It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

to include ??? Mar said: yes. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? for all zevach-offering ??? he that is not ??? this one ??? for all ??? he ??? this one to that very zevach-offering ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? to that very zevach-offering ??? Let him say ??? For Rav Huna Rav would say to you ??? that even ??? yes. ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, yes. ??? But the beginning of the teaching, for all zevach-offering ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, for all zevach-offering ??? outside ??? Rav Huna he would say over he is liable ??? to it ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? for he said: if if they put it up on the altar No. ??? between before ??? between after ??? makes ??? he said ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? after ??? What is the reason? in what way does ??? "Kedushah" ??? No. ??? Therefore, ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? And so Just as between -- this refers to ??? first-born ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? first-born ??? there are. ??? until the end of the whole world Behold! there are. ??? Abaye said to him: this in that place of its mother upon it and this in that place of its mother upon it this all of it ??? first-born ??? Just as first-born ??? Even ??? and this in that place of its mother upon it ??? holy offerings ??? Just as holy offerings No. ??? except ??? Even ??? also No. ??? except ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? from where do we learn ??? invalid as regarding ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 11) ??? tamei This should bring himself ??? sin-offerings die This certain individual (Lev. 11) ??? tamei ??? Another teaching is like this: from where do we learn ??? sin-offerings die Therefore, scripture states: ??? tamei ??? sin-offerings die ??? We have a tradition that to it except For he came he read ??? a guilt-offering ??? a guilt-offering also ??? She all ??? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? sin-offerings die and It was necessary to provide both opinions he read and It was necessary to provide both opinions ??? For if it was the written Torah then I might incorrectly say: ??? Come and learn from this. ??? and if ??? then I might incorrectly say: in a case ??? he ate from those ??? sin-offerings ??? that it is possible Is this not there is not in this case. Come and hear from this. That there are Is this not And if you wish, I would say ??? a thing that comes ??? for a matter of that comes ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ???

דף טז,א משנה

??? from ???

דף טז,ב משנה

??? are exempt ??? they are obligated He placed ??? under ??? are exempt ??? are obligated Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says even until ten are exempt ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? Rachel ??? Rachel ??? from ??? and if there are in it a small portion of signs he is liable

דף טז,ב גמרא

This comes to imply ??? that is not ??? They challenged this from a baraita: yes. ??? from Israel because it was usurious interest Perhaps, ??? Abayye said: There is no difficulty. this one ??? upon it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that that is not he has accepted upon himself ??? He said to him: Raba ??? upon it ??? for him And furthermore, What then does it mean when it says ??? And furthermore, ??? at the end of the teaching, but: ??? from ??? ??? ??? In what matters are we saying this? that is not he has accepted upon himself ??? but: he has accepted upon himself ??? it is of acceptable worth. except Rabba said: This and this that is not he has accepted upon himself ??? and here in this other case, regarding ??? we were The reason is For this will come some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile he is required ??? and not he will give for him ??? to it to a domesticated animal and if No. ??? to it to a domesticated animal ??? Consider this case: a hand some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile in the midst of and all a hand some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile in the midst of ??? from ??? He placed ??? under ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? are exempt ??? they are obligated and Rav Yehudah he said ??? also are exempt ??? they are obligated We have learnt in a Mishna: He placed ??? under ??? are exempt The reason is ??? this one No. He placed No. ??? of Rav Yehudah Rav would say to you Yehudah it is the law even though that is not He placed But hey, come and learn from this. even He placed also ??? he built you shall ??? that is not He placed ??? are exempt ??? they are obligated We have learnt in a Mishna: Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says Even if until ten ??? are exempt ??? some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? This is satisfactory of Rav Yehudah for he said: Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down a Tanna taught: that came first ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.