It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פ,א גמרא

??? And even if a small portion of ??? rabbis reason that ??? And even if a small portion of ??? and Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? and not a small portion of ??? Rav Pappa said: Therefore, in the matter of ??? the blood and gifts No. ??? except ??? that comes on ??? According to the sages, or whether to R' Eliezer from doubt them If it was ??? or No. ??? and even a small portion of ??? in the matter of that specific and his son It concerns itself between ??? that comes on ??? or whether ??? that comes on ??? that comes on ??? is a law established by the Rabbis reason that perhaps, ??? And even if a small portion of ??? say is forbidden and Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? also ??? and even a small portion of ??? we do not say ??? that comes on ??? rabbis reason that ??? also ??? and even a small portion of ??? say ??? for him and Rabbi Eliezer reasoned ??? that it is possible ??? there is not in this case. ??? that it is possible Perhaps They do not concern ??? and that one ??? he ??? there is not in this case. Perhaps ??? and even a small portion of ??? we do not say Rav Yehudah said ??? the son of in its own right She and not ??? of it the sages if ??? livestock She if ??? raw lit., living She Rav ??? he said ??? this a ram the wheat ??? this a ram the wheat and there are those who say יש אומרים this that comes from ??? and from ??? R' Yosei says ??? the son of in its own right She and not ??? of it the sages if ??? raw lit., living if ??? livestock Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says ??? livestock She and of the house of ??? they were ??? from them ??? R' Zeira said Thus said Rabbi ??? Rav Hamnunah said Behold! ??? to join with the body of An altar of derive it This is like for he said: R' Isaac ten ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars the scripture And naught else and Behold! ??? them ??? Learn from this ??? He disagreed with this Rav Acha son of Ya'akov and so go ahead and say (Deut. 14) a ram and a deer creates an exclusion all livestock A general principle: creates an exclusion and A general principle: was it made? A general principle: ??? on ??? that it is possible ??? If so, all Behold! ??? why do I have He disagreed with this Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? and Perhaps ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi And there are those who say it was Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Perhaps ??? or ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Ameimar Sarai ??? Abba brought this very question the son of of Rav ??? son of Chiyya ??? son of Chiyya Behold! ??? What then? to join with the body of An altar of He said to him Up to this point, does not disagree Rabbi Yosei And the rabbbis except ??? the wheat For it was taught in a baraita ox the wheat ??? livestock he Rabbi Yosei says: ??? raw lit., living is a law established by the Rabbis reason that ??? he and R' Yosi reasoned ??? He accounts for for him ??? he but: Behold! the words of all are ??? He disagreed with this Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? and Perhaps ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: and Perhaps ??? or ??? He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Ameimar Sarai ??? How so? ??? said Rabbi Osha'ya All of it Our mishna that is not like R' Shimon From where can you derive ??? It was taught by holy offerings outside ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off and both of them, ??? and both of them, ??? ??? for him to Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? that is not ??? No. her name ???

דף פ,ב גמרא

that came first ??? killed him two ??? inside he he is spiritually cut off also ??? Those who are ill inside both ??? and the second ??? ??? for him to Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? that is not ??? No. her name ??? that came first ??? killed him two why is it that ??? ??? holy offerings inside ??? is valid but exempt him and the second ??? ??? is invalid, ??? for him to Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? that is not ??? No. her name ??? holy offerings also ??? that is not ??? She ??? that is not he could sprinkle blood No. ??? meat two why is it that ??? ??? is invalid, except Learn from this that is not like Rabbi Shimon This is obvious! ??? holy offerings ??? for him You might have thought that I would say that ??? holy offerings ??? She for it is the case that If it was ??? and he could sprinkle blood No. ??? meat And so ??? meat ??? She Come and learn from this. ??? also It is because of this: Is this not ??? time as it is taught: from where do we learn for all ??? that he was without ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 22) ??? etc. ??? on ??? that he was without ??? For ??? He accounts for ??? and his son ??? No. ??? He accounts for and not Hey, isn't it the case that holy offerings outside ??? He accounts for where he teaches holy offerings outside ??? he is liable he is spiritually cut off and both of them, ??? ??? This is satisfactory two It is because of this: Is this not ??? and his son except ??? why is it that ??? Is this not It is because of this: Is this not ??? except all in a case ??? Is this not ??? and his son He accounts for ??? and all in a case That there are Is this not ??? and his son No. He accounts for ??? Rabbi Zeira he said ??? time ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.