It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קלח,א גמרא

??? It was taught by a Tanna taught: a maneh worth one hundred dinars son of forty ??? yes. For it was taught in a mishna: ??? despite the fact ??? pomegranates that is tahor ??? pomegranates Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says ??? of two One ??? son of forty ??? and how much time is the duration of he gives to him ??? a Tanna taught: No. ??? to him except ??? a priest and he stood on ??? so that to do ??? words he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi said he read (Deut. 12) to stand ??? a thing that he was ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? I would say ??? is greater than No. ??? and so go ahead and say had a vaulted root of wool as it is taught: had a vaulted root of wool it was ??? on top of lit. on the head of the high priest upon it ??? to establish Just as as it is said (Ex. 28) ??? that specific on a thread" ??? Scripture states: he and his children a thing ??? and to his children ??? also No. ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? of ??? No. ??? of a priest ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except for one for he said: ??? of a priest ??? What is there to say? in that place ??? No. ??? it was said: ??? the first Rav Chisda he said he is liable R' he gave son of ??? he said is exempt Rav Chisda he said he is liable for it is the case that ??? R' he gave son of ??? he said is exempt to inform lit: to witness that he came fill ??? in the case of ??? there is not in this case. We have learnt in a Mishna: the one who purchased ??? of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile is exempt from the head of ??? this one ??? he is liable why is it that Each and every one according to ??? to it ??? Rav Chisda who follow the reasoning ??? For R' he gave son of ??? For example, ??? to him all thirty ??? the one who purchased ??? of his fellow ??? Which Tanna taught: ??? That there are ??? regarding sell according to sell do we go? R' Chisda said it is Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita ??? tree in the midst of ??? he gives ??? for all one and one Rabbi Yehuda said when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that did not have ??? the master of the field but: ??? the master of the field he gives ??? on The entirety He said to him: Raba Hey, isn't it the case that Master, he for he said: This is only in the case ??? the master of the field ??? And if you say Here in this case, also, This is only in the case ??? This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna (Lev. 19) ??? ??? it is written ??? that he had begun ??? field except Here in this case, ??? that he had begun ??? No. ??? except Rabba said: This a Tanna taught: he For it was taught in a baraita He said to him: ??? for me My son, ??? of a cow -- this refers to and it was the case that of them presentations ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? to him from ??? from him ??? to him from ???

דף קלח,ב גמרא

Perhaps, presentations ??? No. ??? Here in this case, also, presentations ??? No. ??? Therefore, ??? sell he is liable for he said: for him the purchaser gifts ??? She No. ??? the purchaser he is liable for he said: for him sell gifts ??? No. ??? to you

דף קלח,ב משנה

??? accustomed in the land." and in areas outside the Land of Israel before the house or in the case that one is not before the house ??? but not ??? the blood ??? the blood accustomed ??? is not customary except ??? and is not customary except ??? Who is that is not ??? For example, ??? but: if ??? in the house of and thus ??? is exempt ??? "uf" tamei is exempt ??? "uf" tamei ??? on ??? "uf" tahor and tahor ??? on ??? "uf" tamei is exempt ??? reads male, Rabbi Eliezer he is obligated and the sages ???

דף קלח,ב גמרא

Rabbi Avin: and R' ??? One says all in a case For it was taught in a baraita in the land." and in areas outside the Land of Israel that did not have ??? from the head of ??? To exclude ??? for he said: ??? is not customary except in the land." and one says all in a case For it was taught in a baraita before the house or in the case that one is not before the house that did not have ??? and his son You might have thought that I would say that Because ??? it is written at a time i.e., in a case That there are holy offerings ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? holy offerings No. ??? Come and learn from this. both of them. They said: all in a case For it was taught in a baraita ??? This is obvious! It is because of this: ??? for him prohibits ??? of him Is this not ??? holy offerings What is the reason? ??? Is this not It is because of this: ??? to us No. Let the Tanna teach: from the beginning also No. ??? to you ??? a Tanna taught: also that did not have ??? but not ??? why is it that No. For scripture said: (Deut. 22) ??? ??? that you ??? he has fulfilled his obligation this ??? you ??? except ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Ravina said Therefore, "uf" tahor ??? ??? is exempt ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא For scripture said: ??? ??? that you ??? he has fulfilled his obligation this ??? you ??? except ??? to the court bet din How so? If it was ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.