It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כט,א גמרא

so that ??? is valid And if you say half and half ??? to it Who deduces ??? No. ??? your soul If it was half and half ??? this one does he act? for him ??? If it was half and half he does not ??? No. a slave and not anything Come and hear: Behold! that he was ??? he bought ??? upon it Any thing that was ??? is valid And if you say half and half ??? Rabba said: that I in the matter of ??? most of ??? He said to him Abaye and not all ??? he for just as ??? in a case ??? in the case of most of ??? that until That there are ??? No. ??? not all the more so? ??? most of ??? except everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world half and half he does not ??? And so it was said: of Rav and of Rav ??? in the matter of Passover was it said; Behold! that were Israel ??? Rav said: half and half ??? and Rav Kahana he said half and half he does not ??? and there in that case What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav As it is written (Num. 9) a man a man For it shall be tamei ??? a man ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? most of one ??? one ??? the majority of his body of one ??? Rav said ??? one ??? and one ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was ??? Those who are ill there i.e., in another mishna he ??? for him ??? It is because of this: ??? he It is necessary for him but: holy offerings ??? he It is necessary for him I would say No. ??? for him ??? until That there are completely and if ??? holy offerings It is because of this: ??? he It is necessary for him but: Those who are ill ??? It is not necessary I would say In the midpoint of ??? for him Come and learn from this. Which ??? and which ??? Rav said ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? From where can you derive When the baraita teaches ??? and if You might have thought But the beginning of the teaching, ??? should bring himself Rather, what can we conclude? at the end of the teaching, ??? is valid ??? is valid should bring himself this one There is no difficulty לא קשיא ??? a Tanna taught: also ??? is valid except But the beginning of the teaching, ??? on "uf" he arises Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? should bring himself Rav ??? son of ??? he said But the beginning of the teaching, ??? from here where he teaches one ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. An elevation-offering of a bird: who seeks two ??? Rather, what can we conclude? at the end of the teaching, ??? most of one ??? Watch out for leading vav And this is present here. An elevation-offering of a bird: who seeks two signs What then does it mean when it says most of one most of Each and every one In justice, he ??? most of two immediately That there are A sin-offering ??? for him it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a sign of and because of this he the Tanna does not distinguish. Rav Papa said, But the beginning of the teaching, ??? from here where he teaches Rabbi Yehudah says until ??? ??? rabbis upon it If you say, This is satisfactory ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, ??? why is it that ??? rabbis upon it should it itself ??? he It is necessary for him Rav Ashi said: at the end of the teaching, ??? from here where he teaches ??? two ??? is valid ??? once it has been done, yes, it is valid post facto, but initially, it is not permitted If you say, This is satisfactory ??? we were ??? No. It is because of this: For Rav learned: Joseph ??? that it should not be two ??? zevach-offering one (Lev. 19) ??? that it should not be one ??? two offerings? And Rav says ??? it is written except If you say, ??? even in the case where he did it initially, also, And even ??? reasoned But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, ??? for Resh Lakish said: based on this lit: from after, that we have learned the majority of his body of one ??? For what reason We learned: most of one ??? and most of two ??? on account of that which we learned They brought to him ??? after ??? on ??? It is possible No. ??? is invalid, Therefore, we learned: most of one ??? and most of two ??? Mar said: It is possible No. ??? is invalid,

דף כט,ב גמרא

If so, ??? for him the blessing of the Service ??? and it was taught: all ??? Yom Kippur. are not ??? except in it This is what he means: It is possible ??? is invalid, According to Rabbinic law, ??? I thought to say that it is possible is invalid, According to Rabbinic law, Therefore, we learned: most of one ??? and most of two ??? and based on this lit: from after, that even ??? is a law established by the Rabbis there is not in this case. why do I have ??? a commandment ??? Reish Lakish said It is because of this: Levi elder It is not ??? except in the rear of And Rabbi Yochanan said: that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of Rabba said: Everyone acknowledges in a case ??? a sign of one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and the sign one Israel that it is invalid for behold! was it made? of it It once happened ??? in the hand of some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? also in a case ??? a sign of one to the bottom and the sign one is more is invalid for behold! One who acts of it It once happened A sin-offering of a bird: to the bottom No. ??? except For example, ??? a sign of one outside and the sign one inside for one for he said: that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of ??? It is not ??? except in the rear of No. ??? He said to him Rabbah son of ??? Master, did not say thus ??? Rav Yosef in a case ??? a sign of one outside and the sign one inside also is invalid, for behold! One who acts of it It once happened A sin-offering of a bird: outside No. ??? except For example, ??? signs outside ??? inside ??? that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of ??? It is not ??? except in the rear of No. ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Zeira all ??? from the beginning and until the end of impart tumah garments and invalidate it it ??? of it is invalid, ??? between before is invalid between after is invalid It is not imparts tumah garments ??? before is invalid imparts tumah garments after is invalid It is not imparts tumah garments And if you say that is old ??? from the beginning and until the end of ??? also ??? of it is invalid, ??? before is invalid imparts tumah garments after is invalid It is not imparts tumah garments Rabba said: ??? It is different there in that case ??? a saying at the end of eating, before they leave ??? She A general principle: Rabba said: If it was it is a problem for me this one it is a problem for me ??? It is not ??? except in the rear of ??? For example, ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two men ??? that came first No. imparts tumah and a person that was last imparts tumah Rav Yosef said two men it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? son of of him ??? (Deut. 12) ??? that it shall not be two ??? zevach-offering one (Lev. 19) ??? that it should not be one ??? two offerings? And Rav says ??? it is written He said to him Abaye Was it not said about it Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: these are the words of Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.