It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נב,א גמרא

weekday ??? No. there is a fear of them. weekday ??? there is a fear of them. ??? the road. there is a fear of them. ??? and does he act? ??? there is a fear of them. No. does he act? ??? No. there is a fear of them. ??? and all ??? there is a fear of them. ??? and all ??? there is a fear of them. all varieties of ??? yes. at them." It is because of this: ??? Abraham for there to be wheat from ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Abraham ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? Abraham ??? All things ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? Abraham No. ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? Abraham ??? Rav Ashi Sarai Ameimar ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree who permits Because specifically, where they disagree is this: it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? one ??? He could say to you in what way does ??? and one who permits He could say to you ??? and there are that they said it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? one who permits He could say to you ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? and one ??? immediately ??? he did not find ??? also he did not find ??? it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? most of ??? The rabbis taught: These are most of ??? from here ??? from here or One ten from here and one from here he said ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? that are large in which there is of them ??? Ulla said son of ??? he said ??? trapping of one ??? two ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: between ??? between ??? two ??? Rav said ??? they said to him Rav Kahana Rav ??? for Rav, ??? from here ??? from here ??? standing What then? He said to them ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav also ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and thus he comes to say Rav ??? without ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? from this general principle it would follow of Rav ??? Rav ??? without ??? They said: and he said to them ??? and Did not Ulla say: son of ??? he said ??? trapping of one ??? two ??? He could say to you there i.e., in another mishna this that did not have opposite this Here in this case, this opposite this For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say ??? two ??? two ??? it would be impossible that is not ??? one ??? this opposite this there i.e., in another mishna ??? without ??? Here in this case, ??? If so, we were of Rav they hadn't heard it. of Rav ??? of him Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav reason that that of him should request one ??? to us both For if it was in the case of of him one This is satistfactory If it was he said to us ??? all the more so both If it was he said to us is valid ??? both ??? to us If so, now also that he came he is required of him both This is satistfactory If it was He said to them is valid all the more so one and if He said to them ??? one ??? them reason that If so, ??? one ??? both ??? And then it happened that they said to him and not ??? immediately for he says them ??? we were ??? Rabba bar Rav Sheyla said: Rav Matna said Shmuel said ??? meat ??? most of ??? They challenged this from a baraita:

דף נב,ב גמרא

how much its lack ??? The academy of Shammai say: two ??? but the academy of Hillel say: ??? One And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said and thus ??? Here in this case, ??? without ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? without ??? This is satisfactory ??? without ??? It concerns itself except ??? without ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? He disagreed with this Rav Oshaya: ??? regarding my voice the academy of Shammai ??? the academy of Hillel He said to him: Rav For ??? in the matter of ??? where they did them the academy of Shammai ??? he is required Rabbi ??? most of ??? or most of ??? meat ??? most of ??? he is required Rav Ashi ??? or ??? for him ??? or ??? most of ??? and In the west, they said in the name of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina all ??? all of it This is ??? and if ??? meat ??? most of ??? something he The reason is except ??? Rabbi Ya'akov son of Nachmeni Shmuel said a place in which is not ??? she was penetrated by ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? from ??? and onwards ??? from ??? and onwards ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? she was penetrated by ??? And if you say It is to learn from this ??? also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Yehudah says she was penetrated by ??? she was penetrated by lion, ??? And if you say Rabbi Yehudah ??? For didn't Rabbi say Benjamin son of ??? he said Rabbi ??? does not come Rabbi Yehudah except ??? these are the words of the sages a person ??? If you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world ??? What would you have said? ??? The tanna teaches: Come and hear from this Rav said ??? Rav Chisdah said she was penetrated by ??? she was penetrated by ??? They challenged him from this teaching: she was penetrated by ??? until ??? but: ??? who does not have ??? No. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: she was penetrated by ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction here, ??? here, ??? from all a place for Rav, ??? it is a problem he for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: ??? says Watch out for leading vav And they did not say yes. ??? except in a place that do not ??? but: in a place in which there is ??? there are ??? in a place that do not ??? yes. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that this particular ??? among Rav Kahana ??? and on ??? and struck him ??? He ascended five ??? the blood ??? herself also ??? others he is equivalent. And the rabbbis ??? it has and not ??? that it is possible that they said So, with whom does it agree? ??? She as it is taught: ??? says Watch out for leading vav And they did not say there are ??? except in a place in which there is ??? but: in a place that do not ??? yes. ??? in a place that do not ??? yes. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that this particular ??? among Rav Kahana ??? and on ??? and struck him ??? upon it five ??? the blood ??? herself also ??? others is comparable Rav Kahana brought this very question ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.