It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

??? that came first ??? from here and onwards it was. for him both this and this ??? and it is permitted ??? Rav Ashi ??? they agree ??? because of ??? there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him ??? that came first If so, ??? should bring himself but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For it was taught in a baraita ??? R' Eliezer says: No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of and R' Yehoshua says ??? in what way ??? and in the end ??? R' Eliezer reasoned both this and this ??? is forbidden and Rabbi Yehoshua reasoned both this and this ??? is permitted. If so, ??? do they not disagree in the case ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of R' Yehoshua that even ??? also Sarai and do they not disagree in the case ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi Eliezer that even ??? he also forbids it. The strength ??? is preferable for him "We thank..." ??? he Rav Acha derive it ??? son of Ya'akov and he would say over to it ??? Ravina Do you not derive from this, Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? son of Ya'akov and he would say over to it ??? he said Ameimar Behold! ??? that came first ??? them If it was ??? and if No. are forbidden ??? Rav Ashi ??? "We thank..." ??? because of ??? He said to him: there i.e., in another mishna ??? that came first If so, ??? he had asked for him It was taught by ??? but how do you reconcile that with this teaching For it was taught in a baraita ??? R' Eliezer says: No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of R' Yehoshua says ??? in what way ??? and in the end ??? Rabbi Eliezer reasoned transgresses ??? of its mother he and R' Yehoshua reasoned transgresses Is this not ??? of its mother he If so, ??? do they not disagree in the case ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi Joshua and do they not disagree in the case ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of Rabbi Eliezer The strength ??? is preferable for him "We thank..." certainly ??? that came first What is the reason? ??? She And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? all two ten new ??? all that is not she will give birth Rav Huna said all the son of in which is not ??? shall not be fulfilled lit., shall not stand Twelve new Rav Pappa said: Learn from this ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Shmuel said: ??? forbidden

דף נח,ב גמרא

Behold! dates ??? and now ??? Rav said ??? son of day ??? the daughter of and now He said to him: Rav ??? Hey, isn't it the case that They said: ??? two ??? that which she said for him ??? for there to be wheat ??? upon it ??? of him and not ??? for me He said to him ??? this one that they said ??? with whom does it agree? ??? for him ??? who that it is possible ??? how much you shall except ??? Here in this case, also, with two ??? It was taught there: livestock ??? Hashem pilgrimage festivals or that it does not have except three behold! This is הרי זה ??? Rav Huna said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? in the hand of but: lacking ??? also ??? What is the reason? all ??? he is equivalent. this particular ??? to it both ??? and if ??? is valid this particular ??? reasoned Rav Ashi ??? He said to him Rav Huna Master, son of Chiyya to Rav Ashi all Behold! ??? thus there is for them This certain individual ??? reasoned Master, son of Rav Ashi ??? He said to him: Rav Oshaya: because all of them ??? in a case ??? was it said; in a case that is not was it said; No. was it said; ??? he gave son of ??? Rav ??? before Rabbi on two My son, ??? from ??? that it ??? is valid Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? with two ??? but: ??? in one place ??? until ??? is valid They disagreed about this, Rav Ami Rav ??? One says he ??? and one says even though that is not ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: he ??? we were where he teaches until ??? except for one for he said: even though that is not ??? What then does it mean when it says until ??? until ??? R' Yehuda says: if ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: R' Yehudah and R' Yishmael And they said a thing one R' Yehudah this one of which we were speaking? R' Yishmael For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yishmael says ??? Rabba said: perhaps, No. She Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yehudah Here in this case, except in the matter of ??? something ??? upon it but: in the matter of ??? he reasons for himself. and Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yishmael there i.e., in another mishna except in the matter of ??? but: in the matter of ??? No. ???

דף נח,ב משנה

??? the blood ??? ??? or ??? water the evil ones is valid ??? or ??? a snake it is permitted. It is because of this: ??? forbidden It is because of this: ??? souls

דף נח,ב גמרא

Shmuel said ??? ??? Neusner translates as asafoetida ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? them ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? the blood ??? ??? water the evil ones ??? ??? Neusner translates as asafoetida ??? is valid ??? a snake or ??? a mute it is permitted. It is because of this: ??? forbidden It is because of this: ??? souls it is a problem ??? Neusner translates as asafoetida ??? it is a problem ??? ??? Neusner translates as asafoetida ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one ??? we were ??? two kinds of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Yehudah said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.