It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

all lamps of ??? except for the lamp ??? in it ??? Sabbath and Perhaps It is different there in that case ??? for him ??? except Rav Ashi said Rabbi Yehudah ??? She For it was taught in a baraita ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yehudah says in error shall eat at the conclusion of the Sabbath with intent does not eat ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? says in error shall eat ??? Sabbath to others and not to him with intent does not eat ??? No. to him and not to others ??? with intent and Rabbi Meir No. You might have thought where he teaches is equivalent ??? Just as Yom Kippur there is no difference in error and there is no difference with intent No. ??? So, too, here in this case, also, there is no difference in error and there is no difference with intent No. ??? and who seeks ??? to it in error And Rabbi Yehudah Hey, isn't it the case that even though ??? The tanna teaches: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: despite the fact ??? make him forfeit his soul he Here in this case, ??? is valid ??? like Rabbi Yochanan ??? for he said: there is no difference in error and there is no difference with intent No. ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? at the conclusion of the Sabbath to others and not to him a Tanna taught: ??? is valid The tanna teaches: there is no difference to him and there is no difference to others It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat ??? for him Rav What is the reason? ??? for him Shall I say It is because of this: ??? for him like Rabbi Yehudah and it was taught It was taught by like Rabbi ??? It is because of this: ??? for him like Rabbi Yehudah The one who teaches like Rabbi ??? for him And furthermore, who derive it like Rabbi Yehudah For didn't Rav say ??? son of Ami For my teacher. them Rav ??? my teacher. them ??? And so he expounds. ??? he expounds. like Rabbi Yehudah It is because of this: with me" the land And if you say a Tanna taught: ??? a Tanna taught: in front because the whole world a Tanna ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said a Tanna taught: ??? a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? on Shabbat in error shall eat with intent does not eat He said to him: What then does it mean when it says ??? like Rabbi ??? Up to this point, No. ??? Rabbi Meir except ??? but: ??? No. Hey, isn't it the case that Our mishna ??? he Rav Huna said ??? Chiyya son of Rav in the name of Rav forbidden in cases regarding eating ??? to say it is Rabbi Yehudah this one is Rabbi Meir Sarai For Sarai Rabbi Meir

דף טו,ב גמרא

For example, that he was to him an ill person while it is still day If so, What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah ??? For example, that he was to him an ill person ??? and This is like for he said: Rav Acha son of ??? Rav said And there are those who say it was Rabbi Yitzchak said son of ??? Rav said ??? on Shabbat is forbidden ??? on Shabbat is permitted. ??? What is the reason? This ??? and that one he does not ??? Rav Pappa said: occasions ??? is permitted. For example, that he was to him an ill person while it is still day ??? is forbidden For example, ??? to him ??? Rav said ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? on Shabbat is permitted. ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא immediately For if it was ??? meat without ??? For ??? with the intent ??? on Shabbat is forbidden ??? lest ???

דף טו,ב משנה

??? a hand ??? and of one who bought ??? is valid The entirety ??? And really ??? and with all ??? except ??? because of ???

דף טו,ב גמרא

??? once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted This is satisfactory ??? a hand Perhaps will come ??? side except rock and he bought initially No. We challenge that from the following baraita in all ??? between ??? between ??? between ??? of he bought There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, that is connected for he said: Rav Kahana ??? that is connected to the earth Rabbi invalidates it and R' Chiyya considers it proper Up to this point, No. ??? considers it proper Rabbi Chiyya except ??? but: initially No. in what way have you established that it is like Rabbi Chiyya once it has been done Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: in all ??? between ??? between that is connected between ??? is more ??? livestock to the bottom between ??? to the bottom ??? livestock is more with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi and not R' Chiyya If it was R' Chiyya once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted If it was Rabbi in the case where it has already been done, also, it is not valid. In reality lit: In the world Rabbi Chiyya and even initially and that one ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi So rather, Our mishna where he teaches ??? once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi and not Rabbi Chiyya If it was Rabbi Chiyya even initially If it was Rabbi in the case where it has already been done, also, it is not valid. In reality lit: In the world Rabbi Chiyya and even initially Our mishna where he teaches ??? Rabbi She it is a problem of Rabbi ??? There is no difficulty. here, that is connected ??? here, ??? and in the end ??? to us between ??? and in the end ??? as it is taught: ??? is valid that is connected to the earth ??? is valid ??? in a wall ??? of it ??? is valid he was rock he would exit from the wall or he bought an elevation-offering upon it. ??? in it ??? is invalid

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.