It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כד,א גמרא

Scripture states: ??? yes. ??? No. and all in a case As it is written of him. ??? No. ??? is a kal vachomer Hey, isn't it the case that regarding Yom Kippur As it is written of him. ??? and it was taught: (Lev. 9) ??? A sin-offering ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as in a place that did not have and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use the Name a place ??? is it not logical ??? the Name Scripture states: ??? A sin-offering ??? makes A sin-offering And there is no meaning to the word the Name makes A sin-offering The reason is ??? the Merciful One ??? A sin-offering this one Is this not thus ??? is a kal vachomer ??? the Merciful One regarding wagon ??? this ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? and shall be wagon is valid ??? From a "kal vachomer", for just as a cow that did not have ??? is valid ??? wagon ??? is it not logical ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 21) ??? the wagon ??? yes. ??? No.

דף כד,א משנה

is valid ??? is invalid, ??? is valid ??? is invalid, ???

דף כד,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught priests ??? with the passage of the requisite number of years are proper ??? are proper with the passage of the requisite number of years ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found is valid ??? is invalid, ??? is valid ??? is invalid, ??? From where do we learn this? ??? (Num. 8) this who ??? Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said (Num. 8) ??? year" ??? we have learned ??? invalidate it at them." It is possible ??? invalidate it at them." It would be a logical inference for just as priests that do not ??? invalidate it of them ??? invalidate it of them ??? invalidate it at them." is it not logical ??? invalidate it at them." Scripture states: this who ??? this ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? It is possible ??? the priests. ??? with the passage of the requisite number of years Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as ??? that do not ??? invalidate it at them." two invalidate it at them." priests ??? invalidate it at them." is it not logical ??? two invalidate it at them." Scripture states: who ??? and not who to the priests It is possible Even ??? in the house of ??? thus Scripture states: (Num. 4) ??? the blessing of the Service ??? No. Watch out for leading vav And I said except at a time i.e., in a case ??? It is written one says (Num. 8) ??? and twenty year" ??? and It is written one says (Num. 4) ??? thirty it would be impossible to say thirty immediately it is said ??? and it would be impossible to say ??? immediately it is said thirty How so? ??? to learn and thirty ??? from here ??? that did not have he saw a sign of proper ??? Hashem two for the remainder he does not one who sees R' Yosei says three two as it is said (Dan. 1) ??? two three ??? And the other one that I ??? And the other one that I ??? the blessing of the Service ??? The Rabbis taught a priest ??? two ??? until ??? is valid ??? invalidate it in it son of Levi ??? thirty and until son of ??? is valid ??? and two invalidate it in it In what matters are we saying this? ??? festival ??? but: ??? in the house of ??? yes. ??? except to the voice of R' Yosi said What then does it mean when it says he read

דף כד,ב גמרא

(II Chron. 5) And it was ??? the voice of ??? until ??? up to how much he said Rabbi ??? R' Chanina said until ??? It was taught there: One who has had a seminal emission ??? and not ??? water ??? tamei R' Yosei says ??? tamei ??? tahor ??? up to how much he said Rabbi ??? he said Rabbi ??? all ??? on ??? One ??? And they said about Rabbi ??? that he was son of ??? year" He was standing on ??? One ??? he said Rabbi ??? and oil ??? Ami ??? there are. they stand for me In an hour of ??? The Rabbis taught ??? his beard ??? to do ??? and to descend before the ark to lead the prayers ??? ??? From when is valid ??? two ??? Rabbi says says I until that it should be son of twenty R' Chisda said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi As it is written (Ezra 3) ??? twenty year" ??? on ??? the house of Hashem And the other one ??? that I Hey, isn't it the case that This he read ??? it is written It is like that which was said by Rabbi Joshua son of Levi for he said: Rabbi Yehoshua son of Levi ??? and four ??? priests ??? and this is one of them (Ezek. 44) the priests. ??? My son, ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 21) a man ??? from here Rabbi Eliezer said a child is invalid, ??? And even if perfect From when is valid ??? two ??? but: ??? the priests. yes. ??? that specific ??? until that it should be son of twenty that it is possible that they said this one Rabbi She And even if is invalid, is a law established by the Rabbis he does not have and there are that they said Rabbi it has is invalid, According to Rabbinic law, Hey, isn't it the case that It is the rabbis' position and it refers to a case where it was done a priori that is not but: once it has been done ??? is valid.

דף כד,ב משנה

tahor in a vessel A deaf person tamei in all the vessels tahor in all the vessels tamei in a vessel A deaf person

דף כד,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? implements of A deaf person tamei ??? tahor ??? all the vessels tahor ??? tamei Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found tahor in a vessel A deaf person tamei in all the vessels tahor in all the vessels tamei in a vessel A deaf person ??? words ??? And even though that did not have ??? You say despite the fact that did not have ??? Or perhaps, But rather, if so, ??? Rabbi ??? son of ??? says it is said (Lev. 11) ??? and it is said ??? Just as ??? is said ??? despite the fact that did not have ??? Even ??? is said ??? despite the fact that did not have ??? and there in that case From where do we derive this? he said Rabbi ??? the Torah ??? on implements of pottery

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.