It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

??? of it is valid ??? of it this was an occurrance and if they put it up on the altar upon it My son, ??? three pilgrimage festivals ??? the third ??? Rav Yosef said son of ??? Rav Nachman said ??? to the wall-partition They do not concern to it ??? to it Master, Yehudah in the name ??? he said One of these and one of these ??? to it in what way does ??? Rabba said: ??? son of ??? came for me ??? his mouth ??? to it If it was that it is possible ??? according to the wall and if No. ??? She ??? and even though that is not ??? Rav ??? the son of of Rav Yosef ??? to it ??? He said to him: Mar Zutra the son of For Rav Huna the son of of Rav ??? this one of Rav ??? the son of of Rav Yosef You to this other teaching you learn to it We ??? we learn to it for he said: Raba Behold! both ??? who does not have ??? Rav ??? the son of of Rav Yosef ??? to it ??? He disagreed with this Rav Ashi This What then does it mean when it says This is satisfactory Here in this case, ??? and is valid but: there i.e., in another mishna If it was This ??? and if This ??? And who said it? It is Rav Nachman For didn't Rav Yosef say son of ??? Rav Nachman said ??? the wall ??? is valid There is no difficulty. there i.e., in another mishna in a place ??? Here in this case, that did not have in a place ??? in a case a place ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yosef said son of ??? Rav Nachman said ??? the wall ??? is valid Ravina said This is only in the case ??? He said to him: Rav Yosef ??? and if No. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps, say ??? She If so, For ??? also for it is the case that It was taught: ??? is invalid, because it was ??? is valid because it was ??? is invalid, ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? that ??? ascended He disagreed with this Rav ??? son of Chama Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Let the Tanna teach: ??? this one for he said: Rav Isaac bar Joseph Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? is valid Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Let the Tanna teach: ??? except For ??? of him ??? No. The tanna teaches: So, here, immediately ??? of him ??? No. The tanna teaches: Rabbah brought this very question son of son of ??? What then? He said to him is valid He said to him Even I says thus except ??? In the matter for he said: Rav ??? water ??? is valid He said to him: this particular ??? was it said; Rabbi Isaac son of Joseph he was going secondly, of Rabbi ??? in the marketplace ??? He said to him: it does not require Master, ??? He said to him: ??? for me ??? He said to him: ??? I He said to him: Just as ??? to you and so when they came in front of Rabbi Yochanan ??? them in front of Rabbi Yehudah ??? Shimon ??? of it in the name of Rabbi ??? Shimon ??? for him No. he reasons for himself. Rabba said: When it was that ??? secondly, of Rav ??? in the marketplace

דף מח,ב גמרא

??? And there are those who say it was in the marketplace is a law established by the Rabbis Look, ??? and did not say them and not something Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Assi are they, ??? in the marketplace ??? Look, ??? and they do not say them and not ??? was it said; ??? Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Eliezer And Rabbi ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? And Rabbi with whom does it agree? son of ??? and Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Let us say, In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned its lack ??? its lack and one master reasons that No. ??? its lack No. everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world its lack ??? No. ??? its lack and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that ??? this particular from sin ??? in front of Rabbi Ami reasoned ??? Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say Rabbi Zerika ??? or ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? we were ??? except Is this not ??? so learn from this its lack ??? its lack he returns ??? in front of Rabbi Isaac ??? reasoned ??? Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say R' ??? or ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? we were ??? except Is this not ??? so learn from this its lack ??? its lack he returns ??? in front For R' Ami ??? they said to him Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis ??? He said to them: there are. ??? We ??? Perhaps If it was it was. ??? The reason is ??? this one ??? and not ??? is valid For didn't Rav say ??? This ??? This certain individual to his fellow was it said; For didn't Rav say ??? This ??? upon it Rav Ashi said ??? yes. ??? -- this refers to ??? for behold! ??? from here ??? from here raw lit., living this particular from sin ??? Rabbah ??? in front is a law established by the Rabbis ??? Watch out for leading vav And they did not say of it No. prohibits and not permission permission they do not say of it ??? prohibits also they do not say of it immediately ??? Rabbah ??? I would say ??? this particular from sin ??? reasoned Master, the son of of Rav Yosef ??? He said to him: Rav Ashi Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? it was. ??? Master, except Rav Ashi said I saw If it was ??? for there to be wheat ??? If it was ??? and that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? but: ??? there is no difference ??? there is no difference ??? for there to be wheat ??? and what is the difference here, ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.