It's a start Dafcast Draft
ראש השנה
מועד קטן
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
עבודה זרה


Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits


This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.


This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."


I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ז,א גמרא

except a place ??? to him ??? in it Even I a place ??? for me my fathers ??? in it from here ??? wise who said a thing The halacha is that do not ??? that specific And there are those who say it was yes. ??? that specific And there are those who say it was yes. ??? that specific The one who said ??? as it is written (BOOK TITLE 39) and not ??? and the one who said yes. ??? As it is written (Lam. 3) For No. ??? In reality lit: In the world Hashem and the one who said ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? the heart his rabbi; ??? He disagreed with this Yehudah the son of R' Shimon ben Pazi: and who that it is possible for one for he said: ??? Is this not from the land of Israel She For it is written (Judges 1) and not ??? the house of ??? and ??? and ??? and ??? this one for he said: R' Shimon son of ??? It is because of this: R' Elazar son of ??? who said it in the name of R' Elazar son of ??? in great quantity ??? Egypt" and not ??? but his thought is "Kedushah" the first ??? and not ??? in the future in going ??? so that ??? about them ??? in the seventh year He said to him: R' ??? to Rabbi Zeira Hey, isn't it the case that R' Meir He ascended in reality he ??? He said to him: ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: ??? and Perhaps Is this not ??? now ??? of righteous yes. the Holy One, Who is Blessed sends ??? on ??? righteous ??? is it not all the more so? and Perhaps ??? upon them from someplace else No. ??? a fellowship ??? that did not have from ??? and Perhaps he gave ??? beside this he ate beside after He said to him: Look, one a person Rabbah ??? upon it What then does it mean when it says ??? of righteous of Rabbi ??? son of ??? he was going ??? of him. ??? He said to him: ??? for me ??? about You He said to him: you walks to do favor ??? and as for me, walks to do favor ??? you doubt whether makes doubt whether If it was you makes I certainly makes He said to him: if If it was you ??? upon you that did not have ??? about You water In reality lit: In the world a portion for him it was. There was this guy ??? He said to him: ??? for him also for this ??? a portion for him it was. This certain individual ??? He said to him: ??? for him also for this that is not Let us say, thus in the same way ??? to the children of ??? a portion for him Rav Yosef said how much ??? a person ??? For this there i.e., in another mishna one ??? and here in this other case, three Oftentimes and Perhaps Here in this case, also, one ??? except ??? to this some ??? for him ??? No. he ate

דף ז,ב גמרא

??? No. he ate ??? No. he ate He said to them Perhaps No. ??? he ate he said ??? -- this refers to ??? to do favor he acquires and you ??? it ??? and who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: the one who purchased ??? and to a domesticated animal ??? and oil ??? and oil ??? in it the vessels is exempt ??? there i.e., in another mishna this one was it said; He ascended Rabbi Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? from the beginning to a domesticated animal but: ??? from the beginning to a person but he had second thoughts upon them to a domesticated animal he is liable ??? For it was taught: the one who purchased fruits from ??? as regard to eating, but he had second thoughts about them to a domesticated animal Behold! this They do not give it No. before his animal and not before ??? his fellow But rather, if so, ??? "Hear!" Rabbi ??? He said to him: ??? He said to him: there are. ??? his face of Rabbi He said to him: ??? you ??? benefit from Israel I Israel ??? there are. there are ??? And he does not have and there are in which there is to him and does not ??? and then it is written (Prov. 23) to ??? bread evil" well and do not ??? For just as the gate ??? thus he ??? it is said to you and his heart ??? Your nation And you, ??? and there are to you from this now ??? of a commandment ??? For ??? For he came ??? on ??? where they did ??? of him. ??? he said the angel of death in his house of this and as for me, ??? opposite him. "Hear!" Rabbi ??? He said to him: ??? them He said to him: (Lev. 19) and before ??? No. ??? them ??? them that it is possible ??? life, ??? them that it is possible (Deut. 20) ??? it was. ??? of him. ??? a mountain ??? Rabbi and he said Just as ??? thus in the same way ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! for he said: R' Chama son of ??? righteous ??? -- more ??? as it is said (II Kings 13) And it was are these ??? a man and behold saw ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man in the grave Elisha ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? Elisha ??? and He established on his feet He said to him: Rav ??? and perhaps, ??? of him. ??? As it is written (II Kings 2) And it was please, the mouth of two ??? to me He said to him: If so, we were as it is taught: on his feet he stood and to his house No. he has walked except a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? Like that which was said by R' Yochanan ??? that it ??? as it is said (Num. 12) to please, she became ??? he said R' Yehoshua son of Levi For what reason is called oil days ??? on ??? for he said: R' Chaninah ??? No. ??? a person on ??? the moon raw lit., living Hey, isn't it the case that ??? I would say ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? say (Deut. 4) yes. any more ??? he said Rabbi ??? and even of witchcraft this particular ??? of Rabbi ??? he said to it ??? No. ??? yes. any more ??? it is written For didn't R' Yochanan say For what reason is called oil of witchcraft ??? of ??? that I R' Chaninah ??? and R' Chanina said yes. a person ??? its spur lit., its finger downwards except If so, ??? upon it upwards as it is said (Ps. 37) from Hashem" ??? (Prov. 20) a person Just as ??? R' Elazar said blood ??? an elevation-offering Rabba said: ??? two This is only in the case with one who goes for a matter of a commandment And they said about R' ??? son of ??? No. ??? on ??? that is not are his From the day ??? on ??? No. benefit from the meals of his father

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.