It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לג,א גמרא

who ??? One sign i.e., one of the two parts of the neck that need to be sliced in the same gesture ??? two to taharah, something ??? or No. Up to this point, No. ??? to us except to taharah, something ??? but: in cases regarding eating forbidden He said to him Rav Acha son of Rav ??? Perhaps In reality lit: In the world No. he returns of him. and R' Zeira ??? of Raba he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him No. he reasons for himself. Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov Learn from this ??? Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) they invite Israel on My son, ??? And there is no meaning to the word they invite some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: a gentile on My son, ??? What is the reason? Israel ??? hangs the validity immediately That there are ??? that is elevated i.e., important ??? them some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles ??? them ??? hangs the validity Behold! ??? from ??? Rav Pappa said: it was. ??? in front of Rav Acha. son of Ya'akov he is required ??? for him who that it is possible something ??? Sarai ??? is forbidden and they do not say for him ??? this one The reason is he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: It was taught: that is not ??? son of Ya'akov One who wishes to eat ??? before ??? an olive's volume meat from the house of ??? proper proper ??? proper proper ??? to it until ??? one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and one Israel are permitted in it That would be a support to him. To whose position? for Rav, Idi bar Avin for he said: Rav Idi bar Avin he said R' Isaac son of Ashian, One who wishes ??? an olive's volume meat from the house of Its slaughter of livestock ??? proper proper ??? proper proper ??? to it until ??? one some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and one Israel are permitted therein.

דף לג,א משנה

??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" He has not fulfilled his obligation. from them blood are proper and they are eaten ??? on account of that did not have ??? with blood R' Shimon says ???

דף לג,א גמרא

The reason is that is not he has fulfilled his obligation from them blood this one he has fulfilled his obligation from them blood yes. ??? why is it that ??? there are. And there is no meaning to the word two makes the third ??? And from where do you derive ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) where he teaches raw lit., living For this holy offerings raw lit., living ??? who that it is possible And, too, If it was ??? For He has not fulfilled his obligation. from them blood is valid should it itself ??? he It is necessary for him And, too, If it was ??? For he has fulfilled his obligation from them blood who considers it proper For didn't R' Chiyya bar Abba say Rabbi Yochanan said: from where do we learn ??? holy offerings that is not considers it proper as it is said (Deut. 12) on the land ??? blood ??? considers it proper that is not ??? he does not considers it proper And, too, If it was ??? For He has not fulfilled his obligation. from them blood No. ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Here in this case, ??? By means of money tithe is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that is not like Rabbi Meir For it was taught in a baraita

דף לג,ב גמרא

all ??? water in words of ??? he causes the holy things to become tamei and he causes the terumah to become invalid. and it is permitted ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. and the sages ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? son of ??? From where can you derive Perhaps Up to this point, does not disagree rabbis upon it of Rabbi ??? except ??? tithe but: ??? and food ??? does not disagree Hey, isn't it the case that ??? She When the baraita teaches they are eaten ??? Are we are not dealing that he came ??? for him ??? except Rav Pappa said: Here in this case, ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) and Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer She as it is taught: yes. ??? Rabbi Shimon ben Eliezer says It is because of this: Rabbi Meir ??? yes. ??? No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? Even ??? yes. ??? No. and who that it is possible ??? yes. as it is taught: He brought in his hands ??? his hands ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva But the sages say: his hands ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world ??? in part No. her name ??? and here in this other case, ??? his hands because ??? one master reasons that his hands ??? The rabbis established and one master reasons that ??? of the world The rabbis established ??? like Rabbi ??? for he said: his hands ??? there shall be Perhaps and thus he comes to say Rabbi Akiva What case is he dealing with? from terumah and holy offerings ??? but: ??? there shall be ??? also ??? for it is the case that ??? for him Rabbi Akivah for he said: two makes the third ??? For it was taught in a baraita on that very day ??? Rabbi Akiva (Lev. 11) and all implements of A deaf person etc. ??? tamei It is not said except ??? others ??? on a loaf two that he was makes the third ??? Perhaps What case is he dealing with? ??? a law established by the Torah but: ??? did not say ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? Here in this case, ??? on ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) that is not like Rabbi Joshua as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says: One who eats he eats ??? two two the third the third Rabbi Yehoshua says: One who eats he eats ??? and a second person two the third two ??? And there is no meaning to the word two ??? on ??? terumah on ??? terumah yes. on ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use No. his reasoning is Those who are ill ??? on ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? in them? the third ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.