It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לח,א גמרא

??? Behold! this ??? He said to them ??? for him ??? for I say all that is not items ??? makes What then does it mean when it says ??? items ??? makes Rav said ??? To me ??? for me of him ??? Shmuel it was ??? a thing ??? makes ??? items that do not ??? makes And what can we come and learn from this? ??? livestock that are small ??? and not He returned it is invalid that is not except ??? this one He returned it is valid If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? to it but: ??? No. Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: R' Yosei says he was Rabbi Meir says: ??? in the hour of ??? yes. this ??? the son of Rabbi Yosi says in his name even ??? yes. this ??? it is a problem ??? it is a problem ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? lightweight this one ??? lightweight ??? also There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? where they said in the rear of ??? What then does it mean when it says in the rear of ??? in the midst of ??? To exclude the beginning of ??? that is not Rav Chisdah said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita livestock that are small ??? and not He returned it is invalid begins ??? Shall I say in the rear of ??? Any time ??? except Is this not in the midst of ??? Raba said to him In reality lit: In the world in the rear of ??? for I say all that is not makes thus in the rear of ??? in his knowledge ??? before ??? son of Isaac he said ??? where they said ??? he said ??? son of Isaac ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita he said Rabbi Shimon ??? by night tomorrow he found ??? blood is valid ??? and Shmuel said ??? the house of ??? We learned: If you say, This is satisfactory ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, in the rear of ??? Perhaps ??? and Perhaps that I ??? and who is preferable For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Eliezer says ??? if ??? and is preferable According to Rabbinic law, Ravina said He said to me: ??? son of ??? of it Avuah a thing ??? And there are those who say it was the brother a thing ??? and According to Rabbinic law, who is preferable Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: But the sages say: until ??? or in the hand of or ??? rabbis ??? Shall I say ??? immediately ??? should bring himself except This is obvious! ??? and if is preferable What then does it mean when it says until Rava said: ??? where they said in the rear of ??? Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: (Lev. 22) ox

דף לח,ב גמרא

or ??? creates an exclusion ??? or ??? creates an exclusion ??? For ??? creates an exclusion to be taken out. the wall seven days creates an exclusion ??? time under of its mother creates an exclusion ??? This ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? except ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? except This is obvious! this ??? and this ??? If you say, This is satisfactory in the case of ??? in the rear of ??? we were ??? he read ??? except If you say, No. in the case of ??? in the rear of ??? what is the purpose according to him ??? Rabba said: Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion This is like ??? livestock that are small ??? and not He returned it is invalid Regarding what matters are we speaking? in the hand of but: ??? between ??? and not ??? between ??? and not ??? is valid In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? between in the hand of between ??? between ??? and not ??? between ??? and not ??? is valid and "uf" even No. ??? except ??? and not ??? except ??? Behold! this ??? And what can we come and learn from this? all of them ??? livestock that are small ??? and not He returned it is invalid that is not except ??? a hand yes. a foot No. that are small yes. that is large No. "uf" ??? for him that is not We have learnt in a Mishna:

דף לח,ב משנה

??? is valid ??? invalidates it he said ??? even it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? from courtyard ??? of it is invalid ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile lit., a stranger some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry R' Yosi said is a kal vachomer the things for just as in a place ??? yes. The entirety walks except after ??? a place that do not ??? is it not logical that it should not be The entirety walks except after ???

דף לח,ב גמרא

Behold! ??? there is for them of Rabbi Eliezer the son of Rabbi Yosi as it is taught: R' Eliezer said the son of Rabbi Yosi I hear ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned If it was ??? yes. If it was No. No. ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry we do not say ??? reasoned even though that is not ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry say and he came Rabbi Yosei to say even though ??? this ??? and this ??? we do not say that it is possible that they said ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned For say this ??? and this ??? What case is he dealing with? inside but: outside No. except ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.