It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קלד,א גמרא

They challenged this from a baraita: in order ??? mine he gives for all a priest ??? in order ??? except ??? in order Is this not ??? They challenged this from a baraita: in order ??? mine ??? are his In this case, ??? one master reasons that in order ??? he and one master reasons that in order Is this not ??? He said to him: ??? for me My son, ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? for himself but: ??? to him ??? justice. with ??? Rav ??? he said Even if ??? to him ??? justice. with it Let us say, ??? for he said: Rav Chisda ??? and not ??? and someone else came and he ate running from this ??? running from this ??? it has of Rav Chisda Master, he does not have of Rav Chisda No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world there is for them of Rav Chisda and here in this other case, ??? the priesthood ??? reasoned ??? and one master reasons that yes. ??? there is someone who teaches this as referring about this teaching ??? in its own right Rav said: presentations the priesthood ??? Rav ??? he said presentations the priesthood yes. ???

דף קלד,א משנה

??? it was to him a cow ??? before it was even the case that ??? is exempt ??? he is liable doubt whether is exempt ??? from his fellow upon it ???

דף קלד,א גמרא

When Rav Dimi came he said Rabbi Shimon pointed out a contradition to him son of ??? to R' Yochanan We have learnt in a Mishna: doubt whether is exempt Perhaps, doubt ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? Behold! these of the master of the house that are after ??? of the master of the house Rabbi Meir says: The entirety ??? He said to him: to ??? an individual I he learns Mishna it as it is taught: R' Yehudah son of The reward says It is because of this: Rabbi Meir doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? He said to him: to ??? it except ??? son of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The reason is he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for he said: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? What then does it mean that it is written (Ps. 82) Responded ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Ex. 23) ??? No. ??? except Righteousness ??? and give to him Rabba said: Here in this case, a cow of a presumption that ??? of a presumption that ??? Abaye said to him: Consider this case: ??? she was made before it was even the case that ??? is exempt from ??? he is liable doubt whether he is liable He said to him: doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? for he said: Rav Chisda and thus It was taught by R' Chiyya ??? four ??? and four ??? sacrifice his wife ??? livestock that is tamei ??? livestock that is tahor ???

דף קלד,ב גמרא

??? and redemption ??? and redemption he exempted a donkey ??? For he came ??? he said ??? Levi pointed out a contradition to him seed ??? and not are they, ??? he came in front of Rav ??? He said to him: (Lev. 19) ??? and not ??? and not ??? They challenged him from this teaching: yes. bring in terumah No. ??? to city and not ??? and if there is not there a priest ??? a cow ??? because of ??? terumah that I terumah ??? and not ??? that is not ??? to it Consider this case: presentations that is not ??? and it was taught: a place where they are accustomed ??? No. ??? ??? ??? No. ??? ??? and if there is not there a priest elevate those particular with its monetary value? ??? because of ??? a priest that I presentations the priesthood ??? of him. Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: terumah also ??? of him. So rather, ??? why do I have to account for that which was taught ??? ??? One who arose early ??? he is liable ??? but exempt him from ??? This certain individual ??? who has arrived to the house of study ??? Rabbi Ami took possession of them And how does he act? thus Hey, isn't it the case that it is written and gave and not ??? Rabbi Ami also ??? took possession of them And if you wish, I would say a person ??? that I as it is taught: (Lev. 21) ??? an adult male ??? that it should be The greatness ??? in wisdom ??? others say from where do we learn ??? he (??? ) does not have the priests. ??? that specific Therefore, scripture states: ??? an adult male ??? is from that which is belonging to ???

דף קלד,ב משנה

Who is ??? from the section of ??? until ??? of a hand This is only in the case of a Nazir and opposite him ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? from the section of ??? until ??? of a foot If it was ??? from the section of ??? until ??? of ???

דף קלד,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Deut. 18) ??? this ??? You say this ??? Or perhaps, except ??? Scripture states: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Like that which was said by Raba ??? Here in this case, also, ??? for what he came ??? wool that are of the head. ??? and the gate ??? for what he came ??? milk for upon regarding ??? and milk ??? for he said: R' Yehoshua priests ??? in it well proper ??? The reason is ??? this one No. ??? that are his he ??? they would say ??? opposite ??? And thus it says (Num. 25) ??? in his hand ??? opposite prayer And thus it says (Ps. 106) and he stood ??? and he prayed" ??? And thus it says (Num. 25) and the his wife to ??? and it was taught ??? to it from here (Lev. 7) ??? yes. for me except ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 7) terumah ??? Those who are ill from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? Who is ??? from the section of ??? and until ??? of ??? For it was taught: ??? the house of ??? There is no difficulty. this one rabbis Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbi ??? son of ??? as it is taught: ??? is invalid ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? on ??? that it is valid If you wish, I would say this one Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis And what does it mean when it says ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.