -- this refers to imparts tumah by being carried and there are to you ??? that it imparts tumah even ??? and What is -- this refers to ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and like Rabbi Yehudah en Beteira that it is possible that they said Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach: -- this refers to imparts tumah by being carried and there are to you ??? that it ??? by being carried It is not imparts tumah ??? and What is -- this refers to ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry that is not like R' Yehudah en Beteira as it is taught: R' Yehudah en Beteira says from where do we learn ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry that it imparts tumah ??? as it is said (Ps. 106) ??? the dead Just as did he die become tamei ??? Even ??? in other texts idolatry imparts tumah ???

דף יג,ב משנה

??? by night and thus ??? is valid.

דף יג,ב גמרא

??? once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted We challenge that from the following baraita In reality lit: In the world ??? between by day or whether by night between on top of lit. on the head of ??? between on top of lit. on the head of a ship ??? opposite him Rav Ashi said ??? also where he teaches there i.e., in another mishna is equivalent ??? and here in this other case, is equivalent ??? Learn from this

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.