It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עג,א גמרא

??? he is equivalent. like who like Rabbi ??? For it was taught in a baraita all ??? the vessels that are ??? until a place ??? and the sages ??? Yehudah ??? until ??? all of it even you say rabbis ??? they eat like who ??? he is equivalent. ??? This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches ??? except ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? But the sages say: ??? who ??? yes. ??? of Shmuel for he said: The father of Shmuel ??? imparts tumah ??? What do we find ??? Even ??? livestock ??? ??? It was taught: He said to them: Rabbi Meir And so who ??? this something ??? of its mother If so, ??? in cases regarding eating They said to him: in great quantity ??? on that is not ??? -- more ??? for behold! We learned: ??? from who transgress ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating from ??? and from ??? is forbidden in cases regarding eating What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabba said: And there are those who say it was so that it is lacking a missing clause And this is what the tanna means to teach: He said to them: R' Meir And so who ??? this something ??? of its mother If so, ??? in cases regarding eating They said to him: ??? something ??? It is not ??? in cases regarding eating He said to them: No. if ??? it a thing that it ??? ??? a thing that is not ??? They said to him: in great quantity ??? on that is not ??? -- more ??? for behold! We learned: ??? from who transgress ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating from ??? and from ??? is forbidden in cases regarding eating Another teaching is like this: He said to them: Rabbi Meir And so who ??? this something ??? They said to him: ??? of its mother If so, ??? in cases regarding eating They said to him: ??? something ??? It is not ??? in cases regarding eating He said to them: if ??? it and ??? of it a thing ??? who transgress that is not ??? They said to him: in great quantity ??? on that is not ??? -- more ??? for behold! We learned: ??? from who transgress ??? is permitted. in cases regarding eating from ??? and from ??? is forbidden in cases regarding eating he said ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? the words of all are ??? makes ??? R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina What is the reason מאי טעמא of R' Yochanan who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis This it has ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he does not have ??? They challenged him from this teaching: He said to them: R' Meir No. if ??? it and ??? of it a thing ??? who transgress a thing that is not ???

דף עג,ב גמרא

This is satisfactory to Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) to their words he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me there is no difference ??? and there is no difference ??? For ??? except to Rabbi Yochanan it is a problem except If it was said, thus was it said; Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish Resh Lakish said: ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? yes. ??? makes ??? R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yochanan who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Meir This ??? and that one Is this not ??? Rav said Isaac son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said Everyone acknowledges ??? makes ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? makes ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? except ??? death ??? death ??? It is necessary for him ??? become tamei It is because of this: ??? from ??? and does not become tamei It is because of this: ??? from ??? These are the words of R' Meir ??? also ??? livestock ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. Rabbi Shimon says: No. ??? If it was ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? The tanna teaches: What would you have said? one ??? from ??? and one ??? from ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? That this ??? You might have thought that I would say that Because and become tamei ??? is stricter ??? his father I would say No. that ??? should request Come and hear from this. Rav Yosef said ??? of Rav Isaac son of Joseph into your hand of Rabbah son of son of ??? he arises ??? as it is taught: (Ex. 22) meat in the field ??? No. ??? ??? that are are forbidden and Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.