It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פט,א גמרא

(Gen. 14) if ??? and until ??? his children to have two the commandments ??? of ??? of tefillin This is satisfactory ??? of tefillin it is written (Deut. 28) "and they shall see -- all with me" the land For in that place Hashem is called upon you and it was taught: R' Eliezer an adult male says these tefillin that are of the head. except ??? of ??? Who is it as it is taught: Rabbi Meir says: Just as ??? from all ??? because of ??? to the sea ??? and the stone ??? the honor As it is written (Ex. 24) and they shall fear the God of Israel and under his feet etc. and then it is written (Ezek. 1) ??? the stone ??? a cup Thus said Rabbi Abba Difficult is ??? for even if righteous ??? are not it is possible for them ??? as it is said (Gen. 14) ??? He spat who he ate ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon in all places where you finds his words of Rabbi Eliezer his son of Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean ??? One who acts ??? (Deut. 7) No. ??? from all the nations ??? Hashem among you etc. He said to them: the Holy One, Who is Blessed to Israel ??? among you for even if at the hour that I ??? to you that is large "You ??? before I have given that is large for Avraham he said before (Gen. 18) and I myself ??? to Moses ??? he said (Ex. 16) ??? Just as of David he said (Ps. 22) and I myself ??? and not a man but: some texts read: worshippers of stars ??? are not thus I have given that is large ??? he said (Gen. 11) ??? to us a city ??? he said (Ex. 5) who Hashem ??? he said (II Kings 18) who in all the God of the lands etc. ??? he said (Is. 14) ??? on ??? a king rock he said (Ezek. 28) of dwelling God ??? Watch out for leading vav "And in the hearts of days Rabba said: (and there are those who say R' Yochanan The greatness as it is said ??? -- more ??? as it is said ??? For this ??? it is written and I myself ??? And even ??? it is written ??? Just as Rabba said: (and there are those who say R' Yochanan yes. the world. shall endure except on account of Moses ??? It is written here ??? Just as And it is written there (Job 26) ??? earth on ??? he said Rabbi ??? yes. the world. shall endure except on account of who ??? himself in the hour of ??? as it is said ??? earth on ??? Rabbi Abahu he said who ??? himself ??? that is not as it is said (Deut. 33) ??? the world Rabbi Yitzchak said What then does it mean that it is written (Ps. 58) ??? Righteousness ??? people Just as ??? of a person in the world" ??? himself ??? It is possible Even according to the words of Torah Therefore, scripture states: Righteousness ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? people he said Rabbi ??? (and there are those who say Rabbah son of ??? in dust a city ??? But why? ??? benefit he he said ??? No. ??? except ??? As it is written (Deut. 13) and all ??? to ??? who that is not ??? except ??? he has fulfilled his obligation this ??? And Rabba said the commandments Is this not ??? Ravina and he said to it about this teaching ??? Rav ??? shofar of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry No. ??? in it Is this not if ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. No. if ??? he has fulfilled his obligation A lulav of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry he does not take Is this not if he took it, He has not fulfilled his obligation. No. if he took it, he has fulfilled his obligation For it was taught: ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. he took He has not fulfilled his obligation. Rav Ashi said thus now there i.e., in another mishna

דף פט,ב גמרא

??? in the case of ??? Here in this case, all Just as ??? from upon me ???

דף פט,ב משנה

??? accustomed in the land." and "in outside the land" i.e., outside the land of Israel before the house or in the case that one is not before the house ??? accustomed ??? one who recites a blessing of ??? one who recites a blessing of ??? and is not customary ??? because of that do not to him ??? accustomed ??? R' Yehuda says: is not customary ??? is permitted. And there is no meaning to the word ??? are believed on ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir But the sages say: are believed upon it and on ???

דף פט,ב גמרא

??? This is obvious! It is because of this: ??? for him prohibits ??? of him And if you say there are ??? and comes prohibits ??? This ??? accustomed ??? should bring himself except his reasoning is yes. ??? prohibits ??? that it is possible prohibits ??? there is not in this case. reasoned a Tanna taught: ??? yes. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? of it ??? if there are of it ??? Behold! This is forbidden except Here in this case, ??? holy offerings is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) but his thought is accustomed ??? but his thought is ??? holy offerings ??? "Amen" there are. ??? which is a prohibition ??? prohibits ??? together ??? and who seeks ??? to it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, accustomed ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: This item It is a disagreement of Rabbi Yehudah And the rabbbis and who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? together ??? For it was taught in a mishna: on these ??? on the dead and on an olive's volume from the dead it is a problem to us on an olive's volume from the dead ??? on all of it is it not all the more so? And Rabbi Yochanan said No. ??? except ??? that did not have ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.