It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פח,א גמרא

and both these and these: yes. impart tumah but the remainder of all ??? between ??? between ??? from them ??? of them and both these and these: at first except for ??? that he was ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? Is this not ??? and One suffering from gonorrhea ??? did he die No. ??? One suffering from gonorrhea what is the difference here, One suffering from gonorrhea ??? of him. rabbis and what is the difference here, did he die that is not ??? of him. rabbis One suffering from gonorrhea that is not ??? of him ??? of him. rabbis did he die ??? of him No. ??? of him. ??? blood ??? for upon ??? The rabbis taught: ??? This teaches ??? for upon ??? he is liable ??? Rabbi Yehuda said when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case that do not in that place blood except he but: there are in that place blood that did not have he is exempt ??? Another teaching ??? This teaches for all of ??? he is liable ??? from here blood said ??? for upon ??? he is liable ??? he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel Regarding what matters are we speaking? that did not have ??? blood ??? but: ??? blood ??? is exempt ??? in what way ??? rabbis reason that ??? all ??? R' Yehudah reasoned ??? and even a small portion of ??? and Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned ???

דף פח,א משנה

a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? And regarding what yes. ??? with lime and with clay ??? but: yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? and not ??? that did not have ??? and not ??? upon it ??? A general principle: he said Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel a thing ??? in it ??? in it but when it is not ??? yes. ??? therein.

דף פח,א גמרא

How so? weekday ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: all that do not ??? It is necessary for him ??? and there is someone who teaches this as referring ??? but: yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? How so? weekday ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said R' Yochanan said: all ??? It is necessary for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? There is this difference between them: ??? And it is not necessary ??? The rabbis taught: ??? It is possible ??? or ??? upon it ??? Therefore, scripture states: in dust And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? from where do we learn ??? manure ??? and weekday ??? stones ??? flax that are small

דף פח,ב גמרא

??? of ??? that are small ??? the moon ??? Scripture states: ??? It is possible that I ??? Even manure ??? and weekday ??? implements of ??? and the moon ??? that did not have ??? Scripture states: in dust for just as you see ??? those and to discharge the mitzvah those after ??? the scripture ??? I those that are ??? and sends forth I those that do not ??? I would say ??? A general principle: ??? creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? yes. something other than this did not say Rav ??? It is because of this: ??? A general principle: ??? and all A general principle: ??? yes. ??? that specific are in the general category and creates an exclusion ??? Rav ??? son of Rav Chisda yes. ??? except In the matter ??? in it ??? Rabba said: This ??? He said to him Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak to Raba What then does it mean when it says ??? I ??? One who was walking in the wilderness And he does not have ??? he shatters ??? gold ??? One who was walking ??? And he does not have ??? This is satisfactory ??? except ??? gold From where do we derive this? R' Zeira said (Job 28) ??? gold to him The rabbis taught: yes. ??? except in dust these are the words of the academy of Shammai but the academy of Hillel say: ??? as it is said (Num. 19) ??? and the academy of Shammai ??? burning ??? No. ??? a Tanna taught: ??? about them ??? and there are those who say Even ??? Rabba said: For a payment who said Avraham our father (Gen. 18) and I myself ??? his children to have two the commandments ??? a cow ??? Sotah ??? also ??? the blood there i.e., in another mishna ??? a commandment that it is possible benefit there is not in this case. Rabba said: For a payment who said Avraham our father

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.