It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מז,א גמרא

Rabba said: Behold! both ??? who does not have ??? one ??? to it If it was ??? one She and is valid and if No. both ??? Rabba said: Hashem ??? to it ??? he baked ??? a person three ??? and two ??? or ??? or and it sprouted anew ??? This certain individual ??? in front ??? it was. ??? Rav Acha ??? He said to him What then does it mean when it says He could say to you He said to him ??? He said to him he returns ??? in front He said to him ??? I would say for him for one ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is not is according to either opinion ??? of Raba ??? and what case is he dealing with? ??? but: between between ??? This certain individual between between who has arrived in front of Rav ??? reasoned Rav Ashi ??? He said to him Rav Huna Master, son of ??? all Behold! ??? thus there is for them ??? to it ??? and what case is he dealing with? ???

דף מז,ב גמרא

but: ??? even ??? he said ??? This ??? that it is possible that they said ??? and there are that they said ??? that it is possible that they said ??? and there are that they said ??? and there are that they said ??? to it ??? Rabba said: ??? is valid ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? he except ??? is valid from that of Rabbi he gave ??? is valid from that of Rabbi he gave as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says One time ??? the sea ??? a woman One before a garment he built ??? did he die two did he die the third ??? before ??? that he was ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to it houses ??? to him until ??? in it ??? to him ??? that specific raw lit., living they were read that specific he gave ??? on my Name and for the remainder One time ??? a woman before a garment he built ??? did he die two did he die the third ??? before ??? that he was ??? in it and not he was in it blood covenant Watch out for leading vav And I said to it houses ??? to him until ??? in it ??? to him ??? that specific raw lit., living they were read that specific he gave ??? on my Name Rav said ??? is valid ??? (Ex. 22) meat in the field ??? Rav said ??? the son of of Raba This ??? For example, ??? except ??? in what way does is comparable ??? Ravina said ??? to it If it was ??? of it ??? certainly ??? he and is valid and if No. ??? He ascended ??? or ??? If it was ??? is valid and if No. ??? Rav Yosef said ??? that ??? ascended he does not ??? and Rav Yosef said This ??? If it was ??? in a case ??? He ascended ??? or ??? or ??? If it was ??? and if No. is valid and if No. ??? to it ??? is comparable ??? to it ??? No. ??? No. ??? except ??? to it ??? If it was ??? and if No. is valid ??? No. ??? and that one ??? and between he Ulla said that R' Yochanan said ??? is valid Perhaps, his reasoning is its lack ??? No. ??? its lack ??? Rabbi Abba ??? or ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? we were ??? except Is this not ??? And learn from this its lack ??? its lack No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and that he came is what you say? Do you really mean that? we were ??? it is not necessary to teach this to Rabbi Shimon for he said: until ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? of him. its lack but: ??? that there is in it: its lack even Rabbi Shimon give thanks Rabbi ??? was ill on ??? Rabbi Natan and all ??? in front ??? Rabba said: This is only in the case ??? addenda He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi ??? He said to him: ??? to it ??? If it was ??? of it ??? and if No. is valid Rav Nachman said ??? of it stood i.e., as long as he lived is valid Another teaching is like this: ??? of it stood i.e., as long as he lived even ??? is valid ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.