It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עא,א גמרא

livestock that is tamei are in the general category raw lit., living that is tamei livestock that is tahor are in the general category raw lit., living that is tahor ??? He said to me: ??? on ben Azzai that did not have ??? Rabbi Yishmael raw lit., living are in the general category livestock From where do we derive this? As it is written (Deut. 14) this ??? who ??? ox ??? etc. a ram and a deer ??? etc. How so? raw lit., living are in the general category livestock livestock are in the general category raw lit., living From where do we derive this? As it is written (Lev. 11) this ??? who ??? from all ??? who on the land all ??? a parsa How so? livestock are in the general category raw lit., living raw lit., living that is tahor are in the general category livestock that is tahor ??? raw lit., living that is tamei are in the general category livestock that is tamei ??? livestock that is tamei are in the general category raw lit., living that is tamei ??? as it is taught: Rabbi says I invoke, I raw lit., living livestock For what reason ??? here, livestock that is tamei and it is said there livestock that is tamei Just as there ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use Even here, ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use livestock that is tahor are in the general category raw lit., living that is tahor ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" between ??? between ??? if male, ??? if female ??? he does not ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: all that is not ??? a person he does not ??? and According to the sages, This he read why do I have completely ??? he who has arrived

דף עא,א משנה

the his wife ??? in the midst of ??? raw lit., living ??? in it ??? that is tamei ??? seven the his wife that is tahor until they go out ???

דף עא,א גמרא

Rabbah said in the same way ??? It is not imparts tumah thus in the same way ??? It is not ??? From where do we derive this? As it is written (Lev. 11) and One who eats ??? Are we are not dealing he was eating close to the setting of the sun and he said the Merciful One tahor and Perhaps It is different there in that case that is not ??? This is satistfactory to Rabbi Yochanan for he said: One -- this refers to and one -- this refers to until ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except for there to be wheat ??? for he said: ??? is stricter ??? lightweight until ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? he ??? that is not ??? in his face, that did not have in his face, ??? for him ??? From where do we derive this? ??? for just as implements of pottery ??? a thread" that is not ??? on ??? As Mar said: ??? and ascend until ??? on ???

דף עא,ב גמרא

a person ??? on ??? is it not logical ??? on ??? Just as ??? pottery which provides yes. become tamei ??? shall you say ??? because We ??? we say it. ??? we say it. ??? implements of pottery a donkey which provides become tamei ??? From where do we derive this? ??? for just as is more that is not makes ??? to the bottom which does ??? is it not logical ??? anything makes ??? to the bottom except by way of lit., through the hands of ??? Even if thus ??? Rav ??? From where do we derive this? ??? for just as a person ??? livestock that is not imparts tumah ??? is it not logical ??? Just as to a person which provides It is necessary for him ??? in the house of ??? shall you say ??? that is not it requires ??? in the house of ??? livestock ??? it requires ??? in the house of ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? for upon ??? a person also it does not require For it was taught in a baraita One who enters ??? and its implements on ??? he there are. ??? immediately he was ??? its implements ??? he tamei immediately there are. ??? until ??? bread ??? and not bread ??? is reclining and eats ??? Rabba said: both of them. ??? ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? that is tamei ??? and eats ??? that is tamei ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? that is tahor and he has entered ??? the dead ??? and year" and immersed ??? Behold! She how much ??? and thus he comes to say Rabbah For example, ??? two finger-rings One that is tamei and one that is tahor that is not ??? to it imparts tumah ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.