It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קלו,א גמרא

a way ??? from ??? tithe even though As it is written tithe ??? yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? except tithe ??? for what he came ??? presentations even though ??? the Merciful One and gave that it is possible to say he learns it ??? from the head of ??? Just as there ??? No. Even here, ??? it is not written: the Merciful One (Deut. 18) ??? except The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: ??? from the head of ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? yes. So, here, ??? why do I have ??? for he said: Raba justice. with ??? even though As it is written (Deut. 26) ??? applied to you yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One (in Numbers 18) ??? all who ??? except ??? why do I have ??? fringes, even though ??? the Merciful One (Deut. 22) ??? applied to you yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One (Num. 15) on ??? So rather, ??? why do I have ??? Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah ??? from ??? all thirty day ??? even though ??? the Merciful One (Deut. 22) ??? applied to you yes. ??? it is not written: the Merciful One (Deut. 22) For ??? from him except ??? for what he came ??? houses ??? and houses ??? Rav said ??? son of Abaye ??? as it is taught: ??? and R' ??? What is the reason? For R' ??? As it is written (Deut. 15) ??? Hey, isn't it the case that it is written (Deut. 12) ??? Israel Rav said ??? as it is taught: ??? and R' ??? exempts What is the reason? he learns it ??? from the head of ??? Just as there ??? No. Even here, ??? No. And if it enters your mind to argue that from terumah ??? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? except Learn from this from terumah also exempts If it was Just as terumah in the land." yes. "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel No. Even presentations in the land." yes. "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel did not say Rabbi Yosei ??? yes. For it was taught: Rabbi ??? says presentations yes. We were accustomed except in the land." and thus he was Rabbi ??? says ??? yes. accustomed except in the land." What is the reason? For R' ??? Rabba said: he learns it ??? Just as terumah in the land." yes. "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel No. Even ??? in the land." yes. "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel did not say to him Abaye If it was Just as terumah ??? Even ??? He said to him Scripture states: (Deut. 18) ??? to him yes. to you in it except ??? If it was Just as terumah are obligated upon it death plus a fifth Even ??? are obligated upon it death plus a fifth Scripture states: (Lev. 22) and they died? in it ??? upon it upon it and not on ??? in it and not creation ??? If it was Just as terumah ??? and a second person ??? Even ??? and a second person ??? Scripture states: ??? yes. to you in it except ??? only. If it was Just as terumah ??? on one who sleeps No. Even ??? on one who sleeps No. yes. For it was taught: they were to him two ??? two and three two yes. ??? this one ??? For it was taught: yes. ??? except Learn from this this one For R' ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is a law established by the Rabbis If it was Just as terumah greatness ??? he is liable greatness ??? is exempt Even ??? also greatness ??? he is liable ??? is exempt and regarding terumah From where do we derive this? as it is taught: Israel ??? field in Syria ??? before it was even the case that ??? he is liable ??? Rabbi Akiva he is obligated ??? and the sages ??? And if you say Here, too, For it was taught in a mishna: the one who purchased ??? of ??? is exempt from the head of ??? this one ??? he is liable ???

דף קלו,ב גמרא

that is not ??? If it was Just as terumah ??? on that is not ??? No. Even ??? on that is not ??? No. and regarding terumah From where do we derive this? as it is taught: they were to him two varieties of figs ??? and thus two varieties of ??? yes. ??? and than twenty from this on this R' Isaac says It is because of this: R' ??? the academy of Shammai say yes. ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? Even ??? on that is not ??? No. yes. For it was taught in a mishna: they were to him two heretics, ??? to him ??? but not ??? this he gives for himself and this he gives for himself Except I can object with text from here: at the end of the teaching, where he teaches ??? but not ??? this he gives for himself and this he gives for himself Here, too, It is because of this: ??? varieties of ??? except ??? that is good Come and learn from this. ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also, ??? that is good Come and learn from this. ??? them ??? this one ??? that is not ??? If it was Just as terumah in the case of ??? Even ??? yes. For it was taught in a mishna: One who says all ??? terumah and all ??? did not say anything this one all ??? his words ??? And another teaching did not say anything except Is this not Learn from this this one Rabbi ??? Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis Learn from this Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said ??? the World: ??? three old men ??? creation ??? as it is taught: Rabbi ??? says ??? is not customary except in the land." and like R' Yehudah son of ??? in words of Torah as it is taught: R' Yehudah son of ??? says yes. these are the words of Torah ??? as it is taught: Rabbi ??? says In reality lit: In the world He is not liable until ??? by the arm of ??? ??? ??? creation ??? Just as that do not thus ??? Ravina said So, with whom does it agree? R' Shimon She as it is taught: R' Shimon exempts ??? from the head of ??? What is the reason? For R' Shimon he learns it ??? Just as presentations ??? No. Even ??? also ??? No. and if he learns it ??? Just as terumah in the land." yes. in areas outside the Land of Israel No. Even ??? also in the land." yes. in areas outside the Land of Israel No. Why is it that We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? accustomed in the land." and "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel except we were The reason is ??? Just as tithe ??? No. Even ??? No. and there in that case From where do we derive this? As it is written (Lev. 26) all who under passes over ??? creates an exclusion ??? that is not ??? Just as first-born Even if ??? Even ??? Even if ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? a person ??? before ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? were given before a priest

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.