It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

these are the words of Rabbi Shimon ??? for him They said: Rav like Rabbi Shimon son of ??? for he said: According to the sages, my sanctity ??? the house they were are in the general category ??? my sanctity An altar of No. they were are in the general category ??? and not ??? it is taught at the end and if Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? said From where can you derive for it is the case that Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? ??? It is because of this: who seeks ??? he Perhaps It is because of this: ??? ??? for dogs he They said: If so, ??? if ??? And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world Rav like Rabbi Yochanan he reasons for himself. It was taught by these are the words of Rabbi Shimon ??? but: Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Deut. 12) a deer Just as a deer is exempt from ??? Even invalid as regarding ??? are exempt from ??? I ??? and not ??? ??? Therefore, scripture states: a ram Just as a ram is exempt from ??? and from ??? Even invalid as regarding ??? are exempt from ??? and from ??? If it was Just as a deer and a ram ??? is permitted. Even invalid as regarding ??? is permitted. Scripture states: ??? a portion Mar said: ??? the first-born and not ??? ??? what is the difference here, ??? the first-born that do not the value of in all and not ??? ??? in all Scripture states: a ram He said to him: Rav ??? If it was Just as a deer and a ram yes. that specific and his son accustomed of them Even invalid as regarding ??? yes. that specific and his son accustomed in it He said to him for what ??? them If it was ??? that specific and his son accustomed in it and if ??? that specific and his son accustomed in it He said to him: If so, regarding ??? also Let him say thus for what ??? them If it was ??? is forbidden and if ??? is forbidden except Is this not who is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? and not ??? I would say also ??? and not that specific and his son Rava said: ??? to that very and his son he who has arrived ??? As it is written (Deut. 15) He spat ??? It may not be eaten What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? actually and really No. ??? except their blood ??? and a ram because their blood ??? and a ram who Sarai except ??? the Merciful One ??? If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: milk then I might incorrectly say: ??? he read ??? and so when the writing of he is spiritually cut off ??? milk livestock it is written: as it is said (Lev. 7) For All food milk from ??? he read ??? upon it ??? in reality ??? the Merciful One ??? to say to you Just as ??? Even ??? Hey, isn't it the case that a Tanna taught: ??? and not ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: This is what he means: Watch out for leading vav !! And even It is not said ??? I was says ??? and not ??? now as it is said ??? to that very and his son he ??? and are not ??? From where do we derive this? ??? (Deut. 12) ??? and not ??? meat and not milk "And you shall eat and not ??? from here that do not ??? ??? for dogs

דף טו,ב גמרא

that it is possible that they said (Deut. 12) ??? "And you shall eat yes. to you of them permission food except ??? but: ??? ??? for dogs ??? is forbidden after ??? How so? Shall I say ??? after ??? why is it that ??? a deer and a ram ??? except ??? before ??? after ??? this one before ??? also my sanctity From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught male, ??? ??? and female ??? ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? ??? from where do we learn For as it says: if male, ??? if female ??? those particular ??? that are after ??? Just as shall be about them before ??? in them? that it is possible for one for he said: my sanctity ??? and there are for one for he said: my sanctity ??? Just as shall be about them Rav Huna said ??? to the dome there are. ??? "Kedushah" ??? No. ??? In the west, they said in the name of Rabbi ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of that specific zevach-offering immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? This comes to imply ??? except I would say immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? "Amen" ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of that specific zevach-offering The reason is What then does it mean when it says he said Rabbi Levi ??? lest ??? from them ??? Ravina brought this very question ??? What then? ??? for all zevach-offering ??? He said to him yes. ??? What is the reason? He said to him: ??? Just as first-born yes. ??? for all zevach-offering ??? As it is written (Lev. 27) ??? first-born who ??? to Hashem ??? etc. No. ??? a man that specific Even Behold! yes. ??? for all zevach-offering ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? holy offerings ??? and redeemed they are obligated ??? between before ??? between after ??? the shearing ??? of them he does not ??? ??? between before ??? between after ??? Watch out for leading vav And we do not make substitute offerings? and before ??? We apply the laws of misappropriation to them and after ??? We do not apply the laws of misappropriation to them ??? weekday ??? for all zevach-offering ??? "The general principle of the thing is that Behold! there are. ??? for all their words yes. to you at them." except the commandments ??? only. but: Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? ??? or ??? transgresses ??? and after from here nolad ??? and redeemed are exempt from ??? and from ??? between before ??? between after ??? the shearing ??? of them ??? ??? or whether before ??? between after ??? doing substitute offerings? before ??? We apply the laws of misappropriation to them and after ??? We do not apply the laws of misappropriation to them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? for all zevach-offering ??? "The general principle of the thing is that Behold! there are. ??? for all their words And there is no meaning to the word to you of them except permission food only. "The general principle of the thing is that that at the beginning of the teaching to include ??? outside this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper "The general principle of the thing is that ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.