It's a start Dafcast Draft
ראש השנה
מועד קטן
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
עבודה זרה


Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits


This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.


This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."


I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עז,א גמרא

??? about them on Passover And furthermore, the Torah ??? on ??? of Israel He said to him Rav ??? Rabbi Shimon son of ??? a law established by the Torah and is what you say? Do you really mean that? What then does it mean when it says ??? them He was silent. But why? He was silent. For didn't Raba say Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? son of ??? three that I Here in this case, ??? of him. R' Yochanan ??? son of ??? to ??? an individual I he learns Mishna it This certain individual ??? and went out outwards ??? of him he came in front ??? three ??? He said to him Rav ??? son of ??? in front of Raba the son of of Rav Yosef son of Chama ??? he came in front he said ??? and went out outwards We have learnt in a Mishna: What do I have to learn from stillborn lit., fallen What do I have to learn from ??? He said to him Ravina to Raba ??? What then? ??? What then? ??? What then? How so? ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua all ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? What then? ??? What then? ??? What then? was taken ??? What then? Come and hear: for he said: ??? R' Yochanan said: ??? Behold! he ??? Perhaps ??? that are his Rav Ashi said For we were at among Rav ??? to us ??? What then? ??? for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said This item ??? to the sages ??? And they said ??? long but: ??? Rav Pappa said: This is only in the case ??? the tooth that are his

דף עז,א משנה

??? ??? and found of it ??? It is not imparts tumah No. ??? they eat and not ??? upon it imparts tumah ??? they eat but not ??? forbidden in cases regarding eating a sign of ??? and the sign ??? for dogs ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? it ??? the road. And there is no meaning to the word ??? it by a tree because of ???

דף עז,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? ??? (Deut. 14) all livestock ??? ??? It is possible even Came forth ??? Scripture states: it it and not ??? yes. ??? without ??? why do I have he read he read ??? It is not ??? he is required R' Isaac son of ??? a donkey ??? What then? for what If it was ??? they eat ???

דף עז,ב גמרא

If it was ??? they eat as it is taught: ??? yes. impart tumah ??? they eat ??? upon it impart tumah ??? they eat ??? also ??? (Lev. 11) ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and not ??? and Rabbah said son of Rav Channah No. ??? except ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? they eat that I ??? a donkey ??? R' Elazar said They did not teach such a ruling except that do not ??? but: there are ??? They do not concern ??? after And R' Yochanan said: between yes. ??? between there are ??? after Really? Hey, isn't it the case that Thus said Rabbi ??? he said R' Elazar except If it was said, thus was it said; R' Elazar said They did not teach such a ruling except that is not ??? but: ??? They do not concern ??? after And R' Yochanan said: do we We do not have except ??? without ??? but: there are ??? between ??? between yes. ??? They do not concern ??? after And this is like the position for he said: R' ??? he said R' Elazar This teaching is consistent with the position For R' ??? livestock raw lit., living and "uf" ??? with them at a time i.e., in a case ??? of them They do not concern ??? after It is not ??? of them ??? casts upon it ??? two ??? for I say lest ??? then the ruling is acceptable. of ??? lest ??? of ??? What is the reason? Rav said ??? the son of of Rav Ami most of ??? a thing ??? a thing that is not ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? and all ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? are they, them ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? son of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Abaye and Raba that they said ??? any thing in which there is in it ??? yes. in it It is because of this: ??? yes. in it ??? there are in it It is because of this: ??? For it was taught: tree ??? This is satisfactory ??? so that thus it will be

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.