It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מא,א גמרא

but: zevach-offering No. and if yes. a person ??? a thing that is not are his What then does it mean when it says a lion A sin-offering of a bird: Even if A sin-offering livestock also immediately ??? for him ??? is comparable Come and hear: two are grasping ??? one ??? one from all these and one ??? a thing is valid ??? is invalid Here in this case, with what are we dealing? is what he has ??? Come and hear: ??? in error is exempt with intent he is liable Here in this case, also, is what he has ??? some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile ??? And this is like the position of Israel that did not have before by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry we prohibit R' Yehudah en Beteira And R' Yehudah son of ??? permit that specific because of two items one that do not ??? wine except before by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and one that it is possible to say to him No. all ??? Rav ??? Rav ??? Rav Isaac They said: Even if ??? a person ??? a thing that is not are his that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי a Cuthean but: Israel ??? Come and hear: two are grasping ??? one ??? one from all these and one ??? a thing is valid ??? is invalid Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? Come and hear: ??? in error is exempt with intent he is liable Here in this case, also, ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi ??? in it ??? upon it ??? What then does it mean when it says He said to him: ??? himself ??? yes. to you ??? The greatness from this

דף מא,א משנה

yes. ??? No. ??? days and not ??? rivers and not ??? vessels but: ??? he ??? of water and ??? atop vessels yes. ??? all the essence but: makes ??? in the midst of his house on account of ??? the blood to its midst ??? No. may he do it? thus that did not have

דף מא,ב משנה

??? ???

דף מא,ב גמרא

yes. ??? No. ??? what is the difference here, ??? days that is not that they said ??? of water also They said: ??? Rabba said: ??? yes. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that is what you say? Do you really mean that? yes. ??? A general principle: Abayye said: But the beginning of the teaching, ??? He said to him: Raba Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? No. may he do it? thus from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) except Rabba said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: yes. ??? all the essence and One who wishes ??? How so? he makes makes a place except ??? and descends ??? No. may he do it? thus that did not have ??? ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Raba One who was walking ??? And he does not have a place ??? ??? sent forth ??? except ??? and descends on ??? a ship And there is no meaning to the word ??? all the essence and One who wishes ??? How so? he makes makes a place except ??? and descends ??? No. may he do it? thus It is because of this: as it is said (Lev. 18) ??? No. ??? and if One who acts thus It is necessary for him examination after it.

דף מא,ב משנה

??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering for the sake of lit. in the name of offerings? for the sake of lit. in the name of a guilt-offering suspended for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover for the sake of lit. in the name of a thangkgiving-offering ??? is invalid and Rabbi Shimon considers it proper two are grasping ??? one ??? one from all these and one ??? a thing is valid ??? is invalid ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. for the sake of lit. in the name of a guilt-offering certainly for the sake of lit. in the name of first-born for the sake of lit. in the name of tithe for the sake of lit. in the name of substitute offerings? ??? is valid This is the general rule: any thing ??? or brought as a freewill-offering ??? is forbidden but when it is not vowed as a neder-offering or brought as a freewill-offering ??? is value

דף מא,ב גמרא

??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering a guilt-offering suspended son of vowed as a neder-offering or brought as a freewill-offering he R' Yochanan said: So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer She for he said: ??? a person a guilt-offering suspended in all day Passover son of Watch out for leading vav or brought as a freewill-offering and vowed as a neder-offering he ??? for him he said R' Oshaia that I Passover Because ??? all the year All of it Thus said Rabbi ??? They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? And R' Yochanan said: Even if ??? also Oftentimes ??? for him something ??? and not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? that R' Yochanan said They did not teach such a ruling except that is not ??? A sin-offering but: ??? A sin-offering I would say ??? he makes Hey, isn't it the case that he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? he said R' Abahu in the case of one who says for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? he said ??? They did not teach such a ruling except that do not to him zevach-offering in the midst of his house but: he has zevach-offering in the midst of his house I would say ??? of him. Hey, isn't it the case that he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? R' Abahu said in the case of one who says for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? this ??? it uses these particular words to include what? to include ??? a Nazir ??? this one No. ??? I will say ??? in a guarded place but when it is not vowed as a neder-offering or brought as a freewill-offering to include ??? she will give birth R' Elazar said They did not teach such a ruling except that do not to him a woman but: he has a woman I will say ??? he makes Hey, isn't it the case that he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? R' Abahu said in the case of one who says for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? This is obvious!

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.