It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א גמרא

Is this not ??? that he came he is required for him ??? No. ??? that he came he is required for him ??? Come and hear: ??? renders clothing tamei when worn by one who swallows the meat of such an invalid sacrifice And if you say yes. ??? from the Torah ??? also and so when ??? for him ??? to it ??? to it ??? to taharah, something ??? he for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: ??? says Just as Scripture states: (Deut. 12) ??? as it was shall eat ??? etc. And so Just as we have learned ??? and a ram From here, Behold! this came to teach and it is found teach There is an analogy between a deer and a ram ??? Just as invalid as regarding ??? Even a deer and a ram ??? and "uf" he (??? ) does not have in words of Torah except in words of ??? Which Tanna taught: ??? upon it of Rabbi ??? Rabbi She as it is taught: Rabbi says (Deut. 12) ??? as it was ??? This teaches ??? Moses on ??? and on ??? and on most of one ??? and on most of two ??? one ??? it was said: ??? he said or ??? or he bought Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said ??? and not he bought ??? he said or ??? or he bought one The tanna teaches: one all ??? Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? he said ??? and not he bought What then does it mean when it says one ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? ??? and after this ??? is valid ??? and after this ??? ??? is invalid ??? ??? and he does not know if before ??? if after ??? this was an occurrance And they said all doubt whether ??? is invalid And even ??? No. The tanna teaches: It is because of this: ??? Come and hear: ??? two ??? signs ??? is invalid and it is not necessary to say ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? until ??? ??? and ??? It is because of this: ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? Come and hear: ??? so that ??? is valid Is this not ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? No. ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? All of it Come and hear: Behold! that he was ??? he bought ??? upon it Any thing that was ??? is valid Is this not ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? No. ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Come and hear: How so? ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? without most of meat until ??? or ??? they come ??? or ??? a sign of one and most of meat with it the case is that of an elevation-offering, two or most of two ??? of Rav ??? son of love ??? What then do we do about it? What then do we do about it? ??? Perhaps It is different there in that case That there are ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear: ??? son of ??? among Raba he came For ??? the blood Rabba said: in what way does ???

דף כח,ב גמרא

??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Perhaps in a place ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Rabbah say ??? he (examination) does not have ??? except ??? He said to him: Rav Yosef the son of ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Rabba said: ??? Joseph ??? Yochanan Perhaps, one for he says or This or ??? R' Yehuda says: until ??? Rav Chisdah said No. R' Yehudah said: except ??? Because ??? all of it ??? but: livestock immediately ??? It is not necessary This comes to imply ??? of Rabbi Yehudah It is because of this: blood he For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Yehudah says until ??? ??? I would say until ??? ??? And what does it mean when it says until ??? until ??? in the hour of ??? Come and hear: ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah I would say ??? It is necessary for him ??? in the hour of ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Come and hear: They said to him: to Rabbi Yehudah based on this lit: from after, that did not have ??? except to discharge the mitzvah from them blood What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from that did not have ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rabbi Yehudah reasoned ??? thus ??? to it What do I have to learn from ??? in the hour of ??? What do I have to learn from ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? This is only in the case reasoned in the hour of ??? will come blood ??? that did not have in the hour of ??? No. will come blood ??? he is required R' ??? to Rabbi Yehudah ??? of them ??? of them What then? He said to him This certain individual elder Thus said Rabbi Eliezer And there are those who say it was He said to him: This certain individual elder to Rabbi ??? Thus said Rabbi Yochanan ??? there are. are proper This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav Chisda ??? two ??? signs ??? is invalid, and it is not necessary to say ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? until ??? ??? and ??? one ??? was it said; Rav said: half and half ??? Rav Kahana he said half and half he does not ??? Rav said: half and half ??? Thus said for him the Merciful One to Moses No. ??? Rav Kahana he said half and half he does not ??? Thus said for him the Merciful One to Moses ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? one ??? and one ??? is invalid If you say, half and half ??? why is it that is invalid, this one a slave for him most of According to Rabbinic law, Perhaps No. will come ??? a fraction Thus said Rabbi ??? Come and hear: ??? that two there are. they agree both ??? on account of where it is not possible ??? this one ??? why is it that ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? Here in this case, that it is possible ??? Rav Pappa said: two ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? there is not in this case. Come and hear: ??? of it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.