It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נג,א גמרא

there are ??? or yes. ??? He said to him Even ??? there are ??? there are ??? or yes. ??? He said to him Even ??? yes. ??? there is regarding them ??? or Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? He said to him ??? there are ??? yes. ??? and There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one ??? Even ??? there are ??? this one ??? Even ??? yes. ??? this one ??? there are ??? yes. ??? he is required Rav Ashi the remainder of ??? there is regarding them ??? or Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? He said to him Rav Hallel to Rav Ashi For we were at among Rav Kahana he said the remainder of ??? there is regarding them ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: she was penetrated by ??? she was penetrated by ??? and there are that they said she was penetrated by ??? of him ??? Rav said ??? in the name of Rav ??? son of ??? yes. ??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that When Rav Dimi came he said It once happened ??? Rachel in the bathhose of the house of ??? came It once happened before the sages And they said there are ??? Rav said ??? this particular ??? it was. that it is possible that they said Rav said ??? in the name of Rav ??? son of ??? there are ??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that When Rav Dimi came he said It once happened ??? Rachel in the bathhose of the house of ??? came It once happened before the sages And they said yes. ??? Rav said ??? This certain individual ??? it was. Rav Yosef said ??? yes. ??? Abayye said: ??? yes. ??? except in the hand of To exclude a foot that is not yes. ??? except ??? To exclude ??? that is not yes. ??? except ??? To exclude that did not have ??? that is not yes. ??? except ??? To exclude after death that they did not say now that did not have ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. after death ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? What would you have said? ??? my field ??? Come and learn from this. ??? my field ??? Rabbah said son of Rav Huna Rav said lion, ??? to among ??? and it is found ??? of one from them They do not concern lest lion, ??? What is the reason? most of lions ??? yes. ??? and all ??? yes. ??? and this Because ??? to him ??? I will say in a wall ??? most of ??? yes. ??? and all ??? yes. ??? to him ??? and this Because ??? to him ??? I will say lion, ??? that it is possible to say thus and there are to say thus ??? the validity ??? doubt whether ??? Rav with his reasoning for he said: They do not concern ??? Abayye said: They did not say that except in a case ??? but: a place ??? also They did not say that except in a case ??? but: ??? also They did not say that except in a case one but: both and three there is a fear of them. This is only in the case ??? it was said: Rav said: They do not concern ??? And Shmuel said ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world doubt whether on doubt whether Not on I would say Not on doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? I would say ??? on ??? I will say for peace. ??? He cut off his head ??? and they ???

דף נג,ב גמרא

??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? and they ??? one master reasons that It once happened ??? does he act? in them? and one master reasons that ??? he that he came ??? he said Ameimar Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Rav Ashi said to him ??? This of Rav What then does it mean when it says He said to him No. we heard for me ??? No. ??? for me And if you like, I could say he returns of him. Rav to join with the body of of Shmuel ??? who has arrived in front of Rav ??? in front of Shmuel ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that No. he returns of him. ??? Rather, what can we conclude? he returns of him. ??? except ??? of Shmuel it was. why do I have ??? thus ??? two ten ??? will come in them? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars some texts say: to gentiles they came ??? to Israel ??? for dogs except ??? a saying ??? This certain individual son of ??? among Rav Ashi on ??? he came For ??? the blood Rav Ashi said we do not say doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? I will say ??? So, here, doubt whether ??? doubt whether ??? I will say ??? struck him They said: My son, Rabbi Chiyya ??? where they said it requires examination opposite My son, ??? Rav Yosef said this one ??? R' Chiyya Already ??? Shmuel for Shmuel said: It is because of this: R' Chaninah son of ??? where they said it requires examination opposite My son, ??? he is required ??? there are ??? or yes. ??? R' Zayra said: this one who seeks ??? Already ??? Rav ??? son of Raba for he said: Rav ??? son of Rava said: Rav ??? where they said it requires examination opposite the house of ??? all of it and even with signs he is required ??? signs ??? Rabbi Zeira said this one who seeks ??? Already ??? Rabbah son of son of ??? for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? Shmuel said ??? he is required Rav Ami ??? What then? R' Zayra said: this one who seeks Rav Ami Already ??? Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said ??? until ??? meat opposite My son, ??? that specific it is as if he does not How so? How should we understand this? ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua all ??? on meat ??? Rav Ashi said For we were at among Rav Kahana ??? this particular ??? and so when are they, ??? to it ??? then the ruling is acceptable. And so are they, ??? to it it was. ??? "She has fallen ??? "She has fallen ??? to it ??? the son of of Rav Joshua Rav ??? he said ??? until ??? meat opposite My son, ??? Rav ??? he would say over thus ??? meat opposite My son, ??? until ??? Rav said ??? he is required Rav Bibi son of Abaye

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.