It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ד,א גמרא

??? of ??? one cuts off his head of one from them he gives to him he ate is permitted. to eat ??? And if not, is forbidden to eat ??? Abaye ??? Raba ??? from the end of the teaching: Abaye ??? The reason is of Israel ??? atop it but: he would exit and he has entered No. Raba ??? from the end of the teaching: The reason is ??? and they found ??? but: he would exit and he has entered it is of acceptable worth. ??? it is a problem at the end of the teaching, He could say to you he would exit and he has entered also came and they found a seminal emission for him and to Raba it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, He could say to you he would exit and he has entered also ??? atop it he is equivalent. one like it; he found in his hand ??? of ??? one cuts off his head etc. why is it that ??? Perhaps it is the case he ??? then the ruling is acceptable. Rav said ??? under ??? and Perhaps the signs that we given? it was. he will give for him ??? Rav said ??? for him ??? and Perhaps They reason ??? yes. ??? from the Torah ??? who ??? except immediately ??? in them? ??? in them? So, here, immediately ??? and not ??? that it was not the case that ??? She as it is taught: ??? a Cuthean it is permitted. a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover ??? on account of that do not ??? the commandments ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all a commandment ??? of it ??? in great quantity ??? of it -- more from Israel Mar said: ??? a Cuthean it is permitted. a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover This is obvious! What would you have said? No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? on account of that do not ??? the commandments his reasoning is No. ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all a commandment ??? of it ??? in great quantity ??? of it -- more from Israel we were Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna There is this difference between them: ??? and not ??? of it Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned immediately ??? even though that is not ??? of it and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned If it was ??? yes. If it was No. ??? No. If so, all a commandment ??? of it ??? if ??? should bring himself except There is this difference between them: that is not ??? of it a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned immediately that is not ??? even though ??? of it also No. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned immediately ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rabba said: Israel ??? he eats ??? he gives to him and it is permitted to eat ??? What is the reason? immediately That there are ??? No. ??? If so, For he did not examine also ??? No. ??? And they said to him rabbis to Raba It was taught: ??? to you ??? of those who were passing over transgression after the Paschal offering

דף ד,ב גמרא

is permitted. immediately because of that are ??? So, with whom does it agree? it is Rabbi Yehudah for he said: chametz after the Paschal offering a law established by the Torah And we have learned because of that are ??? Perhaps, No. ??? From where can you derive Perhaps It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: chametz after the Paschal offering is a law established by the Rabbis And so ??? No. ??? also Rabbi Shimon who The tanna teaches: for I say ??? because of ??? The tanna teaches: ??? for just as ??? No. ??? not all the more so? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: The entirety ??? and even a Cuthean and even ??? and even Israel ??? This ??? How so? How should we understand this? Shall I say Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? This Israel ??? he except This is obvious! ??? reasoned ??? for a matter of one shall not be ??? for all the Torah All of it I would say at the end of the teaching, and even Israel ??? This ??? How so? How should we understand this? If it was ??? to a different matter we were ??? except Is this not ??? to that very a thing ??? No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? to that very a thing No. What is the reason מאי טעמא immediately ??? of him. ??? he is equivalent. for him except ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry And it is like Rav ??? for he said: Rav ??? Shmuel said Israel ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry is permitted. to eat ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav said ??? Shmuel said Israel ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry is permitted. to eat ??? which provides ??? a king Yehudah ??? from the meals of ??? as it is said (II Chron. 18) ??? to him ??? and mornings ??? who with it ??? to ascend to ??? and Perhaps ??? zevach-offering ??? No. he ate ??? it is written and Perhaps regarding items yes. ??? regarding items and not For it is written (Deut. 13) For ??? your brother in cases regarding eating ??? For it is written (Job 2) ??? in it ??? although we don't deserve it. is more that I and Perhaps ??? No. he ate what is the difference here, drink ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry shall not be ??? for all the Torah All of it food also ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry shall not be ??? for all the Torah All of it thus now drink ??? he ??? No. ??? of some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles but: food I would say to you ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry you shall ??? for all the Torah All of it If you wish, I would say Is this not ??? without ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? it is written a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? and Perhaps its worshipers lit. those who serve it zevach-offering ??? it is written its worshipers lit. those who serve it It was not ??? and Perhaps seven of thousands ??? As it is written (I Kings 19) ??? seven of thousands all ??? who No. ??? etc. ??? are they, ??? and Perhaps men ??? are they, ??? Don't let it enter your mind! As it is written (Prov. 29) ??? on a thing that is false all ??? the wicked ones and Perhaps men ??? also No. are they, ??? men ??? men ??? its worshipers lit. those who serve it he ate ??? No. You might have thought ??? on a thing that is false all ??? the wicked ones this one for a matter of "true" ??? righteous and Perhaps ??? men ??? he ate ??? men ??? he ate ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.