It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לט,א גמרא

No. ??? and he came Rabbi Eliezer to say ??? except ??? and he came Rabbi Yosei to say even inside also this ??? and this ??? we do not say was it said; ??? ??? to throw of its blood some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry and to offer ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said it is permitted. Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? except ??? he said it is permitted. yes. "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? and not we complete it except ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? to throw of its blood that did not have ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said is valid Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? and we complete it ??? an invalidating act nevertheless Rabbi Shimon son of ??? he said is valid yes. "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? and not we complete it ??? an invalidating act nevertheless And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated In this case, In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? It is because of this: ??? No. ??? but: ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him to Rabbi Yochanan and If it was said, ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabbi Yochanan but: In this case, I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him ??? son of ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Sheishet R' Yosi said is a kal vachomer the things for just as in a place ??? yes. The entirety walks except after ??? a place that do not ??? is it not logical that it should not be The entirety walks except after ??? What then does it mean when it says yes. ??? Shall I say that is not ??? A general principle: except ??? in what way does It concerns itself except This is obvious! ??? This is what he means: for just as in a place ??? yes. The entirety walks except after ??? a place that do not ??? except ??? the blessing of the Service is it not logical that it should not be The entirety walks except after ??? it is a problem ??? son of ??? except it is a problem to Rabbi Yochanan This is satisfactory ??? son of ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? Yochanan this one ??? Yochanan except except it is a problem to Rabbi Yochanan he ??? to it This is only in the case ??? to it in four, ??? This is what he means: for just as in a place ??? in four, ??? yes. The entirety walks except after ???

דף לט,ב גמרא

a place that do not ??? except ??? is it not logical that it should not be The entirety walks except after ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rabbi Yochanan ??? ??? to throw of its blood some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry and to offer ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Behold! these ??? the dead it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it and after this ??? upon it this was an occurrance ??? And they did not say of it No. prohibits and not permission Rav Chisdah said Watch out for leading vav And they did not say of it prohibits It is because of this: ??? Rabbinic law, not. permission It is because of this: ??? of Rabbi Eliezer From where can you derive Perhaps Up to this point, No. ??? rabbis there i.e., in another mishna except that is not ??? But here, in this case, of what I heard ??? on ??? So, too, ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna except regarding some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry but: Israel ??? on ??? we do not say except Rav said ??? Watch out for leading vav And they did not say of it permission It is because of this: ??? Which Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel Shall I say Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? who said ??? writ ??? running ??? of it And it once happened ??? who said ??? writ ??? He ascended ??? and it fell did he die he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel if ??? stillborn lit., fallen behold! This is הרי זה writ and if ??? he does not writ and we were at of it It once happened ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: if ??? on ??? behold! This is הרי זה writ And it once happened also ??? who said ??? writ ??? He ascended ??? and it fell did he die he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel if ??? stillborn lit., fallen behold! This is הרי זה writ and if ??? he does not writ and Perhaps It is different there in that case for he says ??? except Ravina said It is because of this: ??? as it is taught: the writing ??? to others they were of them slaves and he said ??? If it was ??? of them if he was his rabbi; two a priest Behold! these they eat from terumah Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says immediately who said ??? If it was ??? of them Already ??? of them ??? and we were at of it ??? even ??? Rabbah said (and there are those who say Rabbi Yochanan ??? from the beginning ??? does not disagree that is not he bought ??? and in the rear of ??? does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? to him by way of lit., through the hands of after ??? and in the end ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned ??? and that one that he came ??? he returns of him. and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned ??? on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that that is not ??? from the beginning reasoned For No. will come ??? why is it that ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi ??? he will give ??? Israel And they said them the blood ??? Rav excessive ??? son of Rav Matanah: in front of Rav Yosef For This ??? What then does it mean when it says He sent to him thus R' Yehudah said: Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi He said to him Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi ??? he will give for him ??? Israel What then does it mean when it says He said to him: ??? If it was ??? Perhaps, he that is not ??? for him is forbidden and if No. He said to him ??? a mountain

דף לט,ב משנה

??? for the sake of lit. in the name of mountains for the sake of lit. in the name of hills for the sake of lit. in the name of days for the sake of lit. in the name of rivers for the sake of lit. in the name of from the deserts ??? is invalid

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.