It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

??? except ??? why is it that so that thus it will be ??? and that prayers for mercies should request ??? As it is taught: (Lev. 13) and tamei tamei he should read It is necessary for him ??? to the public and many ??? upon it mercies and thus who ??? in it a thing It is necessary for him ??? to the public and many ??? upon it mercies Ravina said like who ??? like who For This a Tanna taught:

דף עח,א משנה

that specific and his son accustomed between in the land." between ??? before the house or in the case that one is not before the house ??? How so? ??? that specific and his son Those who are ill outside both are proper and the second ??? ??? holy offerings outside ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off and both of them, ??? and both of them, ??? ??? Those who are ill inside both ??? and the second ??? ??? holy offerings inside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid, Those who are ill and holy offerings outside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid, holy offerings and Those who are ill outside ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off is invalid, and the second is valid and both of them, ??? ??? Those who are ill and holy offerings inside both ??? and the second ??? ??? holy offerings and Those who are ill inside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid, Those who are ill outside and inside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid, holy offerings outside and inside ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off and both of them, ??? ??? and both of them, ??? Those who are ill inside and outside ??? is invalid, but exempt him and the second ??? ??? and is valid holy offerings inside and outside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid,

דף עח,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught from where do we learn to that very and his son ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 22) ox or ??? or ??? For ??? and it is written secondly: (Lev. 22) ??? or ??? that specific and his son No. ??? by day one ??? on that specific and his son ??? and so go ahead and say ??? yes. ??? No. ox ??? and so go ahead and say ??? yes. ??? No. it is written ??? on one topic ??? If it was Just as holy offerings ??? No. Even that specific and his son ??? No. Why is it that It was taught: that specific and his son accustomed ??? And furthermore, ??? it is written Rabba said:

דף עח,ב גמרא

this he built ??? in all places as it is said ??? he does not except to discharge the mitzvah ??? Scripture states: or ??? ??? This or should bring himself ??? I thought to say until ??? ox his son ??? his son No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? should bring himself to account for that which was taught Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said ox ??? his son I was says until ??? ox ??? his son Scripture states: (Lev. 22) ox or ??? that specific and his son Is this not ??? for him No. ??? This is satistfactory According to the sages, ??? them that specific except ??? that is not ??? for him that specific ??? for him ??? It is not necessary he read ??? to it ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 20) a man who ??? his father and of its mother yes. for me except his father and his mother his father that did not have of its mother and his mother that did not have his father from where do we learn Scripture states: (Lev. 20) his father and his mother ??? his father ??? of its mother ??? these are the words of R' ??? R' ??? says ??? both ??? one alone by itself until ??? to you the scripture ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says rabbis as it is taught: that specific and his son accustomed ??? and is not customary ??? says accustomed between ??? or whether ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא is a law established by the Rabbis as it is taught: It is possible ??? that specific and his son accustomed between ??? or whether ??? It would be a logical inference he is liable here, he is liable ??? on ??? Just as ??? on ??? and not ??? Even ??? here, ??? and not ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? on ??? which provides No. One who acts of it ??? shall you say ??? and his son the one who did in it ??? Scripture states: that specific ??? and not two after ??? the scripture my ruling that a person is innocent? ??? he is liable here, he is liable ??? on ??? Just as ??? on ??? and not ??? Even ??? here, ??? and not ??? and if your soul to say his son who ??? winds after him: he has fulfilled his obligation male, that do not his son winds after him: Just as if your soul to say And if you say that specific male, ??? Behold! he says his son who ??? winds after him: he has fulfilled his obligation male, that do not his son winds after him:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.